Tutorial on Multiple Mediation Analysis Using Causal Networks: Application to Diagnosing COVID-19 From Its Early and Late Symptoms.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Farrokh Alemi, Vasantha Sandhya Venu, Sai Chandra Nikhil Madduru, Kyung Hee Lee
{"title":"Tutorial on Multiple Mediation Analysis Using Causal Networks: Application to Diagnosing COVID-19 From Its Early and Late Symptoms.","authors":"Farrokh Alemi, Vasantha Sandhya Venu, Sai Chandra Nikhil Madduru, Kyung Hee Lee","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>There are two methods of studying multiple mediation: network-based and analysis of coefficients in regression equations.</p><p><p>This tutorial shows how multiple mediation analysis can be conducted through first constructing causal networks; and then evaluating the direct and mediated impact within the network. The proposed method is demonstrated in the context of diagnosing COVID-19 from its symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>822 individuals who had completed a COVID-19 test were recruited through listservs and via employees and patients of Virginia Commonwealth University Health Center. Participants reported their symptoms and which symptom(s) occurred first. A Causal Network model was established through a repeated chain of regressions in four steps: First, we identified the order of occurrence of symptoms. Second, COVID-19 test results were LASSO regressed on symptoms and demographic variables, establishing direct effects. Third, the direct effects were LASSO regressed on prior symptoms and demographic variables, establishing indirect effects. Fourth, the joint distribution of the variables in the network was simulated by evaluating regression equations at factorial combinations of their direct effects. Fifth, the mediated effect was calculated through twin modeling, where the model derived from the real data was compared to the counterfactual model that represented 'what if' there was no mediation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 10-fold cross-validated area under the receiver curve for the network model was 0.82, which is a moderate to high level of accuracy. The network model identified later symptoms (e.g., chills) mediated the effect of earlier symptoms (e.g. fever).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A network-based multiple mediation analysis led to new insights by integrating findings of 19 separate regressions into a single network model. The procedure showed how artificial intelligence can help in triage of COVID-19 patients from their symptoms, before any home or laboratory tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: There are two methods of studying multiple mediation: network-based and analysis of coefficients in regression equations.

This tutorial shows how multiple mediation analysis can be conducted through first constructing causal networks; and then evaluating the direct and mediated impact within the network. The proposed method is demonstrated in the context of diagnosing COVID-19 from its symptoms.

Methods: 822 individuals who had completed a COVID-19 test were recruited through listservs and via employees and patients of Virginia Commonwealth University Health Center. Participants reported their symptoms and which symptom(s) occurred first. A Causal Network model was established through a repeated chain of regressions in four steps: First, we identified the order of occurrence of symptoms. Second, COVID-19 test results were LASSO regressed on symptoms and demographic variables, establishing direct effects. Third, the direct effects were LASSO regressed on prior symptoms and demographic variables, establishing indirect effects. Fourth, the joint distribution of the variables in the network was simulated by evaluating regression equations at factorial combinations of their direct effects. Fifth, the mediated effect was calculated through twin modeling, where the model derived from the real data was compared to the counterfactual model that represented 'what if' there was no mediation.

Results: The 10-fold cross-validated area under the receiver curve for the network model was 0.82, which is a moderate to high level of accuracy. The network model identified later symptoms (e.g., chills) mediated the effect of earlier symptoms (e.g. fever).

Conclusions: A network-based multiple mediation analysis led to new insights by integrating findings of 19 separate regressions into a single network model. The procedure showed how artificial intelligence can help in triage of COVID-19 patients from their symptoms, before any home or laboratory tests.

基于因果网络的多重中介分析教程:在COVID-19早期和晚期症状诊断中的应用
背景与目的:研究多元中介的方法有两种:基于网络的方法和回归方程系数分析方法。本教程展示了如何通过首先构建因果网络来进行多重中介分析;然后评估网络中直接和间接的影响。以COVID-19的症状诊断为例,对该方法进行了验证。方法:通过listservs和弗吉尼亚联邦大学健康中心的员工和患者招募完成COVID-19测试的822人。参与者报告了他们的症状以及最先出现的症状。通过重复的回归链,分四个步骤建立了因果网络模型:首先,我们确定了症状发生的顺序。第二,对COVID-19检测结果进行症状和人口学变量的LASSO回归,建立直接影响。第三,直接效应对既往症状和人口学变量进行LASSO回归,建立间接效应。第四,通过评估其直接影响的因子组合的回归方程来模拟网络中变量的联合分布。第五,通过孪生模型计算中介效应,其中来自真实数据的模型与代表“如果”没有中介的反事实模型进行比较。结果:网络模型的接收者曲线下的10倍交叉验证面积为0.82,准确度为中高水平。网络模型确定了后期症状(如寒战)介导早期症状(如发烧)的影响。结论:基于网络的多重中介分析通过将19个独立回归的结果整合到一个单一的网络模型中,得出了新的见解。该程序显示了人工智能如何在进行任何家庭或实验室测试之前,帮助将COVID-19患者从症状中分类出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality Management in Health Care
Quality Management in Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it: -Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes; -Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes; -Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making; -Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes; -Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信