Ekaterina Dyachenko, Iurii Agafonov, Katerina Guba, Alexander Gelvikh
{"title":"独立的俄罗斯医学:有吗?","authors":"Ekaterina Dyachenko, Iurii Agafonov, Katerina Guba, Alexander Gelvikh","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05135-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Decades after the fall of the Iron Curtain, medical research in Russia remains poorly integrated into global science. In this study, we analyze the evolution of Russian medical research presence in international journals in recent years and examine the role of international collaboration in driving this change. We collected data from various sources, including Web of Science, Scopus, and Medline. While articles in international journals still constitute a smaller proportion of all Russian medical publications, their representation has significantly increased in recent years. Articles in high-impact journals now comprise approximately one-third of the total output. International cooperation emerges as a key factor behind top-level Russian medical publications, with international coauthorship playing a particularly significant role in high-impact journals, where 70% of Russian-authored publications include foreign co-authors. It is noteworthy that Russian authors are rarely designated as corresponding authors, suggesting a limited leadership role in project teams, especially, regarding research published in the most prestigious publications. Additionally, Russian scientists produce a notably low number of non-collaborative papers that later achieve high citation rates. Given that 81% of the most productive authors participate in international projects and the recent suspension of many ties and collaborations with foreign scientists, we expect a significant decline in Russia’s presence in core medical journals in the near future.</p>","PeriodicalId":21755,"journal":{"name":"Scientometrics","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independent Russian medical science: is there any?\",\"authors\":\"Ekaterina Dyachenko, Iurii Agafonov, Katerina Guba, Alexander Gelvikh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11192-024-05135-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Decades after the fall of the Iron Curtain, medical research in Russia remains poorly integrated into global science. In this study, we analyze the evolution of Russian medical research presence in international journals in recent years and examine the role of international collaboration in driving this change. We collected data from various sources, including Web of Science, Scopus, and Medline. While articles in international journals still constitute a smaller proportion of all Russian medical publications, their representation has significantly increased in recent years. Articles in high-impact journals now comprise approximately one-third of the total output. International cooperation emerges as a key factor behind top-level Russian medical publications, with international coauthorship playing a particularly significant role in high-impact journals, where 70% of Russian-authored publications include foreign co-authors. It is noteworthy that Russian authors are rarely designated as corresponding authors, suggesting a limited leadership role in project teams, especially, regarding research published in the most prestigious publications. Additionally, Russian scientists produce a notably low number of non-collaborative papers that later achieve high citation rates. Given that 81% of the most productive authors participate in international projects and the recent suspension of many ties and collaborations with foreign scientists, we expect a significant decline in Russia’s presence in core medical journals in the near future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientometrics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05135-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientometrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05135-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
铁幕倒塌数十年后,俄罗斯的医学研究仍未能很好地融入全球科学。在本研究中,我们分析了近年来俄罗斯医学研究在国际期刊中的发展变化,并探讨了国际合作在推动这一变化中的作用。我们从各种来源收集数据,包括 Web of Science、Scopus 和 Medline。虽然国际期刊上的文章在俄罗斯所有医学出版物中所占比例仍然较小,但近年来其代表性已显著提高。高影响力期刊上的文章目前约占总产出的三分之一。国际合作是俄罗斯顶级医学出版物背后的一个关键因素,国际合著者在高影响力期刊中发挥着特别重要的作用,其中 70% 的俄罗斯人撰写的出版物包括外国合著者。值得注意的是,俄罗斯作者很少被指定为通讯作者,这表明他们在项目团队中的领导作用有限,尤其是在最负盛名的刊物上发表的研究成果。此外,俄罗斯科学家撰写的非合作论文后来获得了很高的引用率,但数量明显偏低。鉴于81%的高产论文作者参与了国际项目,以及最近与外国科学家的许多联系与合作的中止,我们预计在不久的将来,俄罗斯在核心医学期刊上的影响力将显著下降。
Independent Russian medical science: is there any?
Decades after the fall of the Iron Curtain, medical research in Russia remains poorly integrated into global science. In this study, we analyze the evolution of Russian medical research presence in international journals in recent years and examine the role of international collaboration in driving this change. We collected data from various sources, including Web of Science, Scopus, and Medline. While articles in international journals still constitute a smaller proportion of all Russian medical publications, their representation has significantly increased in recent years. Articles in high-impact journals now comprise approximately one-third of the total output. International cooperation emerges as a key factor behind top-level Russian medical publications, with international coauthorship playing a particularly significant role in high-impact journals, where 70% of Russian-authored publications include foreign co-authors. It is noteworthy that Russian authors are rarely designated as corresponding authors, suggesting a limited leadership role in project teams, especially, regarding research published in the most prestigious publications. Additionally, Russian scientists produce a notably low number of non-collaborative papers that later achieve high citation rates. Given that 81% of the most productive authors participate in international projects and the recent suspension of many ties and collaborations with foreign scientists, we expect a significant decline in Russia’s presence in core medical journals in the near future.
期刊介绍:
Scientometrics aims at publishing original studies, short communications, preliminary reports, review papers, letters to the editor and book reviews on scientometrics. The topics covered are results of research concerned with the quantitative features and characteristics of science. Emphasis is placed on investigations in which the development and mechanism of science are studied by means of (statistical) mathematical methods.
The Journal also provides the reader with important up-to-date information about international meetings and events in scientometrics and related fields. Appropriate bibliographic compilations are published as a separate section. Due to its fully interdisciplinary character, Scientometrics is indispensable to research workers and research administrators throughout the world. It provides valuable assistance to librarians and documentalists in central scientific agencies, ministries, research institutes and laboratories.
Scientometrics includes the Journal of Research Communication Studies. Consequently its aims and scope cover that of the latter, namely, to bring the results of research investigations together in one place, in such a form that they will be of use not only to the investigators themselves but also to the entrepreneurs and research workers who form the object of these studies.