A Non-Financial Legal Aspect of Losses Caused as a Result of Forced Termination of the Ownership Right

N.Yu. Chelysheva
{"title":"A Non-Financial Legal Aspect of Losses Caused as a Result of Forced Termination of the Ownership Right","authors":"N.Yu. Chelysheva","doi":"10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-20-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The latest views of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on judicial practice on compensation for moral damage reveal not only new grounds for paying compensation for physical and moral suffering to victims, but also lead to a rethinking of the content of other legal institutions, such as property, civil liability, losses, etc. From the decisions of the highest judicial bodies considered in the article, it follows that the right to compensation for moral damage arises from the victim and as a result of violation of his property rights, if such a violation caused the victim physical and moral suffering. The detailed analysis of the philosophical understanding of the categories of “property” and “alienation” given in the article suggests that in the future moral damage can be compensated by virtue of the fact of its infliction, regardless of the legality of the causal actions. The main content of the text is an analysis of the positions of the Constitutional Court of Russia and other judicial bodies in terms of the ratio of norms on the inadmissibility of forced termination of property rights and norms on the specifics of compensation for harm caused by legitimate actions.","PeriodicalId":214894,"journal":{"name":"Notary","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Notary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-20-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The latest views of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on judicial practice on compensation for moral damage reveal not only new grounds for paying compensation for physical and moral suffering to victims, but also lead to a rethinking of the content of other legal institutions, such as property, civil liability, losses, etc. From the decisions of the highest judicial bodies considered in the article, it follows that the right to compensation for moral damage arises from the victim and as a result of violation of his property rights, if such a violation caused the victim physical and moral suffering. The detailed analysis of the philosophical understanding of the categories of “property” and “alienation” given in the article suggests that in the future moral damage can be compensated by virtue of the fact of its infliction, regardless of the legality of the causal actions. The main content of the text is an analysis of the positions of the Constitutional Court of Russia and other judicial bodies in terms of the ratio of norms on the inadmissibility of forced termination of property rights and norms on the specifics of compensation for harm caused by legitimate actions.
所有权强制解除所造成损失的非财务法律层面
俄罗斯联邦宪法法院和俄罗斯联邦最高法院关于精神损害赔偿司法实践的最新意见不仅揭示了对受害者的身体和精神痛苦进行赔偿的新理由,而且还导致对其他法律制度的内容的重新思考,如财产、民事责任、损失等。根据该条所审议的最高司法机关的决定,可以得出结论,精神损害赔偿的权利是由受害者产生的,并且是由于侵犯了他的财产权,如果这种侵犯使受害者遭受了身体和精神上的痛苦。本文对“财产”和“异化”范畴的哲学理解进行了详细分析,表明在未来,无论因果行为是否合法,道德损害都可以凭借其造成的事实而得到补偿。本文的主要内容是分析俄罗斯宪法法院和其他司法机构在关于强制终止财产权不可接受的规范和关于合法行为造成损害的赔偿细节的规范的比例方面的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信