Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy最新文献_第5页

A disaster by any other name?: COVID-19 and support for an All-Hazards approach. 任何其他名称的灾难？COVID-19 和对全灾方法的支持。

IF 1.9

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-07 DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12213

Samantha Penta, James Kendra, Valerie Marlowe, Kimberly Gill

引用次数: 0

Wildfire governance in a changing world: Insights for policy learning and policy transfer 变化世界中的野火治理:政策学习和政策转移的见解

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12235

W. Nikolakis, E. Roberts

引用次数: 14

Trust in experts, not trust in national leadership, leads to greater uptake of recommended actions during the COVID-19 pandemic. 在 COVID-19 大流行期间，对专家的信任，而不是对国家领导的信任，会使建议的行动得到更多采纳。

IF 1.9

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-27 DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12219

Sangeeta C Ahluwalia, Maria O Edelen, Nabeel Qureshi, Jason M Etchegaray

{"title":"Trust in experts, not trust in national leadership, leads to greater uptake of recommended actions during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Sangeeta C Ahluwalia, Maria O Edelen, Nabeel Qureshi, Jason M Etchegaray","doi":"10.1002/rhc3.12219","DOIUrl":"10.1002/rhc3.12219","url":null,"abstract":"Evidence suggests that people vary in their desire to undertake protective actions during a health emergency, and that trust in authorities may influence decision making. We sought to examine how the trust in health experts and trust in White House leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic impacts individuals' decisions to adopt recommended protective actions such as mask-wearing. A mediation analysis was conducted using cross-sectional U.S. survey data collected between March 27 and 30, 2020, to elucidate how individuals' trust in health experts and White House leadership, their perceptions of susceptibility and severity to COVID-19, and perceived benefits of protecting against COVID-19, influenced their uptake of recommended protective actions. Trust in health experts was associated with greater perceived severity of COVID-19 and benefits of taking action, which led to greater uptake of recommended actions. Trust in White House leadership was associated with lower perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 and was not associated with taking recommended actions. Having trust in health experts is a greater predictor of individuals' uptake of protective actions than having trust in White House leadership. Public health messaging should emphasize the severity of COVID-19 and the benefits of protecting oneself while ensuring consistency and transparency to regain trust in health experts.","PeriodicalId":21362,"journal":{"name":"Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy","volume":"12 3","pages":"283-302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8242428/pdf/RHC3-12-283.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39158349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Assessing the effects of calculated inaction on national responses to the COVID-19 crisis. 评估蓄意不作为对国家应对COVID-19危机的影响。

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-09 DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12230

Nikolaos Zahariadis, Stephen Ceccoli, Evangelia Petridou

引用次数: 3

The impact of social distancing on community case count in the United States: Testing the efficacy of protection motivation theory during early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. 美国社会距离对社区病例数的影响：在 COVID-19 大流行初期测试保护动机理论的有效性。

IF 1.9

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-13 DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12232

Minkyu Yeom, Fran Stewart, Alice Stewart

{"title":"The impact of social distancing on community case count in the United States: Testing the efficacy of protection motivation theory during early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Minkyu Yeom, Fran Stewart, Alice Stewart","doi":"10.1002/rhc3.12232","DOIUrl":"10.1002/rhc3.12232","url":null,"abstract":"Centuries of practice and an array of public health literature support social distancing (SD), or self-quarantine, as a valuable nonpharmaceutical intervention. To convince individuals to engage in behaviors that limit infection, public health professionals communicate risk and hazard based on application of protection motivation theory (PMT). The COVID-19 pandemic presents an opportunity to explore the efficacy of PMT in the context of a novel coronavirus with unique public health implications. We test an integrative conceptual model of social distancing compliance in U.S. counties and examine the mediating impact of SD on community spread of infection. We find that PMT does impact individual behavior, observing that the proportion of vulnerable populations affects social distancing compliance. However, actions to protect individual health are made within the context of economic concerns and priorities. While results indicate that PMT influences behavior, the expected relationship between that behavior and spread of disease in the community is not found. We do not repudiate SD or the value of PMT, but we suggest that these results may indicate that communication of risk in the context of COVID-19 may need community, as well as individual, framing.","PeriodicalId":21362,"journal":{"name":"Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy","volume":"12 3","pages":"303-327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661797/pdf/RHC3-12-303.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39588694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Property rights attitudes are a source of public opposition to flood mitigation policies in the United States 在美国，对财产权利的态度是公众反对减轻洪水政策的一个原因

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-08-27 DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12233

Logan Strother, Laura J. Hatcher

引用次数: 3

Do collective bargaining rights save lives? A rare event analysis of firefighter fatalities in the United States 集体谈判权能拯救生命吗?对美国消防员死亡的罕见事件分析

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-06-22 DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12224

Dominic D. Wells

引用次数: 4

Managing National Food Security in the Global North: Is collaborative governance a possible route forward? 管理全球北方的国家粮食安全:协作治理是一条可能的前进道路吗?

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-06-09 DOI: 10.1002/RHC3.12231

O. Larsson, Sarah Sjöqvist

{"title":"Managing National Food Security in the Global North: Is collaborative governance a possible route forward?","authors":"O. Larsson, Sarah Sjöqvist","doi":"10.1002/RHC3.12231","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/RHC3.12231","url":null,"abstract":"Many countries in the “Global North” that have enjoyed relative food security for a number of decades now face challenges that may lead to disturbances in food supplies. Global markets and global flows are not as self-evident as they were a few years ago and new modes of governance for managing national food security during crisis are required. Recent events such as the COVID-19 pandemic have further showed that global production systems and communications are fragile to a range of different disturbances. This article examines the possibility of managing national food security through collaborative arrangements between public authorities and private food companies through a case study of the Swedish approach to food security. The analysis is based on a theoretical framework that highlights the importance of motivation, leadership, shared understanding, and trust as four dimensions that evaluate collaborative governance in precrisis situations. We conclude that although a broader understnding of the importance of food security has emerged, collaborative governance arrangements run the risk of creating only an illusion of readiness, due to unclear mandates and clear leadership not able to advance trust, legal structures, or concrete agreements for ensuring national food security. © 2021 The Authors. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Policy Studies Organization","PeriodicalId":21362,"journal":{"name":"Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/RHC3.12231","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43072839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Issue Information 问题信息

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12196

引用次数: 0

Cascading hazards and hazard mitigation plans: Preventing cascading events in the United States 级联危害和危害缓解计划:在美国防止级联事件

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-05-18 DOI: 10.1002/RHC3.12220

J. Chen, M. Greenberg

引用次数: 2