{"title":"Eertydse Nederduitse Gereformeerde teologiese denkstrome ten grondslag van Beyers Naudé se kritiek op apartheid","authors":"Murray Coetzee","doi":"10.5952/54-3-4-372","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-3-4-372","url":null,"abstract":"Former underlying Dutch Reformed theological currents that laid the foundations for Beyers Naude’s critique of apartheid South African neo-Calvinism, from which apartheid theology developed, was not the only theological current in the Dutch Reformed Church (DRC) since the establishment of the Church’s Theological Seminary at Stellenbosch (1858). The Utrecht theological current and Scottish Evangelical Pietism also remained dominant in the Seminary until the 1930s and it represented a critical-realistic hermeneutic different from South African neo-Calvinism. With a mission consciousness characterized by a respect for both spiritual and physically needs of people, Scottish Evangelical Pietism (which merged with the Utrecht current), was known for its premise that all people, despite their outward appearances, are equal. Despite pressure from the neo-Calvinists, this other current survived as a minority group (sometimes limited to a few individuals). Beyers Naude was part of a younger group of supporters of the Utrecht theological current and Scottish Evangelical Pietism in the DRC, gaining insights that enabled him to transcend a worldly narrow-mindedness and exclusionary thought patterns to include all people regardless of colour or ‘race’ in his social analysis. These insights were strengthened by his father and the DRC and the Afrikaner community in general’s role establishing moral values of reconciliation, compassion benevolence and justice in him. According to this study, Utrecht and Scottish Evangelical Pietism, as well as the above mentioned moral values, would together play a decisive role in shaping the life and work of Beyers Naude and would enable him to criticise apartheid later in life.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74408360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Rituals and social capital in the book of Leviticus? An attempt at an interdisciplinary discussion","authors":"Esias Meyer","doi":"10.5952/54-3-4-381","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-3-4-381","url":null,"abstract":"The article is an attempt by an Old Testament scholar to engage\u0000 with a debate taking place in practical theology. This debate is about the influence\u0000 of religion and ritual on the formation of social capital. The author attempts to\u0000 shed light on this debate by looking at the two halves of the book of Leviticus, the\u0000 first half of which is dominated by ritual and the second half is characterised by a\u0000 broader communal perspective.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75981390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Criminality, judgement and eschatology","authors":"T. D. Wit","doi":"10.5952/54-3-4-376","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-3-4-376","url":null,"abstract":"The so called emancipation of the victim of crime in the last\u0000 decades - socially, in criminal proceedings, and also our theoretical reflection\u0000 raises the question whether, morally speaking, our views on criminality have\u0000 changed. Is this perhaps indicative of a broader cultural shift in perspectives, a\u0000 reframing of the position of the victim and the perpetrator? The approach of the\u0000 Dutch victimologist Jan van Dijk seems to mirror a social and political trend\u0000 towards a post-Christian way of dealing with criminality. But his approach is\u0000 perhaps somewhat too contemporary, as I will argue, for he fails to take into\u0000 account the shadow sides of a culture which affords the victim such a central\u0000 place.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86093651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Theopoiesis and the aesthetics of human dignity: towards a pneumatological approach","authors":"D. Louw","doi":"10.5952/54-3-4-378","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-3-4-378","url":null,"abstract":"The discourse on human dignity is most of the times determined\u0000 by ethics and dogmatic issues. It is often the case that the paradigm of\u0000 democratisation dictates processes of conceptualisation. The article operates from\u0000 the hypothesis that aesthetics is more fundamental than ethics. Human dignity is a\u0000 relational category determined by habitus and the eschatological status of our being\u0000 qualities. In a pastoral theological approach one should shift from the democratic\u0000 paradigm to the pneumatological paradigm. In this regard the theology of A. A. Van\u0000 ruler becomes most appropriate. Theopoiesis points to a kind of theological\u0000 aesthetics within the realm of anthropology. The basic assumption of the article is\u0000 that more fundamental than the moral question whether man is good or bad is the\u0000 aesthetic question: the value and purpose of our being human; i.e. the human being\u0000 as beauty (the dignity of human beings) or human beings as beast (the ugliness of\u0000 human beings)? Human dignity is fundamentally an aesthetic category.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79798269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The social impact of religious communities : the case of the Huguenots in South Africa","authors":"J. Cilliers","doi":"10.5952/54-3-4-371","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-3-4-371","url":null,"abstract":"This paper takes a brief look at the history of the Huguenots\u0000 in South Africa as an example of the social impact of religious communities. Arnold\u0000 van Gennep and Victor turner’s theory of liminality is utilised to structure the\u0000 paper as a discussion of three phases of history, namely separation, liminality, and\u0000 aggregation. The paper concludes with some remarks concerning the relationship\u0000 between power and religion.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81301072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“Am I my brother’s keeper? An African reflection on humanisation","authors":"P. Naudé","doi":"10.5952/54-0-360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-0-360","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, a short typology of Dirk Smit’s theology is set out in terms of the words “contextual”, “reformed”, “ecumenical” and “public”. This is followed by a homily on the narrative of Cain and Abel as recorded in Gen. 4 in an attempt to illustrate the features of Smit’s theology. The Genesis narrative is analysed under the theme of (de)-humanisation in Africa. At first the strategies of de-humanisation are outlined, followed by the devastating consequences of these strategies. A trinitarian approach is then used to argue for the restoration of humanity on the African continent.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76526455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A homiletic credo - A firm belief in the preaching event","authors":"B. A. Muller","doi":"10.5952/54-0-359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-0-359","url":null,"abstract":"From 1981 to 2002 the author, together with Dirkie Smit and\u0000 Coenie Burger were responsible for the publication of 22 volumes of Sermon Helps,\u0000 which embodied a specific theological and homiletical approach to the preaching\u0000 event. The author finds it remarkable that after 30 years these homiletical premisses\u0000 are still adhered to in what he describes as his homiletical credo regarding the\u0000 preaching event (event here as translation of what leading German homileticians\u0000 describe as a “Wortgeschehen”. He concentrates on this event as an encounter between\u0000 listening to the living voice of God in the text and its modern context. This is in\u0000 essence a hermeneutical encounter, striving to incarnate the Living Word in the\u0000 language of the day, taking the text “into the night” of hard exegetical labour –\u0000 and all consuming prayer. Thereby the preaching event issues in joyous celebration\u0000 of the glory of God.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89461329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Confessional theology a belligerently public theology – How confessional theology relates to notions of Africanness and Reformedness","authors":"R. Tshaka","doi":"10.5952/54-0-362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-0-362","url":null,"abstract":"Confessional theology, while insisting on the centrality of the Word of God in theological reflection, admits that the socio-economic, cultural and political context in which such reflection takes place is vital. In paying homage to the theological contribution of Dirkie Smit in South Africa, this article argues that this is the most opportune time to consider how marginal issues of Africa still are in theological reflection today. Taking the baton from Smit, it is argued that confessional theology, if it is to remain relevant, must deal with issues of Africanness in theological reflections today.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90236839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Did Luther get it altogether wrong? Luther's interpretation of the function of the Mosaic law in Galatians","authors":"Francois J. L. Wessels","doi":"10.5952/54-0-367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-0-367","url":null,"abstract":"While a student at the University of Stellenbosch in the 1970s,\u0000 I struggled through Herman Ridderbos’ 600 page Paulus - Ontwerp van zijn\u0000 Theologie (Paul – Design of his Theology). Halfway through the book a\u0000 classmate, Dirkie Smit, came to my rescue by allowing me to have a look at some of\u0000 his handwritten notes. These notes – and his verbal explanation, delivered in one\u0000 late-night session – gave me the key to understand Ridderbos’ concerns. Suddenly I\u0000 understood why Ridderbos used his first chapter to explain (and debunk most of) the\u0000 different nineteenth- and twentieth-century schools of Pauline interpretation. I\u0000 understood why the second chapter was one on Grondstructuren (foundations) and why the third chapter – in which Ridderbos really started to deal\u0000 with the material from Paul’s epistles – was about “In leven in de zonde” (In living\u0000 in sin). Ridderbos’ book introduced me to Paul and prompted me to reflect on the\u0000 apostle in a way that eventually led me to do my postgraduate work in New Testament\u0000 studies. For this and for much more I am grateful to Dirkie and delighted\u0000 to offer these reflections on Paul as part of this volume in Dirkie’s honour. I have\u0000 always thought Ridderbos’ interpretation of Paul (and why he interpreted him in the\u0000 way he did) was the one which I understood reasonably well. This is not to say that\u0000 I, in later years, did not on occasion wonder whether and to what degree the\u0000 Ridderbos interpretation of Paul that I knew was the pure Paul of Ridderbos and not\u0000 the Smit reading of the Paul of Ridderbos. This did not lessen my appreciation of\u0000 Smit’s contribution to my thinking about these matters. It was his thoughts on the\u0000 process of reading and interpretation – for example in his 2006 work Neem,\u0000 lees! (Take, Read!) – that prompted me to reflect on Smit’s influence on my\u0000 reading of Ridderbos’ Paul. This brings me to the subject of this essay:\u0000 the influence of reading strategies on the interpretation of texts. In recent Pauline\u0000 studies the so-called Lutheran reading of Paul has been fiercely disputed. In my\u0000 opinion, it would be fair to say that, despite staunch defenders, the tide is\u0000 turning against the Lutheran reading. The question I turn to in this article is\u0000 whether this tendency is justified, in other words: Was Luther’s interpretation a\u0000 valid one?","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89392562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Should theology take evolutionary ethics seriously? A conversation with Hannah Arendt and Maxine Sheets-Johnstone","authors":"Wentzel van Huyssteen","doi":"10.5952/54-0-365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-0-365","url":null,"abstract":"In this essay I attempt to bridge the gap between evolutionary and theological meta-narratives by making a proposal for a bottom-up, contextual form of evolutionary ethics, and then specifically ask how this might apply to the evolution of morality, to ethical judgments, and the status of ethical judgments and moral codes in theology. Most importantly, this will imply a christian ethics, and a notion of morality that proceed not from a consideration of rules, duties, rights, moral judgments, moral status, but proceeds rather, from the examination of the fundamental evolutionary realities of human nature. This argument is developed against the background of an analysis of Maxine Sheets-Johnstone’s engagement with the work of Hannah Arendt on the notion of evil. Finally I argue that the work of evolutionary ethicists are of great importance for theologians because of their direct interest in how the evolutionary origins of human behaviour is to be explained, and in which way our behaviour has been constrained, but not determined, by biological factors. Evolution by natural selection can explain our tendency to think in normative terms, i.e., our innate sense of moral awareness. However, evolutionary explanations of this moral awareness cannot explain our moral judgments, nor justify the truth claims of any of our moral judgments. Why and how we make moral judgments can only be explained on the level of cultural evolution, and by taking into account the historical embeddedness of our moral codes in religious and political conventions. For Christian Theology the choice will not be between a moral vision that is inherent in revelation and is, therefore, ‘received’ and not invented or constructed. Instead, on a post-Foundational view our moral codes and ethical convictions of what is ‘received’ is itself an interpretative enterprise, shaped experientially through our embeddedness in communities and cultures.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77865782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}