发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Studia graeco-arabica最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
La concezione plotiniana della parcellizzazione (μερισμός): la nozione di parcellizzazione nella filosofia di Plotino 设计plotiniana分散(μερισμός):Plotino哲学中分散的概念
Studia graeco-arabica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.12871/97888333988151
Leonida Vanni
{"title":"La concezione plotiniana della parcellizzazione (μερισμός): la nozione di parcellizzazione nella filosofia di Plotino","authors":"Leonida Vanni","doi":"10.12871/97888333988151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12871/97888333988151","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":208121,"journal":{"name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134888014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Le manuscrit Ṭabāṭabāʾī 1367 Une nouvelle version des Taʿlīqāt d’Avicenne au De Anima et la découverte de la traduction arabe du De Anima I 1 - II 2 par Isḥāq ibn Ḥunayn ab手稿Ṭabāṭāʾīl - Taʿ1367新版qītāvicenne Anima的和发现的阿拉伯文译文Anima I - 1 - 2二段Isḥāq ibnḤunayn
Studia graeco-arabica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.12871/97888333988157
Jawdath Jabbour
{"title":"Le manuscrit Ṭabāṭabāʾī 1367 Une nouvelle version des Taʿlīqāt d’Avicenne au De Anima et la découverte de la traduction arabe du De Anima I 1 - II 2 par Isḥāq ibn Ḥunayn","authors":"Jawdath Jabbour","doi":"10.12871/97888333988157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12871/97888333988157","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":208121,"journal":{"name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134890107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Unnoticed Fragment of the Ps.-Theology of Aristotle in a Manuscript of Averroes’ Talḫīṣ al-Manṭiq Preserved in Iran 伊朗保存的阿威罗伊Talḫīṣ al-Manṭiq手稿中未被注意到的亚里士多德神学片段
Studia graeco-arabica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.12871/978883339881512
Banafsheh Eftekhari, Teymour Morel
{"title":"An Unnoticed Fragment of the Ps.-Theology of Aristotle in a Manuscript of Averroes’ Talḫīṣ al-Manṭiq Preserved in Iran","authors":"Banafsheh Eftekhari, Teymour Morel","doi":"10.12871/978883339881512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12871/978883339881512","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":208121,"journal":{"name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"161 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134890589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Porphyry’s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition 斑菲利对希伯来逻辑传统中差异的第一个定义
Studia graeco-arabica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.12871/978883339614917
C. Manekin
{"title":"Porphyry’s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition","authors":"C. Manekin","doi":"10.12871/978883339614917","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12871/978883339614917","url":null,"abstract":"Although most students during the Middle Ages began their study of the Organon with Porphyry’s summary of the predicables in the Isagoge , Jewish students in Christian lands studied it mostly via Averroes’ paraphrase or “middle commentary”, since Porphyry’s text was not translated into Hebrew. The popularity of Averroes’ paraphrase was impressive; it is extant in over 80 Hebrew manuscripts, upon which there are thirteen extant Hebrew commentaries. This article introduces and illustrates those commentaries by taking one short passage from Averroes and seeing how it was subsequently interpreted. It argues that there was a Hebrew commentarial tradition in which later commentaries built upon earlier ones, which migrated with itinerant scholars. It also shows the influence of the Latin translation of Porphyry, chiefly that of Boethius, which differs from the paraphrase. And finally, it distinguishes the commentary of Judah Messer Leon (15 th c. Italy) from its predecessors in its wholescale adaption of Christian commentarial practices.","PeriodicalId":208121,"journal":{"name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"14 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121009763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Towards a Social History of Medieval Logic 中世纪逻辑社会史研究
Studia graeco-arabica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.12871/978883339614921
J. Marenbon
{"title":"Towards a Social History of Medieval Logic","authors":"J. Marenbon","doi":"10.12871/978883339614921","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12871/978883339614921","url":null,"abstract":"This paper explains how a social history of medieval logic might be written. After contrasting it with the Standard Approach, centred on great logicians, problems and debates, it suggests a series of questions which social historians of logic might ask: when, where, by whom, how and why was logic studied in the Middle Ages? There follows a discussion of pathways to the social history of medieval logic: enhanced doxology, institutional history, logic in relation to other disciplines and cultural comparison. Finally, an objection is considered: logic is discovered, not invented, and so social explanations are inappropriate for its history. The objection is rejected because, whether logic is discovered or invented, historians of it must explain how individual logicians came to think and write as they did, and such explanations include social factors among others.","PeriodicalId":208121,"journal":{"name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126715491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Des quatre questions aristotéliciennes au tawḥīd - Notes sur les origines de la théologie négative en Islam 四个aristotéliciennes问题向tawḥīd - Islam起源神学注释为负值
Studia graeco-arabica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.12871/97888333974743
Michael Chase
{"title":"Des quatre questions aristotéliciennes au tawḥīd - Notes sur les origines de la théologie négative en Islam","authors":"Michael Chase","doi":"10.12871/97888333974743","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12871/97888333974743","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":208121,"journal":{"name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"26 43","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114044012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The “Conjunction” of the Intellect with the Separate Substances and God: The Greek and Graeco-Arabic Background 知性与分离的物质和上帝的“结合”:希腊和希腊-阿拉伯背景
Studia graeco-arabica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.12871/97888333961496
C. D’Ancona
{"title":"The “Conjunction” of the Intellect with the Separate Substances and God: The Greek and Graeco-Arabic Background","authors":"C. D’Ancona","doi":"10.12871/97888333961496","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12871/97888333961496","url":null,"abstract":"The Neoplatonic interpretation of Plato’s Cave assumes that beyond discursive reason there is in the soul a power to grasp the intelligible Forms and the first principle: the One, or the Good. In itself beyond knowledge, the One-Good is nevertheless present to the human soul as the ultimate foundation of knowledge which is made possible by the Forms. The perfect simplicity of the One-Good implies transcendence with respect to knowledge; however, the soul can have a grasp of it, provided that it raises itself to the non-discursive mode of knowledge which is typical of the Intellect – a separate substance whose nature is intellection. This Neoplatonic interpretation of Plato’s doctrine of knowledge reached the Latin Middle Ages through various channels and fueled the idea that our mind can indeed get direct acquaintance with the supra-sensible realm and its ultimate principle, God. Surprisingly enough, in the philosophical culture of the Middle Ages, both Arabic and Latin, this account was not seen as incompatible with the Aristotelian theory of knowledge, although the latter is based on abstraction from sense perception and does not grant any contact between the human mind and the Unmoved Mover. This article explores the roots of the medieval intermingling of the Aristotelian and Neoplatonic epistemologies which occurs, in particular, in the theory of the “conjunction” of our mind with the intelligible realm. Based on Alexander of Aphrodisias’ exegesis of the De Anima , this theory originates in Arabic philosophy. Here Alexander and Plotinus merge together in the creation of the so-called ʿaql mustafād / intellectus adeptus .","PeriodicalId":208121,"journal":{"name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126283476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abū l-Barakāt al-Baġdādī and the Traditions of Arabic Logic aby l-Barakāt al-Baġdādī和阿拉伯逻辑的传统
Studia graeco-arabica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.12871/978883339614913
T. Street
{"title":"Abū l-Barakāt al-Baġdādī and the Traditions of Arabic Logic","authors":"T. Street","doi":"10.12871/978883339614913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12871/978883339614913","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":208121,"journal":{"name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"299 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124276689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Metaphysics of Trinity in Graeco-Syriac Miaphysitism: A Study and Analysis of the Trinitarian Florilegium in MS British Library Add. 14532 希腊-叙利亚玄学三位一体的形而上学:对MS大英图书馆三位一体花谱的研究与分析，第14532卷
Studia graeco-arabica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.12871/97888333961493
Bishara Ebeid
{"title":"Metaphysics of Trinity in Graeco-Syriac Miaphysitism: A Study and Analysis of the Trinitarian Florilegium in MS British Library Add. 14532","authors":"Bishara Ebeid","doi":"10.12871/97888333961493","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12871/97888333961493","url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to study and analyse the Trinitarian doctrine of a Syriac Patristic florilegium of Trinitarian content found in MS London, British Library, Add. 14532, in an attempt to understand the reasons that led to its composition. It will include an analysis of the development of Miaphysite metaphysics during the sixth and the seventh centuries, when the Miaphysites had to deal with various internal controversies, and an analytical presentation of the florilegium and of its contents, with an identification of the patristic quotations used by the compiler. The study of the theology and metaphysics of this florilegium will go on to demonstrate that the Miaphysites, starting from their Christology and the problems it created in their Trinitarian doctrine, formulated a metaphysical system based on a new comprehension of “substance”, “hypostasis”, “property” and “monarchy” and developed what I call “Miaphysite Trinitarian doctrine”.","PeriodicalId":208121,"journal":{"name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122181489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rémanences néoplatoniciennes dans un commentaire judéo-arabe sur le Cantique des cantiques 犹太-阿拉伯对《歌之歌》评论中的新柏拉图主义残余
Studia graeco-arabica Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.12871/97888333974747
P. Fenton
{"title":"Rémanences néoplatoniciennes dans un commentaire judéo-arabe sur le Cantique des cantiques","authors":"P. Fenton","doi":"10.12871/97888333974747","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12871/97888333974747","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":208121,"journal":{"name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130191383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书