Pain Practice最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Prescribers' preferences for triptans in migraine: Insights from the French National Social Security System Open Data. 偏头痛处方者对三苯氧胺的偏好:从法国国家社会保障系统开放数据中获得的启示。
IF 2.5 3区 医学
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13432
Sylvain Redon, Anne Donnet
{"title":"Prescribers' preferences for triptans in migraine: Insights from the French National Social Security System Open Data.","authors":"Sylvain Redon, Anne Donnet","doi":"10.1111/papr.13432","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13432","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142505791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preventing technique-related complications in spinal cord stimulation trials: The Dural Substitute Confetti technique. A retrospective monocentric analysis. 预防脊髓刺激试验中与技术相关的并发症:硬脑膜替代 Confetti 技术。回顾性单中心分析。
IF 2.5 3区 医学
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13426
Alessandro Dario, Luca Ferlendis, Bianca Bossi, Davide Locatelli
{"title":"Preventing technique-related complications in spinal cord stimulation trials: The Dural Substitute Confetti technique. A retrospective monocentric analysis.","authors":"Alessandro Dario, Luca Ferlendis, Bianca Bossi, Davide Locatelli","doi":"10.1111/papr.13426","DOIUrl":"10.1111/papr.13426","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is an established therapy for chronic pain, employing screening trials to identify suitable candidates before implantation. However, complications arising from both technique and medical factors present challenges to this practice. This study introduces the Dural Substitute Confetti technique, which addresses technique-related complications during SCS implantation by preventing scar-induced lead migration or breakage and reducing operating times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis on 174 patients treated with SCS trials from 2017 to 2022 at our institution. Of these, 85.1% proceeded to permanent implantation. During trial surgery, synthetic dural substitutes (DS) were used to protect leads, which remained connected to an external pulse generator (EPG) for 20-28 days (mean 21.4 days). Utilizing the DS Confetti technique, leads were easily dissected from the DS during the second surgery and connected to an internal pulse generator (IPG). We compared complications and surgical times before and after the introduction of this technique in 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the complete SCS trial, patients experienced over 50% pain relief, with an implant-to-trial ratio of 85.1% and a mean follow-up of 52 months. No technique-related complications occurred during the trial period post-2017, while the pre-2017 group had a 3.9% lead migration rate due to scarring, necessitating re-implantation. The average surgery duration decreased from 54 min pre-2017 to 32 min post-2017. Medical-related complications included infections (2.1%) and wound dehiscence (1.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DS Confetti technique prevents scar adhesion formation during screening trials, thereby facilitating and expediting the definitive SCS implantation. Additionally, it may also reduce the risk of lead migration and iatrogenic damage, potentially lowering technique-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142472321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Non-responders to high frequency spinal cord stimulation. 对高频脊髓刺激无反应者。
IF 2.5 3区 医学
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13431
Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Christopher Gilligan
{"title":"Non-responders to high frequency spinal cord stimulation.","authors":"Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Christopher Gilligan","doi":"10.1111/papr.13431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13431","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142505790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and efficacy of long-term use of a buprenorphine transdermal patch system in patients with osteoarthritis and low back pain refractory to non-opioid analgesics: Post-marketing surveillance of 3000 cases. 对非阿片类镇痛药难治的骨关节炎和腰背痛患者长期使用丁丙诺啡透皮贴片系统的安全性和有效性:对 3000 个病例的上市后监测。
IF 2.5 3区 医学
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13430
Takahiro Ushida, Rumiko Kanzaki, Keishi Katayama, Akito Ishikawa
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of long-term use of a buprenorphine transdermal patch system in patients with osteoarthritis and low back pain refractory to non-opioid analgesics: Post-marketing surveillance of 3000 cases.","authors":"Takahiro Ushida, Rumiko Kanzaki, Keishi Katayama, Akito Ishikawa","doi":"10.1111/papr.13430","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13430","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A post-marketing surveillance was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the buprenorphine transdermal patch under actual clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3017 patients included in the safety analysis, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were observed in 1524 (50.5%), the most common being nausea, skin symptoms at the site of application, constipation, and vomiting. The incidences of respiratory depression and withdrawal symptoms were low, and no drug dependence was observed. Among the 2573 patients included in the efficacy analysis, the efficacy (≥2-point improvement in the numerical rating scale) rate was 74.4%, which was significantly higher in older adults (≥65 y.o) than in younger adults. Discontinuation was mostly caused by ADRs during the early initiation phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of long-term administration of buprenorphine transdermal patches, suggesting that pain control is possible over the long term if attention is paid to ADRs in the early stages of administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142472322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of different electric stimulation modalities on pain and functionality of patients with pelvic pain: Systematic review with META-analysis. 不同电刺激模式对骨盆疼痛患者疼痛和功能的影响:系统回顾与 META 分析。
IF 2.5 3区 医学
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13417
Camilla F Mendes, Luciene S Oliveira, Priscila A Garcez, Isabela F Azevedo-Santos, Josimari M DeSantana
{"title":"Effect of different electric stimulation modalities on pain and functionality of patients with pelvic pain: Systematic review with META-analysis.","authors":"Camilla F Mendes, Luciene S Oliveira, Priscila A Garcez, Isabela F Azevedo-Santos, Josimari M DeSantana","doi":"10.1111/papr.13417","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13417","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pelvic pain is located in the anterior abdominal wall, below the umbilical scar. Its treatment includes pharmacological therapy, which can cause adverse effects and is not always sufficient to control symptoms. Thus, the use of adjunct therapies such as electric stimulation has been suggested. Therefore, this review intends to appraise the literature on the effectiveness of electrostimulation in the treatment of pelvic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search for studies was conducted until April 2024 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, SciELO, PEDro, CINAHL, BVS, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using a combination of Mesh terms \"Electric Stimulation\" and \"Pelvic Pain.\" Risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis were performed with The Cochrane Collaboration tool (RevMan 5.4). Quality of the evidence was assessed with GRADE tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 3247 studies found, 19 were included. In the qualitative analysis, seven studies showed TENS, electroacupuncture, PTNS, and tDCS reduced pain intensity, one study on PTNS showed increased quality of life, and one on tDCS showed improved functional performance. However, in the meta-analysis, only TENS showed efficacy for the reduction of acute pelvic pain and primary dysmenorrhea.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that there is moderate-quality evidence for TENS to reduce pain intensity in primary dysmenorrhea and low-quality evidence for the same outcome in acute pelvic pain. Randomized controlled clinical trials with larger sample size and with better methodological quality are needed to establish the effectiveness of other forms of electrical stimulation in pelvic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142472320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comments on "Enhancing contrast distribution with the far lateral approach in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections: A retrospective analysis". 关于 "在腰椎穿孔硬膜外类固醇注射中使用远外侧入路增强造影剂分布:回顾性分析"。
IF 2.5 3区 医学
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13425
Min Cheol Chang, Mathieu Boudier-Revéret, Seoyon Yang
{"title":"Comments on \"Enhancing contrast distribution with the far lateral approach in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections: A retrospective analysis\".","authors":"Min Cheol Chang, Mathieu Boudier-Revéret, Seoyon Yang","doi":"10.1111/papr.13425","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13425","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142472306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing the effectiveness of pregabalin and gabapentin in patients with lumbar radiculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 比较普瑞巴林和加巴喷丁对腰椎病患者的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.5 3区 医学
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13424
Do Yun Kwon, Kwang-Ryeol Kim, Dong Hyuck Kim, Sang Gyu Kwak
{"title":"Comparing the effectiveness of pregabalin and gabapentin in patients with lumbar radiculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Do Yun Kwon, Kwang-Ryeol Kim, Dong Hyuck Kim, Sang Gyu Kwak","doi":"10.1111/papr.13424","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13424","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gabapentinoids are commonly prescribed to control neuropathic pain of lumbar radiculopathy. Few trials have compared the efficacy of gabapentin (GBP) and pregabalin (PGB). Therefore, the authors conducted a meta-analysis to compare the difference in effect between GBP and PGB in lumbar radiculopathy patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles which were published between January 1, 1960 and May 31, 2023 were investigated via Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE. This meta-analysis was conducted on patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Gabapentin was used as an intervention, and pregabalin as a comparison. As outcomes, pain rating scales including visual analog scale (VAS) and numeric pain rating scale (NRS), and number of adverse events (dizziness and sedation) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PGB showed statistically significant improvement in pain scale (VAS and NRS) in short-term follow-up (6 weeks or less) compared to GBP. (Total mean difference of -0.31) However, in the long-term follow-up (6 weeks to 12 weeks), there was no difference in pain reduction effect between two groups. The incidence of AEs showed no difference between two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on this article, the existing evidence suggests that PGB was more effective in reducing pain of lumbar radiculopathy compared to GBP at the short-term follow-up, but there was no difference in the long-term follow-up. Physicians should consider this finding in prescribing medications for patients with lumbar radiculopathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142472319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sentiment analysis of letters of recommendation for a U.S. pain medicine fellowship from 2020 to 2023. 2020 年至 2023 年美国疼痛医学奖学金推荐信的情感分析。
IF 2.5 3区 医学
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13416
Christopher P Cheng, Vikram Vasan, Alopi M Patel, Paul R Shekane
{"title":"Sentiment analysis of letters of recommendation for a U.S. pain medicine fellowship from 2020 to 2023.","authors":"Christopher P Cheng, Vikram Vasan, Alopi M Patel, Paul R Shekane","doi":"10.1111/papr.13416","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13416","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Letters of recommendation (LORs) are an important part of pain medicine fellowship applications that may be subject to implicit bias by the letter's author. This study evaluated letters of recommendation for applications to pain medicine fellowships in the United States to characterize biases and differences among applicants over four application cycles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective single-site cohort study. De-identified LORs were collected from 2020 to 2023 from one institution. The Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner (VADER) natural language processing package scored positive LOR sentiment. In addition, the deep learning tool, Empath, scored LORs for 15 sentiments. Wilcoxon rank-sum and one-way ANOVA tests compared scores between applicant demographics: gender, race, medical school type, residency specialty, and chief resident status, as well as letter writers' academic position.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine hundred and sixty-four applications were studied over four application cycles. Program directors wrote fewer words (p = 0.020) and less positively (p < 0.001) compared to department chairs and letter writers with neither position. Department chairs wrote with less \"negative emotion\" compared to both program directors and writers with neither position (p < 0.001). Anesthesiologist applicants received more letters highlighting \"achievement\" (p < 0.001) while PM&R applicants submitted letters with less \"negative emotion\" (p < 0.001) compared to other specialties. Chief residents' letters scored higher in \"leader\" sentiment (p < 0.001) and lower in \"negative emotion\" (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Linguistic content did not favor certain genders or races over others. However, disparities in LORs do exist depending on an applicant's specialty and chief resident status, as well as the academic status of the letter writer.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
8. Herpes zoster and post herpetic neuralgia. 8.带状疱疹和疱疹后神经痛。
IF 2.5 3区 医学
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13423
Elisabeth J M Adriaansen, Julien G Jacobs, Lisette M Vernooij, Albert J M van Wijck, Steven P Cohen, Frank J P M Huygen, Mienke Rijsdijk
{"title":"8. Herpes zoster and post herpetic neuralgia.","authors":"Elisabeth J M Adriaansen, Julien G Jacobs, Lisette M Vernooij, Albert J M van Wijck, Steven P Cohen, Frank J P M Huygen, Mienke Rijsdijk","doi":"10.1111/papr.13423","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13423","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients suffering from postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) report unilateral chronic pain in one or more dermatomes after an acute herpes zoster (HZ) infection. The incidence of acute HZ ranges between three and five patients per 1000 person-years. In one out of four patients, acute HZ-related pain will transition into PHN. PHN can be very disabling for patients and reduce quality of life. Additionally, the treatment of PHN is characterized by high failure rates. The aim of this review is to give an update on the previous practical guideline published in 2011 and revised in 2015 (published in 2019) and to provide an overview of current interventional treatment options for HZ infection and PHN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of HZ and PHN was systematically reviewed and summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most important treatment for acute HZ-related pain is antiviral therapy within 72 h of symptom onset. Additional symptomatic treatment options are analgesic drugs according to the WHO pain ladder, tricyclic antidepressants (eg, nortriptyline), and antiepileptic drugs (eg, gabapentin). If pain is not sufficiently reduced, interventional treatment such as an epidural injection with local anesthetics and corticosteroids or pulsed radiofrequency of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) are options. Treatment for PHN is preferably transdermal capsaicin, lidocaine, or oral drugs such as antidepressants or antiepileptics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment of acute HZ-related pain especially PHN is challenging. Besides the conventional treatment for PHN, interventional management is considered a new treatment option. PRF of DRG seems to be the most promising interventional management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adherence to ESMO guidelines on cancer pain management and their applicability to specialist palliative care centers: An observational, prospective, and multicenter study. ESMO癌症疼痛管理指南的遵守情况及其对专科姑息治疗中心的适用性:一项观察性、前瞻性和多中心研究。
IF 2.5 3区 医学
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13418
L Carbonara, G Casale, M G De Marinis, C Bosetti, A Valle, P Carinci, M R D'andrea, O Corli
{"title":"Adherence to ESMO guidelines on cancer pain management and their applicability to specialist palliative care centers: An observational, prospective, and multicenter study.","authors":"L Carbonara, G Casale, M G De Marinis, C Bosetti, A Valle, P Carinci, M R D'andrea, O Corli","doi":"10.1111/papr.13418","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pain management in late-stage cancer patients is a complex clinical problem. The historical guidelines were from the World Health Organization (WHO). Recently, ESMO produced guidelines consistent with 52 recommendations applicable to the entire period of disease since the pain appears.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the appropriateness and applicability of ESMO guidelines (EGL) in advanced cancer patients admitted to palliative care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An observational, prospective, multicentric study conducted by specialist palliative care centers on cancer patients in the advanced stage. The 52 recommendations were divided into eight macro areas. The adherence levels were expressed as a percentage for each recommendation and have been broken down as high (>75%), medium (50%-75%), and low (<50%). In the case of not adhering to a recommendation, the comment was \"not applicable\" (NA) or not evaluable (NE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred seventy-six patients were enrolled in the study. Thirty-five recommendations were considered NA or NE, especially because their application took too long to achieve clinical results, given the condition of the patients. Some interesting opinions on the choice of drugs emerged. At the end of the study, pain dropped from 5.0 to 2.6, patients' satisfaction increased from 3.3 to 4.6, and quality of life improved from 4.4 to 5.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palliative physicians' adherence to EGL was medium. The main contribution of this study was to evaluate their applicability and clinical results in far-advanced patients assisted by palliative care. The selection of useful recommendations and expert opinions can make a contribution to clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142366200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信