{"title":"Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2024.a932375","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2024.a932375","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Contributors <!-- /html_title --></li> </ul> <p>M<small>arco</small> C<small>aracciolo</small> is Associate Professor of English and Literary Theory at Ghent University in Belgium. His work explores the phenomenology of narrative, or the structure of the experiences afforded by literary fiction and other narrative media, particularly video games. He is the author of several books, including most recently <em>Contemporary Narrative and the Spectrum of Materiality</em> (2023).</p> <p>J<small>oe</small> H<small>ughes</small> is a Senior Lecturer in English and Theatre Studies at the University of Melbourne.</p> <p>J<small>ames</small> K<small>rasner</small> is Professor of English at the University of New Hampshire. His research interests include interdisciplinary aesthetics, domestic and architectural space, and Victorian Studies. He is currently working on a project on the politics of sleep.</p> <p>J<small>essica</small> M<small>arian</small> is a postdoctoral researcher in English and Theatre Studies at the University of Melbourne.</p> <p>R<small>uth</small> M<small>urphy</small> is a philosopher and linguist and currently holds a postdoctoral position at the University of Sheffield. She is also completing her PhD in Italian (University of Cambridge) on ethical concepts that arose in response to the Holocaust. Her work spans a range of writers—among them Primo Levi, Hannah Arendt, and James Baldwin—and combines literature and moral philosophy.</p> <p>E<small>lliot</small> P<small>atsoura</small> is a postdoctoral researcher in English and Theatre Studies at the University of Melbourne.</p> <p>S<small>imon</small> R<small>eader</small> is Associate Professor of English at the City University of New York. He is the author of <em>Notework: Victorian Literature and Nonlinear Style</em> (2021).</p> <p>W<small>illiam</small> R<small>evere</small> is Associate Professor of English at the University of North Carolina, Asheville. His research and writing focus on later medieval English literature and the reception of medieval literary and ethical traditions in early modernity and beyond. He is working on a book about conscience, virtues, social recognition, and moral \"hiddenness\" in ethical traditions from Chaucer and Langland in the late fourteenth century to the English reformations of sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.</p> <p>M<small>agda</small> S<small>zcześniak</small> is Assistant Professor of Cultural Studies at the Institute of Polish Culture, University of Warsaw. She is the author of two monographs devoted to the politics of representing class identities, structures, and conflicts in Polish culture. Her work has appeared in journals such as Journal of Visual Culture, Oxford Art Journal, and View. Theories and Practices of Visual Culture.</p> <p>L<small>aura</small> E. T<small>anner</small> is Professor of English at Bosto","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141721930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Medieval Futures and the Postwork Romance","authors":"William Revere","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2024.a932374","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2024.a932374","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This essay explores speculative resources in the premodern past as displayed in some contemporary anglophone fiction, with a focus on novels by Octavia Butler and Margaret Atwood. Among its retrievals, speculative medievalism offers a critical vantage point on ruinous, \"neofeudal\" futures by fashioning a form of romance narrative centered on workers. The late-fourteenth century English poem <i>Piers Plowman</i> is looked to as a premodern speculative precursor and interlocutor for such versions of the medieval past.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141717172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"\"Let me look again\": The Moral Philosophy and Literature Debate at 40","authors":"Ruth Murphy","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2024.a932369","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2024.a932369","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This article explores the relationship between ethics and literature, particularly as it has been conceived in academic debates since the early 1980s. It offers a reconciliation of the dichotomy between literature and moral philosophy through the concept of <i>bifocality</i>: writing that responds to the moral demands of a lived reality in both a philosophical and literary way. I suggest that bifocal writing is often found in works of testimony. Primo Levi's 1986 work <i>The Drowned and the Saved</i>, a collection of essays on the significance of the Holocaust, is then presented as an arch example.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141717170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Aesthetic Affairs: Art, Architecture, and the Illusion of Detachment","authors":"Laura E. Tanner, James Krasner","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2024.a932370","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2024.a932370","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>\"Aesthetic Affairs\" turns to three contemporary works of art—a short story, a graphic memoir, and a film—to consider how they invoke the conventions of human relationship and the paradigm of desire to highlight the inarticulable and seemingly inappropriate feelings solicited by art objects, architectural space, and design. Bringing together theories of architectural space, materiality, and desire with imaginative texts that both utilize and disrupt linguistic referentiality, this essay interrogates the illusion of detachment that governs an ocularcentric approach to art and the rational language that often accompanies it.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141717171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Metaphorical Figures for Moral Complexity","authors":"Marco Caracciolo","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2024.a932373","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2024.a932373","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>If literary narrative as a practice is well suited to capture morally complex situations, that is in large part due to the work of literary (that is, narrative and stylistic) <i>form</i>. This article examines the specific contribution that metaphorical language makes to the literary negotiation of moral complexity. The discussion is positioned vis-à-vis debates on the specific forms of moral knowledge that literature can provide, which I distinguish from both propositional meanings and the dilemmas entertained by analytic philosophers (for instance, the trolley problem). Instead, I draw on metaphor theory to suggest that metaphorical language can enrich the moral resonance of literature by deepening (and complicating) readers' engagement with fictional characters and the situations in which they are embedded. These metaphorical figures probe the experience captured by Cora Diamond under the rubric of the \"difficulty of reality.\" This idea is illustrated through a close reading of Lauren Groff's short story \"Flower Hunters,\" which skillfully orchestrates metaphorical language so as to encapsulate the protagonist's existential and moral impasse in times of ecological crisis.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141717421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Idols of the Fragment: Barthes and Critique","authors":"Simon Reader","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2024.a932368","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2024.a932368","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>Critics often valorize fragmentary writing as a device for subverting systems and liberating thought. Roland Barthes is an acknowledged aficionado of this style; this essay argues that he is equally one of its astute skeptics. While his early writings announce the need to dismantle bourgeois ideology in scattered strokes, his later works scrutinize the value of the piecemeal writing even as they ramify its aesthetic possibilities. Barthes's ambivalence replays an episode from the eighteenth century, when the Jena Romantics abruptly renounced the fragment on the grounds that its utopian promise easily devolved into parochial uses. Twenty-first century publishers continue to advertise fragmentary books as avant-garde provocations, but we should view this gesture as a conceit with a long history.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141717367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Measuring Mimesis","authors":"Eric Bulson","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2024.a922184","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2024.a922184","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This essay provides a computational close reading of Erich Auerbach’s <i>Mimesis</i>. In particular, it examines how measurements of its basic building blocks—the chapters, quotations, and pages—can inform our understanding of how Auerbach came to terms with the representation, and distribution, of three thousand years of literary history in a single literary-critical work. By taking the measurements of <i>Mimesis</i>, we are in a better position to assess not only how it functions as a work of literary criticism, but also how it challenges us to imagine the way literary works exist in and over time.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140105201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Drone Form and Techno-Futurities","authors":"Debjani Ganguly","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2024.a922183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2024.a922183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>What does it mean for humanity to inhabit a techno-planetary system in which it is not central? This essay will address a facet of this question by exploring the aesthetics of drone warfare. The drone features in my reading as a metonym for a techno-human continuum in which the human as an autonomous subject with interiority and capacity for ethical action appears as eminently dispensable. Aesthetic forms not only are informed by but also shape a mode of perception by means of which we apprehend the world. What happens to such apprehension when both the mode of perception and subjecthood defy human-centered assumptions about aesthetic form? How does one novelize the scalar complexity of distributed vision beyond the human? When decisions about life and death are ceded to a machinic vision, do questions of moral agency and responsibility recede into a posthuman realm or do they gain even more urgency? The essay pivots around questions such as these.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140115846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Philosophy, Literature, and the Avoidance of Reading","authors":"Nancy Yousef","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2024.a922182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2024.a922182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>“Philosophy of literature” is a thriving subfield of Anglo-American philosophy but virtually unknown within literary studies. This essay aims to address a significant methodological inadequacy that is characteristic of much work in “philosophy of literature”: the remarkable absence of sustained and close textual interpretation as a technique for argument and substantiation. Underlying this approach are assumptions about the separability of meaning from linguistic form that lie at the foundation of modern philosophical approaches to logic and language, instantiated here by Gottlob Frege’s 1918 essay “The Thought.” The implications of Fregean ideas are legible in the interpretive failings of “philosophy of literature.”</p></p>","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140115773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2024.a922190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2024.a922190","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Contributors <!-- /html_title --></li> </ul> <p>E<small>ric</small> B<small>ulson</small> is Andrew W. Mellon All-Claremont Chair in the Humanities in the Department of English at Claremont Graduate University. He is the author, most recently, of ‘<em>Ulysses’ by Numbers</em> (2020).</p> <p>D<small>ebjani</small> G<small>anguly</small> is Professor of English at the University of Virginia. She is the author of <em>Caste, Colonialism and Counter-Modernity</em> (2005) and <em>This Thing Called the World: The Contemporary Novel as Global Form</em> (2016), and editor of the two-volume <em>Cambridge History of World Literature</em> (2021). She is also the general editor, with Francesca Orsini, of the book series <em>Cambridge Studies in World Literature</em>.</p> <p>B<small>en</small> G<small>laser</small> is Associate Professor of English at Yale University. His work appears in <em>ELH</em>, <em>PMLA</em>, <em>Victorian Poetry</em>, <em>modernism/modernity</em>, and other venues. He is the author of <em>Modernism’s Metronome: Meter and Twentieth-Century Poetics</em> (2020), and coeditor with Jonathan Culler of <em>Critical Rhythm</em> (2019).</p> <p>R<small>achel</small> G<small>reenspan</small> is a psychoanalyst in private practice in New York. Her research explores global histories of psychoanalytic theory, practice, and pedagogy. Her recent work has appeared in <em>Parapraxis</em>, <em>The International Journal of Psychoanalysis</em>, and <em>differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies</em>.</p> <p>C<small>hristina</small> L<small>upton</small> is Professor of Literary and Cultural Studies at the University of Copenhagen, author of <em>Reading and the Making of Time in the Eighteenth Century</em> (2018) and <em>Love and the Novel</em> (2022) and coauthor of <em>Reading Novels During the Covid-19 Pandemic</em> (2023). Her current project is <em>Paid Leaves: Writing a Life Around 1968</em>.</p> <p>G<small>erard</small> P<small>assannante</small> is Professor of English and Comparative Literature at the University of Maryland, College Park. He is the author of <em>The Lucretian Renaissance: Philology and the Afterlife of Tradition</em> (2011) and <em>Catastrophizing: Materialism and the Making of Disaster</em> (2019).</p> <p>N<small>athan</small> T<small>e</small>B<small>okkel</small> is a literary scholar, beekeeper, and melon farmer. He recently finished his PhD at the University of British Columbia, where his research was generously supported by the Vanier and Killam doctoral scholarships.</p> <p>N<small>ancy</small> Y<small>ousef</small> is Professor of English at Rutgers University. She is the author of <em>Isolated Cases</em> (2004), <em>Romantic Intimacy</em> (2013), and <em>The Aesthetic Commonplace</em> (2022). She is currently at work on <em>Thinking in Words: Undisciplined Readings in Modern Philosophy</em>.</","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140115767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}