Quality Management in Health Care最新文献

{"title":"Methods for Human Reliability Analysis in Dentistry.","authors":"Bojan Bijelic, Dragutin Grozdanovic, Miroljub Grozdanovic, Evica Jovanovic","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000462","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000462","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human error (HE) is one of the main causes of accidents in different organizations and industries. Dentistry is a medical branch with a high risk of error since it involves complex manual tasks that must be performed with a high degree of accuracy. To understand the various aspects of HE in dentistry, which is crucial for developing strategies to mitigate its impact on patients' safety, it is necessary to perform a human reliability analysis (HRA). However, there is scarce data on the use of HRA in dentistry. In this paper, we give a brief description of the main phases of HRA with an emphasis on HRA methods that could be used in dentistry. Since HRA methods have been designed for diverse industrial applications, we discuss their possible application in dentistry. Among the discussed methods, the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA) and the Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique were identified as the best candidates for performing HRA in dentistry. This is of great importance since understanding and addressing HEs is crucial for improving patient safety and the overall quality of dental care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessment of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program for Enhancing Clinical Knowledge in Neonatal Care Settings With High Antimicrobial Resistance.","authors":"Faiza Iqbal, N Siva, Leslie Edward S Lewis, Jayashree Purkayastha, Shruthi K Bharadwaj, Baby S Nayak, Padmaja A Shenoy, Deepshri Ranjan, K E Vandana","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000468","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000468","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global problem, which is particularly challenging in developing countries like India. This study attempts to determine the competencies of health care professionals and to update evidence-based policies to address AMR.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey-based educational interventional study was conducted using a validated structured survey and knowledge questionnaire under 3 domains through an antimicrobial stewardship program. Pooled data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 58 participants, 53 (91%) have observed an increasing trend of multidrug-resistant infections over the last 5 years. There is a significant difference between the overall pretest mean scores (8.12 ± 2.10) and posttest mean scores (12.5 ± 1.49) of clinicians' knowledge with a mean difference of 4.38 ± 0.61, 95% CI of 5.003-3.92, t(57) = 16.62, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The antimicrobial stewardship program was effective in improving the competencies of clinical physicians to improve antimicrobial prescribing and reduce AMR. Moreover, improving the knowledge and competencies among health care professionals will minimize neonatal morbidity and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Changes in Clinical Competence of Novice Physical Therapists During Their First Year of Employment: A Single Center Retrospective Observational Study in Japan.","authors":"Ikuo Motoya, Shigeo Tanabe, Soichiro Koyama, Yuichi Hirakawa, Masanobu Iwai, Kazuya Takeda, Yoshikiyo Kanada, Nobutoshi Kawamura, Mami Kawamura, Hiroaki Sakurai","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000459","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000459","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the development of clinical competence of novice physical therapists (PTs) during their first year of employment, following the implementation of an original in-house educational program. The educational program was designed to offer diverse training opportunities at an early stage, during the first year of employment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight novice PTs (21 males and 17 females, mean age 23.4 ± 3.2 years) participated in this study. All participants underwent educational programs and a self-assessment using the Clinical Competence Evaluation Scale in Physical Therapy (CEPT) on the first day of employment (entry-level) and after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of employment. The total score and CEPT component-wise scores-\"knowledge,\" \"clinical reasoning,\" \"skill,\" \"communication,\" \"attitude,\" \"self-education,\" and \"self-management\"-at the 4 assessment points (1, 3, 6, and 12 months) were compared with values on the first day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total scores at 3, 6, and 12 months of employment were significantly higher than those on the first day of employment (P < .05). Among the total scores on the 7 components, those for \"knowledge,\" \"clinical reasoning,\" \"skill,\" and \"communication\" at 3, 6, and 12 months after employment were also significantly higher than those on the first day of employment (P < .05). The scores for \"attitude\" and \"self-education\" 12 months after employment were significantly higher than those on the first day of employment. However, the \"self-management\" scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after employment did not significantly change compared with those on the first day of employment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The total score was significantly higher after 3 months. The participant's clinical competence may have improved because they participated in an educational program related to \"knowledge,\" \"clinical reasoning,\" \"skills,\" and \"communication\" at an earlier stage in the first year. However, their progress was comparatively slower in other areas, suggesting that the content might not have been sufficient. This study revealed the effectiveness of the educational program on novice PTs' clinical competence at a single institution in Japan. Positive outcomes were obtained for several parameters. Furthermore, the results reveal the need for content modifications within the educational program to improve PTs' performance across all evaluated items.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Specialty-Based Ambulatory Quality Improvement Program: A Specialty-Specific Ambulatory Metric Project.","authors":"Arielle R Nagler, Paul A Testa, Ilseung Cho, Gbenga Ogedegbe, Gary Kalkut, Dana R Gossett","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000481","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000481","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Healthcare is increasingly being delivered in the outpatient setting, but robust quality improvement programs and performance metrics are lacking in ambulatory care, particularly specialty-based ambulatory care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To promote quality improvement in ambulatory care, we developed an infrastructure to create specialty-specific quality measures and dashboards that could be used to display providers' performance across relevant measures to individual providers and institutional leaders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The products of this program include a governance and infrastructure for specialty-specific ambulatory quality metrics as well as two distinct dashboards for data display. One dashboard is provider-facing, displaying provider's performance on specialty-specific measures as compared to institutional standards. The second dashboard is a leadership dashboard that provides overall and provider-level information on performance across measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Specialty-based Ambulatory Quality program reflects a systematic, institutionally-supported quality improvement framework that can be applied across diverse ambulatory specialties. As next steps, we plan to evaluate the program's impact on provider performance across measures and expand this program to other specialties practicing in the outpatient setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Integrating DMAIC Philosophy and Bow-Tie Model for Quantitative Risk Assessment in Health Care.","authors":"Heng Zhao, Yingyan Liu","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000457","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000457","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Medical risks are considered to endanger patients and impact the health care system. Such iatrogenic risks necessitate hospitals taking a more proactive method to quantitatively analyze medical risk, and then to implement more targeted precautions. To address this problem, a novel quantitative risk assessment framework is proposed and further applied in radiotherapy risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A framework combining DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) and bow-tie model is used to assess health care risk. The uncertainty of medical risks is quantified with fuzzy set theory. The impact and the priority of medical risks were classified based on the risk matrix, and then the precautions were implemented to mitigate their impact. A case study of radiation treatment is provided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The probabilities and impacts of risk events for radiation treatment were quantified based on the proposed framework, and risk protection measures were proposed to mitigate the undesired consequence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed framework showing an effective method of quantitative risk assessment of health care. The study also enriches the risk assessment methods in health care by providing a conductive and normalized framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Factors Associated With Acceptance of an Optional Diagnosis.","authors":"Cortney Matthews, David Ring, Teun Teunis, Sina Ramtin","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000476","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000476","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A sensation becomes a symptom (a concern) when a person associates it with potential illness. In the absence of objective evidence of a pathophysiological process that has important health consequences without treatment, assigning a diagnosis to the sensation is optional. This is important because labeling of benign bodily sensations as pathophysiology has potential advantages and disadvantages.</p><p><strong>Question: </strong>We asked what patient and clinician factors are associated with willingness to accept an optional diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a survey administered using Amazon M-Turk, 536 people anonymously completed validated measures for symptoms of anxiety and depression, intolerance of uncertainty, and skepticism regarding the healthcare system. They then viewed fictional personal medical scenarios in which they were asked to imagine they experienced certain symptoms, and were offered an optional diagnosis of a nerve problem, muscle pain syndrome, or fatigue syndrome, and were asked to rate their willingness to accept the diagnosis on an 12-point ordinal scale from 0 indicating \"I do not accept it at all\" to 11 indicating \"I accept it with enthusiasm.\" The language of the scenarios was varied to attempt to reflect critical thinking, denigration of other doctors, an alternative mental health focus, or a hopeful outlook. Multilevel linear regression was used to identify factors associated with likelihood of accepting an optional diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Threshold likelihood of accepting an optional diagnosis greater than 5.5 on a 0 to 11 ordinal scale was independently associated with greater symptoms of anxiety (regression coefficient [RC] = 0.38, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.30-0.47, P < .001), greater skepticism regarding the healthcare system (RC = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.076-0.13, P < .001), and delivery tones characterized by either denigration of other doctors (RC = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.19-0.60, P < .001) or a hopeful outlook (RC = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.26-0.73, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Likelihood of accepting an optional diagnosis may be a sign of relative vulnerability from feelings of distress or distrust of medical evidence. Given this potential vulnerability, clinicians can take care to limit persuasive communication styles that can influence acceptance of optional diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III prognostic.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Letter to the Editor on \"Burnout Among Family Physicians in the United States: A Review of the Literature\".","authors":"Priscila R Armijo, Rachel Esparza, Dana Al-Assi, Narjust Florez, Roberta Gebhard","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000486","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000486","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"COVID-19's Effect on Practice Quality Improvement and Transformation Activities: Practice Survey Results.","authors":"Suzanne Felt-Lisk, Jesse Chandler, Angela Merrill, Shawan Johnson, Damian Everhart, Robert Flemming","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000472","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000472","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The Transforming Clinical Practices Initiative (TCPI) was a 4-year, large-scale, collaborative, peer-based learning initiative for physician practices of all specialties with broad goals to improve the quality of patient care, spend health care dollars more wisely, and assist practices in being ready to succeed under value-based payment (VBP). We investigated whether the COVID-19 pandemic had erased or diminished practice transformation progress made during the TCPI program period, through a follow-up survey of participating practices fielded in October 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In October 2021 to April 2022, we surveyed a probability sample of 2207 primary care and specialty practices that participated in the TCPI, receiving 610 responses. We asked about practice characteristics, financial and ownership stability, clinical performance, and quality improvement efforts, both now and prior to COVID-19. The COVID-19 content was part of a larger survey. Responses were weighted to account for sample selection, unknown eligibility status, and nonresponse. We generated weighted univariate descriptive statistics representative of practices with clinicians enrolled in TCPI. These estimated percentages have a 95% confidence interval of about ±5%. Multivariate analysis of unweighted data examined associations between practice characteristics and other variables of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all but one of 13 practice transformation activities engaged in prior to the COVID-19 public health emergency, a majority of practices (at least 52%) reported that the progress on these activities were either not hurt or were helped by their COVID-19 experience. Compared to January 2020, only about 7% of practices reported that their quality of care or clinical performance was worse due to COVID-19, and 32% reported that their quality of care was better. More rural than urban practices reported that half or more of their transformation activities were hurt by COVID-19 (29% and 14%, respectively). Physician-owned practices were more likely to report quality is better today than prior to COVID-19 relative to practices with other ownership types such as hospitals or health systems (43% vs 24%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most practices have been able to recover from the deep stress of the COVID-19 pandemic and continue their efforts to improve patient care and performance to succeed under VBP. These results suggest a high perceived return on investment in value-readiness support along with emergency financial support in times of crisis, as well as room to continue preparation for any future pandemic and the national movement toward increased VBP, especially in rural settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Differences in Utilization of Preventive Services for Primary Care Clinicians Participating in MIPS and ACOs.","authors":"Mina Shrestha, Hari Sharma, Keith J Mueller","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000483","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000483","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Value-based payment programs link payments to the performance of providers on cost and quality of care to incentivize high-value care. To improve quality and lower costs, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented the Quality Payment Program (QPP) for clinicians in 2017. Under the Medicare QPP, most eligible clinicians participate in one of the payment models: (a) Advanced Alternative Payment Models (A-APMs) through eligible APMs like Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) or (b) the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). ACO and MIPS clinicians participating in QPP differ in quality reporting requirements, and these differences are likely to affect the utilization of different quality measures, including preventive services. This study evaluated the differences in the utilization of preventive services by primary care clinicians participating in MIPS and ACOs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use difference-in-difference regressions to compare preventive services in MIPS versus ACOs. Since preventive services like immunization and certain cancer screening are mandatory reporting measures for ACOs and voluntary measures for MIPS, the treatment group for this study is ACO clinicians and the comparison group is non-ACO MIPS clinicians. We obtained the rates of influenza immunization, pneumonia vaccination, tobacco use cessation intervention, depression screening, colorectal cancer screening, breast cancer screening, and wellness visits per 10 000 Medicare beneficiaries from Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Public Use File (2012-2018).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We had 508 144 total observations (ACO = 25.78% and MIPS = 74.22%) from 72 592 unique primary care clinicians. Compared to MIPS clinicians, ACO clinicians had significantly higher rates of pneumonia vaccination (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.43) but lower rates of colorectal cancer screening (IRR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.96). Similarly, clinicians in ACO shared savings-only models had significantly higher rates of pneumonia vaccination (IRR 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11-1.48), depression screening (IRR 1.72; 95% CI, 1.09-2.71), and wellness visits (IRR 1.27; 95% CI, 1.09-1.47) compared to MIPS clinicians. There were no differences between ACO and MIPS clinicians on the utilization of breast cancer screening procedures and tobacco use cessation interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACO clinicians may have prioritized relatively low-cost services such as pneumonia vaccination, depression screening, and wellness visits to improve their performance under QPP. Policymakers may need to alter incentives in performance-based payment programs to ensure that clinicians are improving all types of quality measures, including cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142584203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Mitigating Medical Adverse Events Following Spinal Surgery: The Effectiveness of a Postoperative Quality Improvement (QI) Care Bundle.","authors":"Eryck Moskven, Michael Craig, Daniel Banaszek, Tom Inglis, Lise Belanger, Eric C Sayre, Tamir Ailon, Raphaële Charest-Morin, Nicolas Dea, Marcel F Dvorak, Charles G Fisher, Brian K Kwon, Scott Paquette, Dean R Chittock, Donald E G Griesdale, John T Street","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000488","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000488","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Spine surgery is associated with a high incidence of postoperative medical adverse events (AEs). Many of these events are considered \"minor\" though their cost and effect on outcome may be underestimated. We sought to examine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a postoperative quality improvement (QI) care bundle in mitigating postoperative medical AEs in adult surgical spine patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected 14-year prospective observational interrupted time series (ITS) with two historical cohorts: 2006 to 2008, pre-implementation of the postoperative QI care bundle; and 2009 to 2019, post-implementation of the postoperative QI care bundle. Adverse Events were identified and graded (Minor I and II) using the previously validated Spine AdVerse Events Severity (SAVES) system. Pearson Correlation tested for changes across patient and surgical variables. Adjusted segmented regression estimated the effect of the postoperative QI care bundle on the annual and absolute incidences of medical AEs between the two periods. A cost model estimated the annual cumulative cost savings through preventing these \"minor\" medical AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 13,493 patients over the study period with a mean of 964 per year (SD ± 73). Mean age, mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and mean spine surgical invasiveness index (SSII) increased from 48.4 to 58.1 years; 1.7 to 2.6; and 15.4 to 20.5, respectively (p < 0.001). Unadjusted analysis confirmed a significant decrease in the annual number of all medical AEs (p < 0.01). When adjusting for age, CCI and SSII, segmented regression demonstrated a significant absolute reduction in the annual incidence of cardiac, pulmonary, nausea and medication-related AEs by 9.58%, 7.82%, 11.25% and 15.01%, respectively (p < 0.01). The postoperative QI care bundle was not associated with reducing the annual incidence of delirium, electrolyte levels or GI AEs. Annual projected cost savings for preventing Grade I and II medical AEs were $1,808,300 CAD and $11,961,500 CAD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative QI care bundles are effective for improving patient care and preventing medical care-related AEs, with significant cost savings. Postoperative QI care bundles should be tailored to the specific vulnerability of the surgical population for experiencing AEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}