{"title":"Francis Basset, 1st Baron De Dunstanville and Baron Basset of Stratton, and his mineral specimens at the Bath Royal Literary and Scientific Institution and the Natural History Museum, London","authors":"T. Cotterell, M. Williams","doi":"10.55468/gc1478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55468/gc1478","url":null,"abstract":"A small suite of historically significant Cornish minerals are recorded as having been donated to the Bath Royal Literary and Scientific Institution (BRLSI) by Lord De Dunstanville in 1826. Only sixteen specimens are extant but their quality, and the fact that they appeared to represent the largest known suite of mineral specimens owned by Francis Basset, 1st Baron De Dunstanville and Baron Basset of Stratton (1757-1835), marked them out as being of significance and worthy of further study. Subsequent investigations revealed a second, slightly larger suite of mineral specimens attributed to Lord De Dunstanville in the 'Russell Collection' within the Natural History Museum (NHM), London. This second suite was almost exclusively given by him to his sister-in-law, Lady Elizabeth Anne Coxe Hippisley (1760-1843), of Ston Easton Park, Somerset, in 1810-1811, thus providing a link to the city of Bath. The BRLSI specimens are described in detail and reviewed in comparison to the NHM specimens. In total fifty-four specimens with associations to Lord De Dunstanville are documented.","PeriodicalId":203203,"journal":{"name":"Geological Curator","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125816475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A geological tale of two cities: Cuvier and Brongniart's map of Paris (1811) and Conybeare and De la Beche's map of Bath (1823)","authors":"K. Cook","doi":"10.55468/gc1477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55468/gc1477","url":null,"abstract":"This comparison of two early geological maps, Cuvier and Brongniart's 1811 map of Paris and Conybeare and De la Beche's 1823 map of Bath, explores their publication history, the connections between their French and English authors, and the design and reproduction of the maps. The Paris map was much published and is well known for Brongniart's use of associated fossils to identify the geological formations shown on it, while the Bath map survives in only a few copies and is little known. Nevertheless, the Bath map is interesting as one of the first geological maps to combine area patterns printed in colour with hand-applied area colours to distinguish and relate the geological formations on the map. The Paris map is rightly famous for its compilation and geological content, but the Bath map deserves recognition for its innovative symbolization and use of intaglio colour printing.","PeriodicalId":203203,"journal":{"name":"Geological Curator","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125343265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Pyrite decay - into the great unknown","authors":"C. Baars","doi":"10.55468/gc409","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55468/gc409","url":null,"abstract":"More than 200 years of research have brought us little closer to understanding, let alone controlling, pyrite oxidation in geological collections. This appears paradoxical, because thousands of papers have been written on the deterioration of iron sulfides by geochemists, engineers and conservators. But whilst reaction products and pathways are characterised well, the causes of deterioration of different types of iron sulfide specimens in geological collections remain elusive. To make matters even more complicated for the museum conservator, published guidelines for the management of such specimens are patchy and often contradictory. Currently available condition assessment methodologies are barely suitable for routine monitoring of large collections, results of specimen monitoring exercises are not necessarily replicable, and, in the absence of guidance on suitable storage conditions, triggers for, and suitability of, conservation actions are difficult to determine. A new approach is required to end the guess work and add some substance, based on evidence, to the collection care of geological collections in museums. This paper does not answer these questions but introduces a framework for a research agenda that would underpin a robust approach to the delivery of preventive conservation of geological collections. This includes a definition of what kind of material change in minerals constitutes damage; categorisation of damage/change; development of a protocol for routine condition assessments; the definition of an adequate storage environment; and testing rigorously the suitability of conservation treatments.","PeriodicalId":203203,"journal":{"name":"Geological Curator","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122843348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The role of pyrite in fossilisation and its potential instability","authors":"K. Miles","doi":"10.55468/gc402","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55468/gc402","url":null,"abstract":"Pyrite often forms in organic-rich marine sediments through bacterial action. Bacteria reduce organics to form bisulphide, which reacts in turn with dissolved iron in seawater to form pyrite. Consequently, it is frequently found in stratigraphic formations that consist of marine clays. Pyrite can be involved in fossilisation through a number of ways, including complete replacement, as infill in permineralised bone, or simply as microcrystals finely disseminated through the fossil and matrix. Replacement by pyrite can often be easily recognised: the fossil may have a gold or brassy metallic lustre. Infill is harder to recognise, and disseminated pyrite even more so. Pyrite in fossils may be stable or unstable- in its stable form, pyritised fossils will generally retain their shiny, metallic appearance. Pyrite preservation and stability can vary even within the same specimen. Fossils preserved in pyrite can be prone to oxidation, particularly at high relative humidities. There are a number of signs that indicate oxidation is occurring, depending on the severity of the condition. One or more of the following may be present: a sulphurous smell, white or yellow powdery crystals on the surface of the specimen, expansion cracks, as well as acid burns on associated labels, boxes and drawers. Such burns often have a characteristic ovoid appearance. If left unchecked, pyrite oxidation can completely destroy a specimen and its labels.","PeriodicalId":203203,"journal":{"name":"Geological Curator","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128888322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Keep calm and call the conservator: it is only pyrite decay and your specimen may be salvageable","authors":"N. Larkin","doi":"10.55468/gc406","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55468/gc406","url":null,"abstract":"You may discover a specimen in your collection that is suffering from pyrite decay and it may already appear to be too late to save it. However, a pile of ash-like substance in a card tray might look like it is destined only for the bin but careful cleaning and simple stabilisation techniques may reveal a useful specimen underneath. If so, record it as fully as possible as soon as possible using either traditional techniques (photography and/or moulding and casting) or by using modern techniques such as photogrammetry, CTscanning, Micro CTscanning or laser scanning as the specimen will be prone to further deterioration in the future.","PeriodicalId":203203,"journal":{"name":"Geological Curator","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133391305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Dendermonde Mammoth: fighting pyrite decay and the preservation of unique paleontological heritage","authors":"Anthonie Hellemond","doi":"10.55468/gc408","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55468/gc408","url":null,"abstract":"The Dendermonde mammoth is a unique skeleton of a woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) which was found between 1968-1969, in the area around the city of Dendermonde (Oost-Vlaanderen - Belgium). This 29,000 year old skeleton was mounted in 1975 by its finder Hugo De Potter in the attic of the 'Vleeshuismuseum'. The skeleton consists of ca. 74 original elements. Some of these elements originate from the Hofstade collection of the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences in Brussels (RBINS). Since 1990 the skeleton has not been chemically treated and no monitoring of temperature or relative humidity took place. As a result of years of exposure and lack of any treatment, the bones of the Dendermonde mammoth were covered with a thick layer of dust and affected by pyrite decay. The skeleton was showing several visual outbursts of pyrite blooming out of the fossilised cartilage as well as numerous desiccation cracks. By the end of March 2017 the Belgian Paleontological Association (BVP), the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences (RBINS) and the city museum of Dendermonde (Stedelijk museum Dendermonde) decided to restore the skeleton in order to preserve an important piece of Belgian paleontological heritage.","PeriodicalId":203203,"journal":{"name":"Geological Curator","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125129553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Prehistoric human material in the Nottingham Natural History Museum, and the Cresswell Crags Museum and Heritage Centre","authors":"N. Mantl","doi":"10.55468/gc412","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55468/gc412","url":null,"abstract":"The Creswell Crags Museum and Heritage Centre (CCMHC) and the Nottingham Natural History Museum, Wollaton Hall (NOTNH) both curate collections of prehistoric human material that have undergone limited documentation. The condition of current records demanded revision, which this study will perform. Reported here are nine cranial, and five postcranial Neolithic and late Iron Age human bone specimens, as well as two teeth, collected at the CCMHC from the late 19th century excavation of the caves of the gorge and nearby area. Three crania, and three post cranial human bone fragments dating to the late Pleistocene are present among the NOTNH collection; these originate from various locations in the East Midlands. This paper offers a revised account of the material, providing detailed osteological descriptions, and biological profiling of sex, age, pathology and taphonomy; where possible historical backgrounds, and radiocarbon dating information are included in this report. Overall the specimens were found to be in fair condition, while the collections' records of the material required minor corrections.","PeriodicalId":203203,"journal":{"name":"Geological Curator","volume":"187 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123001271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Comparing sulphamic acid to acetic and formic acids for the preparation of large mesozoic marine reptile fossils, and a method for monitoring residual acid and salt removal following acid preparation","authors":"L. Noè, M. Gómez-Pérez, S. Padilla-Bernal","doi":"10.55468/gc411","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55468/gc411","url":null,"abstract":"Chemical preparation is an important technique in palaeontology that uses a dilute aqueous acid solution to remove calcareous matrix from fossils, but which leads to the evolution of salts as a by-product. Acid preparation is usually undertaken using formic and acetic acids, whereas sulphamic acid has only rarely been considered. Sulphamic acid is a strong acid, with many industrial uses, but which has fewer health and safety concerns, and produces fewer irritant fumes, than formic or acetic acids. Three comparative procedures were undertaken to understand the action of sulphamic acid in relation to formic and acetic acids, using calcareous matrix from Colombian (South American) large Mesozoic marine reptiles. The results of these procedures indicate sulphamic acid acts in a comparable manner to formic acid, and more rapidly than acetic acid, in terms of rate of matrix removal. Afourth procedure investigated the removal of acid and salt residues following sulphamic acid preparation of a Colombian large Mesozoic marine reptile fossil, a process essential for the long-term survival of any acid prepared specimen. The fossil was immersed in type 1 deionized water, and increasing electrical conductivity was used as a proxy for ionic leaching. The results imply the preparators 'rule of thumb' of soaking a specimen in water for three times the length of time spent in the acid solution, is inadequate to ensure satisfactory removal of acid and salt residues. Although tested on a specimen prepared using sulphamic acid, the technique for post-preparation ion removal is equally be applicable to all fossils prepared using sulphamic, formic or acetic acids in aqueous solution.","PeriodicalId":203203,"journal":{"name":"Geological Curator","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127555740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}