S. Schweigert-Recksiek, J. Trauer, Carsten Engel, K. Spreitzer, Markus Zimmermann
{"title":"CONCEPTION OF A DIGITAL TWIN IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING – A CASE STUDY IN TECHNICAL PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT","authors":"S. Schweigert-Recksiek, J. Trauer, Carsten Engel, K. Spreitzer, Markus Zimmermann","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.23","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A Digital Twin as a virtual representation of a physical system is becoming a key technology. While potential benefits are evident, there is no approach in literature or practice comprehensively supporting its introduction. In an industrial case study, a generic procedure model for the conception and implementation of a Digital Twin was developed. The relations between use cases, usage data, and virtual models resulted in a target concept as well as requirements for the implementation. Thereby, companies can access the potentials of a Digital Twin taking into account their specific situation.","PeriodicalId":202608,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127789318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"SUPPORTING ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT THROUGH CONSTRAINT MODELLING IN EARLY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN: A SATELLITE PROPULSION CASE STUDY","authors":"O. Borgue, F. Valjak, M. Panarotto, O. Isaksson","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.289","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.289","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Function and constraints modelling are implemented to design two gridded ion thrusters for additive manufacturing (AM). One concept takes advantage of AM design freedom, disregarding AM limitations and is not feasible. The other concept considers AM limitations and is manufacturable and feasible. Constraints modelling highlights AM capabilities that can be improved, showing where future investment is needed. Constraints representation can also support the creation of technology development roadmaps able to identify areas of AM technologies that must be improved.","PeriodicalId":202608,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference","volume":"4039 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127546814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"ASSESSING THE FUTURE: METHODS AND CRITERIA","authors":"I. Gräßler, H. Thiele, P. Scholle","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.278","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.278","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As time-to-market is getting shorter, customer needs have to be identified as early as possible in product development. Correctly applied, corporate foresight can give a glimpse into the future to anticipate such needs and thus gain a competitive advantage. A support tool to choose the appropriate method of foresight is not available yet. Thus, a literature study on foresight methods in industry is performed and a novel decision support tool is proposed which avoids high entrepreneurial risks. Based on the findings, potentials for future work are identified for different types of methods.","PeriodicalId":202608,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132671374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A FRAMEWORK FOR TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN DESIGN: CRITICALITY AND COMFORT ZONE FOR EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES","authors":"P. Krus, L. Pereira","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.281","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.281","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper proposes an analytical framework for estimating the domain where a type of technology can be used in a system. In order to achieve this aim, we have elaborated on the concepts of technology critical, technology sensitive, and the technology comfort zone, to analytically assess the impact of a new technology in the early phases of system design. The result is a general method to indicate the range of requirements that can result in valid designs. This tool can assist in the decision-making processes for technology portfolio selection based on sustainable principles.","PeriodicalId":202608,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134381975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"THE IMPORTANCE OF CONSIDERING FLEET SIZE IN THE LIFECYCLE COST ANALYSIS OF PRODUCT SERVICE SYSTEMS","authors":"J. Schneider, M. Gatzen, R. Lachmayer","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.284","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The use of product-service systems business models is increasing in today's economy. Because the products that provide the service to the customers incur cost during their lifetime, the method of lifecycle costing finds wide-spread use. However, this paper shows the current methods have some inaccuracies when determining lifecycle costs. The methods do not consider the required number of products necessary to provide the offered service to the customers. This paper describes a new framework for lifecycle costing that includes these cost components.","PeriodicalId":202608,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133167155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. C. Fernandes, D. Pigosso, T. Mcaloone, H. Rozenfeld
{"title":"VALUE PROPOSITION OF PRODUCT-SERVICE SYSTEMS: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY TO COMPARE TWO DIFFERENT DESIGN APPROACHES","authors":"S. C. Fernandes, D. Pigosso, T. Mcaloone, H. Rozenfeld","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.84","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.84","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The development of product-service systems (PSS) requires the design of value propositions, which involves challenging activities. In the context of business model innovation, gamification is presented as a practical mechanism to support the design process. This study aims to create a prototype of a gamified approach to design PSS value propositions and to compare its application to a traditional design approach. Based on a design experiment, the advantages and problems for both approaches were evaluated, providing insights for further development of the new version of the gamified approach.","PeriodicalId":202608,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132965029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. Weinreich, T. Sahin, D. Inkermann, T. Huth, T. Vietor
{"title":"MANAGING DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION BY VALUE-ORIENTED PORTFOLIO PLANNING","authors":"S. Weinreich, T. Sahin, D. Inkermann, T. Huth, T. Vietor","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.155","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Innovation portfolio management (IPM) aims at selecting ideas with regard to their potential for innovation and measuring them considering customer and business value. The evaluation of benefits and risk is especially challenging for disruptive innovation (DI) due to their characteristics such as low comparability to existing technologies and uncertain customer reactions. This paper highlights the lack of approaches to managing DI in IPM and addresses it through a framework that expands the understanding of value-orientation in IPM, allowing for the inclusion of DI.","PeriodicalId":202608,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133904238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"ON PROTOTYPING METHODS TO LEVERAGE NON-RIGID MATERIALS IN THE EARLY STAGES OF ENGINEERING DESIGN","authors":"M. Auflem, H. Bøe, J. Erichsen, M. Steinert","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.120","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Prototyping has been shown important to facilitate learning, inform decisions and to communicate ideas in engineering design. However, it is not evident which methods, tools and materials to use, as prototyping is practised differently across development contexts, and stages. In the early stages of design, different choices in prototyping methods, tools and materials all affect prototyping outcome. This paper is focused on prototyping methods in the context of early stages of design and attempts to highlight identified strengths and limitations of using non-rigid materials for prototyping.","PeriodicalId":202608,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114073851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. Üreten, Matthias Eisenmann, Thomas Nelius, E. Garrelts, Dieter Krause, Sven Matthiesen
{"title":"CURRENT CHALLENGES AND SOLUTION APPROACHES IN EMPIRICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN RESEARCH – A WORKSHOP FOR EMPIRICAL RESEARCH","authors":"S. Üreten, Matthias Eisenmann, Thomas Nelius, E. Garrelts, Dieter Krause, Sven Matthiesen","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.280","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The requirements on validity for studies in design research are very high. Therefore, this paper aims at identifying challenges that occur when setting up studies and suggests solution strategies to address them. Three different institutes combining their experience discussed several studies in a workshop. Resulting main challenges are to find a suitable task, to operationalise the variables and to deal with a high analysis effort per participant. Automation in data evaluation and a detailed practical guideline on studies in design research are considered necessary.","PeriodicalId":202608,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124024208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF INTENT-DESIGN RELATIONSHIP FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DESIGN AGENT MODEL BASED ON PRODUCT PURCHASING PROCESS","authors":"M. Le, E. Jung","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.146","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aims at proposing an AI-agent model that helps designers to understand and interpret clients’ intent and create customized design outcomes. We recorded and analysed the purchasing process of collecting product information, selecting alternative products and making decision to understand the influence of artefacts on the client's intent during the purchasing process and collect the basic data for proposing an AI-agent model. We analysed the process by Linkography and found the relationship between the decision-making patterns and the artefacts that presented by the AI-agent.","PeriodicalId":202608,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127818724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}