NotaryPub Date : 2023-05-04DOI: 10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-20-22
N.Yu. Chelysheva
{"title":"A Non-Financial Legal Aspect of Losses Caused as a Result of Forced Termination of the Ownership Right","authors":"N.Yu. Chelysheva","doi":"10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-20-22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-20-22","url":null,"abstract":"The latest views of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on judicial practice on compensation for moral damage reveal not only new grounds for paying compensation for physical and moral suffering to victims, but also lead to a rethinking of the content of other legal institutions, such as property, civil liability, losses, etc. From the decisions of the highest judicial bodies considered in the article, it follows that the right to compensation for moral damage arises from the victim and as a result of violation of his property rights, if such a violation caused the victim physical and moral suffering. The detailed analysis of the philosophical understanding of the categories of “property” and “alienation” given in the article suggests that in the future moral damage can be compensated by virtue of the fact of its infliction, regardless of the legality of the causal actions. The main content of the text is an analysis of the positions of the Constitutional Court of Russia and other judicial bodies in terms of the ratio of norms on the inadmissibility of forced termination of property rights and norms on the specifics of compensation for harm caused by legitimate actions.","PeriodicalId":214894,"journal":{"name":"Notary","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127978724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NotaryPub Date : 2023-05-04DOI: 10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-53-56
E. Agibalova, A. A. Ryzhova
{"title":"Features of Digitalization of Notarial Activities in Russia and the USA: The Comparative Aspect","authors":"E. Agibalova, A. A. Ryzhova","doi":"10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-53-56","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-53-56","url":null,"abstract":"The article presents a comparative study of the features of digitalization of notarial activity in Russia and the USA. Reference to successful practices of digitalization of notaries abroad on the example of the USA allowed the authors to identify significant differences in the results of digitalization of notarial activity in Russia and the USA and to conceptualize these differences. Comparative aspects were the peculiarities of the forms of digital notarial activity in both states, including the terms denoting them, as well as the differences between the digital resources used by notaries in Russia and the USA. Two fundamental differences between American and Russian practices were conceptually singled out, indicating a certain decentralization of notarial activities and the notarial community: 1) notaries in the US are empowered to provide remote notarial services only after receiving a special permit issued by a state authority; 2) US notaries use numerous digital resources unlike the Russian Unified Notarial Information System (UIS), which is the only centralized system for notarial services. The authors conclude that despite the general decentralization effect of the U.S. notarial activity there is still great dynamism of service provision, actualization of the notary public principle and integration of notarial subjects in the new digital space. According to the authors, the revealed differences of digital adaptation of notarial activity in Russia and the U.S. are due to objective political and economic reasons; however, in both jurisdictions digitalization promotes unification of notarial practices.","PeriodicalId":214894,"journal":{"name":"Notary","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132250061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NotaryPub Date : 2023-05-04DOI: 10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-6-8
Olga N. Zakharova, Tatyana Yu. Epifantseva
{"title":"Compensation of Damage Caused by the Use of Artificial Intelligence","authors":"Olga N. Zakharova, Tatyana Yu. Epifantseva","doi":"10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-6-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-6-8","url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to the issues of compensation for damage caused by the use of artificial intelligence. The article touches upon the problem of defining the concept of artificial intelligence, as well as determining the subject of responsibility in case of harm caused by artificial intelligence. The authors consider the possibility of attributing the use of artificial intelligence to activities that create increased danger, and in this regard, bringing its owner to responsibility under article 1079 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authors do not support the point of view according to which responsibility is assigned to a person who profits from the use of artificial intelligence. Attention is drawn to the issues of liability under article 1095 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, according to which the seller or manufacturer (developer) of artificial intelligence can be held liable for damage caused by product defects. In the interests of the consumer, as a weaker party, the authors propose to establish norms with the possibility of bringing both the owner and the manufacturer of artificial intelligence to joint responsibility.","PeriodicalId":214894,"journal":{"name":"Notary","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114651736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NotaryPub Date : 2021-03-18DOI: 10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-6-9
G. V. Sintsov, Aleksey A. Prokhorov
{"title":"ON OPPORTUNITIES FOR BROADENING OF NOTARIES’ POWERS IN TERMS OF ORGANIZATION OF VIDEO CONFERENCING WITH COMMERCIAL AND GENERAL JURISDICTION COURTS","authors":"G. V. Sintsov, Aleksey A. Prokhorov","doi":"10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-6-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-6-9","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the author considers the possibility of expanding the powers of notaries in terms of granting them the right to assist the courts in organizing court sessions through videoconferencing systems. The author concludes that the legal basis for this has actually been created, and such a consolidation of additional rights of notaries will significantly simplify the procedure for the remote participation of individuals in the consideration of the case. The granting of this right to notaries is especially relevant in the light of the development of the coronavirus pandemic COVID-19, which imposes serious restrictions on the possibility of direct, full-time participation of persons in court hearings.","PeriodicalId":214894,"journal":{"name":"Notary","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134499732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NotaryPub Date : 2021-03-18DOI: 10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-10-13
T. V. Yaroshenko
{"title":"EXERCISING OF JUDICIAL CONTROL OVER NOTARIAL ACTIVITIES: SOME CHALLENGING ISSUES","authors":"T. V. Yaroshenko","doi":"10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-10-13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-10-13","url":null,"abstract":"The article reveals the procedure for exercising judicial control over notarial activities, analyzes the main types of control, identifies some problematic issues of proposals for improving legislation.","PeriodicalId":214894,"journal":{"name":"Notary","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133643933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NotaryPub Date : 2021-03-18DOI: 10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-24-28
A. V. Fioshin
{"title":"ON CHILD’S RIGHTS BEFORE AND AFTER BIRTH","authors":"A. V. Fioshin","doi":"10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-24-28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-24-28","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the issues of the unborn child’s rights and the abuse of the rights of children born. Examples of various legal orders protecting the life of a child before birth are given. The issue of the need to protect unborn children in the national doctrine is analyzed. The author’s definition of abuse of law in family legal relations is proposed. The abuse of the right by the child is characterized.","PeriodicalId":214894,"journal":{"name":"Notary","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126281593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NotaryPub Date : 2021-03-18DOI: 10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-3-5
A. M. Konovalov
{"title":"NOTARIAL WRIT OF EXECUTION AS A RIGHT ABUSE INSTRUMENT","authors":"A. M. Konovalov","doi":"10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-3-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-3-5","url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses some of the features of performing such a notarial act as making an Executive inscription by a notary. In this article, by comparing with the institution of order production, the author draws attention to a number of problems that exist in the institution of a notary’s executive inscription, which make it possible to turn this notarial action from a method of protecting violated rights into an instrument of abuse by claimants, and also suggests ways to solve them.","PeriodicalId":214894,"journal":{"name":"Notary","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116906494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NotaryPub Date : 2021-03-18DOI: 10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-42-45
S. G. Dolgov
{"title":"THE NOTARIAL SYSTEM TODAY, DIGITAL OR ELECTRONIC?","authors":"S. G. Dolgov","doi":"10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-42-45","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-42-45","url":null,"abstract":"Through the text of this article the analysis of the current legislation for the use of the concepts “electronic document”, “electronic image of a document”, “digital document” is carried out, the points of view of scientists who have analyzed the indicated concepts are given, the requirements for the registration of electronic documents are studied, it is concluded that the legislation more often such concepts as “electronic document”, “electronic document image” are used; in the scientific and legal literature, they adhere to the point of view about electronic notaries, and not about digital.","PeriodicalId":214894,"journal":{"name":"Notary","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131570206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NotaryPub Date : 2021-03-18DOI: 10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-33-36
Larisa E. Chitaeva
{"title":"ACTUAL ACCEPTANCE OF INHERITANCE AS ONE OF ACCEPTANCE MEANS","authors":"Larisa E. Chitaeva","doi":"10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-33-36","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-33-36","url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses topical issues related to the actions of the heirs that arise in the process of their actual acceptance of inheritance, its registration, analyzes the actions that indicate its fulfillment, expression of will. The legal analysis of the actual acceptance of the inheritance as one of the ways of its acceptance is carried out. The difference between the actual acceptance of the inheritance and the restoration of the missed term for the acceptance of the inheritance is considered.","PeriodicalId":214894,"journal":{"name":"Notary","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130842099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NotaryPub Date : 2021-03-18DOI: 10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-46-48
Zhanna B. Ivanova
{"title":"FROM THE MERCHANT’S WORD OF HONOR TO THE NOTARIAL PROTECTION IN ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITIES","authors":"Zhanna B. Ivanova","doi":"10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-46-48","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-46-48","url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the historical development of binding agreements in business activities from honest merchant’s word to notarial protection. At the present stage, according to the author, it is necessary to rethink the interpretation of the honest merchant word as a national phenomenon in business.","PeriodicalId":214894,"journal":{"name":"Notary","volume":"343 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130885803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}