发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Social Policy Review 31最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Local variations in implementing energy-efficiency policy: how third sector organisations influenced cities’ responses to the Green Deal 执行能源效率政策的地方差异:第三部门组织如何影响城市对绿色协议的反应
Social Policy Review 31 Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447343981.003.0009
R. Ince
{"title":"Local variations in implementing energy-efficiency policy: how third sector organisations influenced cities’ responses to the Green Deal","authors":"R. Ince","doi":"10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447343981.003.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447343981.003.0009","url":null,"abstract":"Between 2011 and 2016 – the Green Deal era - the UK government encouraged owner occupied households to retrofit their properties, to improve energy efficiency and contribute to reducing carbon emissions, improving energy security and boosting economic development. The ‘Green Deal’ (a finance mechanism and accreditation scheme) the Energy Companies Obligation (a legal requirement for energy companies to fund energy efficiency) and a growing localism agenda were the dominant policies of the era. The Green Deal was implemented through a process of socio-technical experimentation by local coalitions of actors including local authorities, third sector organisations and private sector companies.\u0000This chapter investigates place-based variations in responding to Green Deal policy using three case studies in Bristol, Birmingham and Manchester, and explores the particular contribution that third sector organisations made to each response. These reflections are relevant not only for energy policy but also for other fields delivering policy through localised networks, with often contested interests and priorities.","PeriodicalId":193794,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy Review 31","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121139036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Towards a whole-economy approach to the welfare state: citizens, corporations and the state within the broad welfare mix 朝着福利国家的整体经济方法:在广泛的福利组合中，公民、公司和国家
Social Policy Review 31 Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447343981.003.0004
E. Heins, K. Farnsworth
{"title":"Towards a whole-economy approach to the welfare state: citizens, corporations and the state within the broad welfare mix","authors":"E. Heins, K. Farnsworth","doi":"10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447343981.003.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447343981.003.0004","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter argues for a broadening of social policy focus, beyond the mixed economy approach (which incorporates social, private, informal/familial, voluntary, fiscal and occupational welfare) towards a whole economy approach that ‘brings in’ corporate welfare and a broader focus on taxation, public policies that overlap with social policy objectives, power and the economy.","PeriodicalId":193794,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy Review 31","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122667011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
From welfare state to participation society: austerity, ideology or rhetoric? 从福利国家到参与型社会:紧缩、意识形态还是修辞?
Social Policy Review 31 Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447343981.003.0005
E. Heins, M. Fenger, Babs Broekema
{"title":"From welfare state to participation society: austerity, ideology or rhetoric?","authors":"E. Heins, M. Fenger, Babs Broekema","doi":"10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447343981.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447343981.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"In his first annual speech to parliament in 2013, Dutch King Willem-Alexander announced the end of the era of the welfare state and proclaimed the Participation Society. He stated that the process of individualization, combined with the need to reduce the government's budget deficit leads “to a slow transition of the classical welfare state into a participation society. Everyone who is able to do so, is asked to take responsibility for his or her own life and environment”. This shift towards a participation society is not unique for the Netherlands. Many European countries have experience reforms of their welfare states that limit the responsibility of the state and increases the responsibility of individual citizens. This chapter discusses the backgrounds of Dutch Participation Society in the political discourse, and analyses how and to what extent the ideas of the Participation Society have actually been translated into the content of social policies, their implementation and their consequences.","PeriodicalId":193794,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy Review 31","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126405722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
From the Windrush Generation to the ‘Air Jamaica generation’: local authority support for families with no recourse to public funds 从疾风一代到“牙买加航空一代”:地方政府为没有公共资金的家庭提供支持
Social Policy Review 31 Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447343981.003.0006
J. Rees, Catherine Needham, A. Jolly
{"title":"From the Windrush Generation to the ‘Air Jamaica generation’: local authority support for families with no recourse to public funds","authors":"J. Rees, Catherine Needham, A. Jolly","doi":"10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447343981.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447343981.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"The ‘Air Jamaica generation’ of migrants to the UK over the past 30 years has received less political and scholarly attention than the so-called Windrush generation. Children of this generation are often invisible in social policy discussions because they lack the legal right to paid employment, and are subject to the no recourse to public funds (NRPF) rule. This excludes them from accessing welfare provision, including most social security benefits, council housing and homelessness assistance. This chapter examines support under section 17 of the Children Act 1989, one of the few welfare entitlements which children and families with NRPF retain, arguing that, without access to mainstream social security, section 17 is an inadequate safety net to prevent poverty. The chapter concludes that this is rooted in discriminatory legislation and policy, resulting in situations which, while structural in cause, would be viewed as neglectful if perpetrated by a parent or carer.","PeriodicalId":193794,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy Review 31","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126230741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Alt-Right ‘cultural purity’, ideology and mainstream social policy discourse: 另类右翼“文化纯洁性”、意识形态与主流社会政策话语:
Social Policy Review 31 Pub Date : 2018-12-19 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvkwnq5n.13
Julia Lux, Jd Jordan
{"title":"Alt-Right ‘cultural purity’, ideology and mainstream social policy discourse:","authors":"Julia Lux, Jd Jordan","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvkwnq5n.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkwnq5n.13","url":null,"abstract":"A series of journalistic books and articles exploring the Alt-Right provide detailed empirical data critical to understanding the underpinning social networks of the Alt-Right. However, intensive media focus on young, working-class – usually American – white supremacists sharing extremist material over the internet masks incidences of closely related racist, conspiracist, misogynist, and ‘anti-elitist’ ideology in wider, often middle-class mainstream media, politics, and social policy discourse. This article problematises these narratives. Drawing partly on the work of Mary Douglas and Antonio Gramsci, we contribute to ongoing national and international ‘Alt-Right’ debates with an interdisciplinary, political-anthropological model of ‘mainstremeist’ belief and action. This approach highlights the links between ‘fringe’ and ‘centre’ into an entangled social network seeking to deploy social policy as a tool of misogynist, patriarchal, racist, and classist retrenchment.","PeriodicalId":193794,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy Review 31","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130303400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信