Jason Parmar, Aila Malik, Gelilla Zemmedhun, Saba Javed
{"title":"Short-term clinical outcomes and safety of the SpineJack implant system for the treatment of pathological vertebral compression fractures in cancer patients: A retrospective analysis.","authors":"Jason Parmar, Aila Malik, Gelilla Zemmedhun, Saba Javed","doi":"10.1111/papr.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The SpineJack implant system is an FDA-approved treatment modality for vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) with reported clinical efficacy comparable to the gold-standard balloon kyphoplasty. Specifically, there is insufficient literature regarding the treatment and safety outcomes of the SpineJack when analyzing a specific subset of patients such as the cancer population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an institutional-level retrospective study at a cancer center on the SpineJack implant consisting of 67 cancer patients (mean age 64 ± 13 years) undergoing a total of 94 SpineJack implantations inserted at 15 thoracolumbar vertebral levels for the treatment of pathologic vertebral compression fractures. The primary outcome of the study was the change in pain score based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the secondary outcome was the change in opioid requirement based on morphine milligram equivalents (MME). The average follow-up period was 2 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-procedure, a statistically significant decrease in pain severity was observed, with the mean pain score improving from 7.72 ± 2.29 points to 3.45 ± 2.55 points (p-value < 0.0001). Additionally, a reduction in opioid requirement was noted, with a decrease in MME from 66.42 ± 92.66 mg preoperatively to 43.1 ± 60.78 mg (p-value < 0.0001) postoperatively. There was a 1.5% (N = 1) incidence of adjacent level fracture (ALF) reported over an average of 2-week follow-up. The most common intraoperative complication reported was cement extravasation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, treatment of cancer patients with pathologic fractures using the SpineJack procedure resulted in remarkably decreased pain scores, overall decreased MME requirements, a significantly low incidence of ALF (s), and minor intraoperative complications without long-term consequences. The SpineJack procedure is a clinically effective, low-risk treatment option for cancer patients with symptomatic, pathologic VCFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":"25 3","pages":"e70020"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.70020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Short-term clinical outcomes and safety of the SpineJack implant system for the treatment of pathological vertebral compression fractures in cancer patients: A retrospective analysis.
Background: The SpineJack implant system is an FDA-approved treatment modality for vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) with reported clinical efficacy comparable to the gold-standard balloon kyphoplasty. Specifically, there is insufficient literature regarding the treatment and safety outcomes of the SpineJack when analyzing a specific subset of patients such as the cancer population.
Methods: This is an institutional-level retrospective study at a cancer center on the SpineJack implant consisting of 67 cancer patients (mean age 64 ± 13 years) undergoing a total of 94 SpineJack implantations inserted at 15 thoracolumbar vertebral levels for the treatment of pathologic vertebral compression fractures. The primary outcome of the study was the change in pain score based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the secondary outcome was the change in opioid requirement based on morphine milligram equivalents (MME). The average follow-up period was 2 weeks.
Results: Post-procedure, a statistically significant decrease in pain severity was observed, with the mean pain score improving from 7.72 ± 2.29 points to 3.45 ± 2.55 points (p-value < 0.0001). Additionally, a reduction in opioid requirement was noted, with a decrease in MME from 66.42 ± 92.66 mg preoperatively to 43.1 ± 60.78 mg (p-value < 0.0001) postoperatively. There was a 1.5% (N = 1) incidence of adjacent level fracture (ALF) reported over an average of 2-week follow-up. The most common intraoperative complication reported was cement extravasation.
Conclusion: Overall, treatment of cancer patients with pathologic fractures using the SpineJack procedure resulted in remarkably decreased pain scores, overall decreased MME requirements, a significantly low incidence of ALF (s), and minor intraoperative complications without long-term consequences. The SpineJack procedure is a clinically effective, low-risk treatment option for cancer patients with symptomatic, pathologic VCFs.
期刊介绍：
Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
