From the Windrush Generation to the ‘Air Jamaica generation’: local authority support for families with no recourse to public funds

J. Rees, Catherine Needham, A. Jolly
{"title":"From the Windrush Generation to the ‘Air Jamaica generation’: local authority support for families with no recourse to public funds","authors":"J. Rees, Catherine Needham, A. Jolly","doi":"10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447343981.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ‘Air Jamaica generation’ of migrants to the UK over the past 30 years has received less political and scholarly attention than the so-called Windrush generation. Children of this generation are often invisible in social policy discussions because they lack the legal right to paid employment, and are subject to the no recourse to public funds (NRPF) rule. This excludes them from accessing welfare provision, including most social security benefits, council housing and homelessness assistance. This chapter examines support under section 17 of the Children Act 1989, one of the few welfare entitlements which children and families with NRPF retain, arguing that, without access to mainstream social security, section 17 is an inadequate safety net to prevent poverty. The chapter concludes that this is rooted in discriminatory legislation and policy, resulting in situations which, while structural in cause, would be viewed as neglectful if perpetrated by a parent or carer.","PeriodicalId":193794,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy Review 31","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy Review 31","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447343981.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The ‘Air Jamaica generation’ of migrants to the UK over the past 30 years has received less political and scholarly attention than the so-called Windrush generation. Children of this generation are often invisible in social policy discussions because they lack the legal right to paid employment, and are subject to the no recourse to public funds (NRPF) rule. This excludes them from accessing welfare provision, including most social security benefits, council housing and homelessness assistance. This chapter examines support under section 17 of the Children Act 1989, one of the few welfare entitlements which children and families with NRPF retain, arguing that, without access to mainstream social security, section 17 is an inadequate safety net to prevent poverty. The chapter concludes that this is rooted in discriminatory legislation and policy, resulting in situations which, while structural in cause, would be viewed as neglectful if perpetrated by a parent or carer.
从疾风一代到“牙买加航空一代”:地方政府为没有公共资金的家庭提供支持
在过去的30年里,移民到英国的“牙买加航空一代”受到的政治和学术关注比所谓的“风吹一代”要少。这一代的子女在社会政策讨论中往往是隐形的,因为他们缺乏获得有薪就业的合法权利,而且受制于不得动用公共资金的规定。这使他们无法获得福利,包括大多数社会保障福利、理事会住房和无家可归者援助。本章审查了1989年《儿童法》第17条所规定的支助,这是拥有自然退休基金的儿童和家庭保留的少数福利权利之一,并认为,如果无法获得主流社会保障,第17条是一个不足以防止贫困的安全网。本章的结论是,这种情况的根源是歧视性的立法和政策,造成的情况虽然是结构性的,但如果是由父母或照顾者造成的,就会被视为疏忽大意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信