Scientometrics最新文献_第2页

Prevalence and characteristics of graphical abstracts in a specialist pharmacology journal 专业药理学期刊中图表式摘要的普遍性和特点

IF 3.9 3区管理学

Scientometrics Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05146-5

Russyl Gilling, Marissa Scandlyn, Blair Hesp

{"title":"Prevalence and characteristics of graphical abstracts in a specialist pharmacology journal","authors":"Russyl Gilling, Marissa Scandlyn, Blair Hesp","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05146-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05146-5","url":null,"abstract":"Graphical abstracts (GAs) are publication extenders used to visually communicate scientific concepts and data alongside their parent manuscript. This study investigated the prevalence and characteristics of GAs published in a clinical pharmacology journal that facilitates GA use through free publication and providing templates to authors. The characteristics of clinical publications in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology in issues dated 2021–2023 were collated and accompanying GAs reviewed and compared with the associated written abstracts. In total, 64/1019 (6.3%) publications were accompanied by a GA. There was no association between the presence of a GA and the geographical location of the principal investigator, year of publication or open access status. Industry-funded studies were significantly more likely to include a GA compared with non-industry funded studies (19/179 [10.6%] vs. 25/458 [5.5%]; Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.0246). Professional medical writing support was also associated with a numerically higher prevalence of GAs (16.7% [11/66] vs. 7.6% [7/92] with no medical writing support; Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.1257). While GAs generally included study results (94%), only approximately half presented methodology (58%) and conclusions (50%). Few GAs (27%) included the title of the publication. In conclusion, uptake of GAs by authors was low. Industry and professional medical writing support was associated with increased GA uptake, but the prevalence remained below 20%. GAs are also heterogenous in nature, often inconsistent with the written abstract and are generally unable to stand alone.","PeriodicalId":21755,"journal":{"name":"Scientometrics","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142176274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Measuring hotness transfer of individual papers based on citation relationship 基于引用关系衡量单篇论文的热度转移

IF 3.9 3区管理学

Scientometrics Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05140-x

Jianlin Zhou, Jinshan Wu

{"title":"Measuring hotness transfer of individual papers based on citation relationship","authors":"Jianlin Zhou, Jinshan Wu","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05140-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05140-x","url":null,"abstract":"It is a common phenomenon for scientists to follow hot topics in research and this phenomenon can generally be quantified by measuring the preference attachment of new papers. A similar phenomenon also exists when a paper chooses its references. However, the abovementioned method does not apply to measure the preference for hot papers. To solve this problem, in this paper, we propose to convert measuring a paper’s preference for hot papers into calculating the hotness obtained from a paper’s references. We propose a PageRank-like algorithm that considers the hotness propagation based on citation relationships between papers to measure the hotness transfer of individual papers. We apply this method to the American Physical Society journals and explore the hotness transfer performance of individual papers in physics. It is found that highly innovative papers, such as Nobel Prize-winning papers in physics, have a weaker hotness transfer degree than papers with the same number of citations. We explore the factors associated with the performance of hotness transfer indicators. We find that the larger the size or citation counts of the field are, the stronger the hotness transfer degree of the field is likely to be. The team size and the number of references can also affect the hotness transfer degree of individual papers. Finally, we find that the hotness transfer scores of papers show an increasing trend over time. Relevant empirical discoveries may be valuable for evaluating paper impact.","PeriodicalId":21755,"journal":{"name":"Scientometrics","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142176273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

An integrated indicator for evaluating scientific papers: considering academic impact and novelty 评估科技论文的综合指标：考虑学术影响力和新颖性

IF 3.9 3区管理学

Scientometrics Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05150-9

Zhaoping Yan, Kaiyu Fan

引用次数: 0

Measurement of disruptive innovation and its validity based on improved disruption index 基于改进的破坏性指数的破坏性创新衡量及其有效性

IF 3.9 3区管理学

Scientometrics Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05134-9

Ziyan Zhang, Junyan Zhang, Pushi Wang

{"title":"Measurement of disruptive innovation and its validity based on improved disruption index","authors":"Ziyan Zhang, Junyan Zhang, Pushi Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05134-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05134-9","url":null,"abstract":"Measuring disruptive innovation is a critical and still-developing topic. Although the disruption (D) Index has been widely utilized, it ignores the structural differences between i- and j-type nodes and suffers from inconsistencies, biases related to reference lists, and little comparability across different clusters. To address these possible biases, we propose the improved disruptive Index (ID Index), using a dataset of 114,202 patents from Chinese listed firms to test its validity. The results show that the ID Index (i) provides a more precise measurement of disruptiveness, resolves inconsistencies, reduces biases related to reference lists, and enhances comparability across clusters; (ii) demonstrates better convergent validity, correlating more closely with expert evaluations and more effectively identifying determinants such as knowledge search, recombination, and coordination; (iii) shows better validity in predicting stock market reactions, renewal durations, firms’ short- and long-term performance. Finally, we separate the ID index to independently measure the extent of disrupting and consolidating existing knowledge, and the convergent and predictive validity are demonstrated.","PeriodicalId":21755,"journal":{"name":"Scientometrics","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142176275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Do research universities specialize in disciplines where they hold a competitive advantage? 研究型大学是否专注于其拥有竞争优势的学科？

IF 3.9 3区管理学

Scientometrics Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05136-7

Giovanni Abramo, Francesca Apponi, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo

引用次数: 0

Opium in science and society: numbers and other quantifications 科学和社会中的鸦片：数字和其他量化方式

IF 3.9 3区管理学

Scientometrics Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05104-1

Lutz Bornmann, Julian N. Marewski

{"title":"Opium in science and society: numbers and other quantifications","authors":"Lutz Bornmann, Julian N. Marewski","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05104-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05104-1","url":null,"abstract":"In science and beyond, quantifications are omnipresent when it comes to justifying judgments. Which scientific author, hiring committee-member, or advisory board panelist has not been confronted with page-long publication manuals, assessment reports, evaluation guidelines, calling for p-values, citation rates, h-indices, or other numbers to judge about the ‘quality’ of findings, applicants, or institutions? Yet, many of those of us relying on and calling for quantifications may not understand what information numbers can convey, and what not. Focusing on the uninformed usage of bibliometrics as worrisome outgrowth of the increasing quantification of science, in this opinion essay we place the abuse of quantifications into historical contexts and trends. These are characterized by mistrust in human intuitive judgment, obsessions with control and accountability, and a bureaucratization of science. We call for bringing common sense back into scientific (bibliometric-based) judgment exercises. Despite all number crunching, many judgments—be it about empirical findings or research institutions—will neither be straightforward, clear, and unequivocal, nor can they be ‘validated’ and be ‘objectified’ by external standards. We conclude that assessments in science ought to be understood as and be made as judgments under uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":21755,"journal":{"name":"Scientometrics","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142176377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Independent Russian medical science: is there any? 独立的俄罗斯医学：有吗？

IF 3.9 3区管理学

Scientometrics Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05135-8

Ekaterina Dyachenko, Iurii Agafonov, Katerina Guba, Alexander Gelvikh

{"title":"Independent Russian medical science: is there any?","authors":"Ekaterina Dyachenko, Iurii Agafonov, Katerina Guba, Alexander Gelvikh","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05135-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05135-8","url":null,"abstract":"Decades after the fall of the Iron Curtain, medical research in Russia remains poorly integrated into global science. In this study, we analyze the evolution of Russian medical research presence in international journals in recent years and examine the role of international collaboration in driving this change. We collected data from various sources, including Web of Science, Scopus, and Medline. While articles in international journals still constitute a smaller proportion of all Russian medical publications, their representation has significantly increased in recent years. Articles in high-impact journals now comprise approximately one-third of the total output. International cooperation emerges as a key factor behind top-level Russian medical publications, with international coauthorship playing a particularly significant role in high-impact journals, where 70% of Russian-authored publications include foreign co-authors. It is noteworthy that Russian authors are rarely designated as corresponding authors, suggesting a limited leadership role in project teams, especially, regarding research published in the most prestigious publications. Additionally, Russian scientists produce a notably low number of non-collaborative papers that later achieve high citation rates. Given that 81% of the most productive authors participate in international projects and the recent suspension of many ties and collaborations with foreign scientists, we expect a significant decline in Russia’s presence in core medical journals in the near future.","PeriodicalId":21755,"journal":{"name":"Scientometrics","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142176448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The multifaceted factors affecting the publication times of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus articles: what has changed in two decades 影响小儿眼科和斜视文章发表时间的多方面因素：二十年来的变化

IF 3.9 3区管理学

Scientometrics Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05122-z

Einav Baharav Shlezinger, Rasha Mosleh, Gil Ben-David, Eedy Mezer, Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe

{"title":"The multifaceted factors affecting the publication times of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus articles: what has changed in two decades","authors":"Einav Baharav Shlezinger, Rasha Mosleh, Gil Ben-David, Eedy Mezer, Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05122-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05122-z","url":null,"abstract":"Expeditious publication is an important factor when considering publishing ophthalmic research. We investigated the factors associated with shorter publication times in pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus (POS). We analyzed 2487 POS articles from 8 ophthalmology journals publishing POS articles. Time from submission to acceptance, from acceptance to publication, and from submission to publication were calculated for each article. We compared trends over time of factors affecting the publication times from 2002 to 2007 and those from 2014 to 2018. Median peer review durations were 156 days from submission to acceptance; 79 days from acceptance to publication, and 244 days from submission to publication. The American Journal of Ophthalmology, JAMA Ophthalmology, and Strabismus had the shortest submission to publication time. Authors from Africa, East Europe, Central and South America received the fastest processing time in all time categories, although most authors were based in North America and UK. All-time intervals decreased annually, significantly more during the first decade. In the study's second period, more co-authors and affiliated departments correlated with shorter review times. Manuscripts in higher Impact Factor (IF) journals had faster publication times in the first decade. Female senior authors faced longer submission-to-acceptance times in the first decade. This gender gap disappeared in the second period. A general improvement occurred with most journals, specifically those journals with a higher number of co-authors and affiliated departments, indicating an efficient collaborative authorship. Low-income regions benefited from comparatively shorter time intervals. The gender gap in senior authorship diminished over time.","PeriodicalId":21755,"journal":{"name":"Scientometrics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142176278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Time-tracking substances: harnessing the power of article counts over time with SciFindern 时间追踪物质：利用 SciFindern 随时间变化的文章计数功能

IF 3.9 3区管理学

Scientometrics Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05098-w

Robert Tomaszewski

引用次数: 0

Something old, new, and borrowed. Rise of the systematic reviews 新、旧、借的东西。系统综述的兴起

IF 3.9 3区管理学

Scientometrics Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05133-w

Gheorghe-Gavrilă Hognogi, Ana-Maria Pop

引用次数: 0