Nanoethics最新文献_第8页

Towards Emancipatory Technology Studies 走向解放技术研究

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Nanoethics Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11569-021-00388-6

P. Frey, S. Schaupp, Klara-Aylin Wenten

引用次数: 4

Dialectics of Technical Emancipation—Considerations on a Reflexive, Sustainable Technology Development 技术解放的辩证法——关于反思性、可持续技术发展的思考

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Nanoethics Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11569-021-00387-7

Georg Jochum

引用次数: 1

The Three Pillars of Functional Autonomy of Hackers 黑客功能自治的三大支柱

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Nanoethics Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11569-021-00389-5

J. Söderberg, Maxigas

引用次数: 1

Towards a Digital Workerism: Workers’ Inquiry, Methods, and Technologies 迈向数字工人主义:工人的询问、方法和技术

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Nanoethics Pub Date : 2021-03-31 DOI: 10.1007/s11569-021-00384-w

Jamie Woodcock

引用次数: 10

Citizen Science Fiction: The Potential of Situated Speculative Prototyping for Public Engagement on Emerging Technologies 公民科幻小说：情境推测原型对新兴技术公众参与的潜力

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Nanoethics Pub Date : 2021-03-13 DOI: 10.1007/s11569-020-00382-4

J. Schuijer, J. Broerse, F. Kupper

引用次数: 3

Rethinking Assistive Technologies: Users, Environments, Digital Media, and App-Practices of Hearing 重新思考辅助技术:用户、环境、数字媒体和听力应用实践

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Nanoethics Pub Date : 2021-01-04 DOI: 10.1007/s11569-020-00381-5

Beate Ochsner, Markus Spöhrer, Robert Stock

{"title":"Rethinking Assistive Technologies: Users, Environments, Digital Media, and App-Practices of Hearing","authors":"Beate Ochsner, Markus Spöhrer, Robert Stock","doi":"10.1007/s11569-020-00381-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-020-00381-5","url":null,"abstract":"Against the backdrop of an aging world population increasingly affected by a diverse range of abilities and disabilities as well as the rise of ubiquitous computing and digital app cultures, this paper questions how mobile technologies mediate between heterogeneous environments and sensing beings. To approach the current technological manufacturing of the senses, two lines of thought are of importance: First, there is a need to critically reflect upon the concept of assistive technologies (AT) as artifacts providing tangible solutions for a specific disability. Second, the conventional distinction between user and environment requires a differentiated consideration. This contribution will first review James Gibson’s concept of “affordances” and modify this approach by introducing theories and methods of Science and Technology Studies (STS) and Actor-Network Theory (ANT). Then, we present two case studies where we explore the relations between recent “assistive” app technologies and human sensory perception. As hearing and seeing are key in this regard, we concentrate on two specific media technologies: ReSound LINX2, a hearing aid which allows for direct connect (via Bluetooth) with iPhone, iPad, or iPod Touch, and Camassia, an IOS app for sonic wayfinding for blind people. We emphasize the significance of dis-/abling practices for manufacturing novel forms of hearing and seeing and drawing on sources like promotional materials by manufacturers, ads, or user testimonials and reviews. Our analysis is interested in the reciprocal relationships between users and their socio-technical and media environments. By and large, this contribution will provide crucial insights into the contemporary entanglement of algorithm-driven technologies, daily practices, and sensing subjects: the production of techno-sensory arrangements.","PeriodicalId":18802,"journal":{"name":"Nanoethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138510022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

From Nano Backlash to Public Indifference: Some Reflections on French Public Dialogues on Nanotechnology. 从纳米反弹到公众冷漠:对法国纳米技术公共对话的一些思考。

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Nanoethics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-06 DOI: 10.1007/s11569-021-00396-6

Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent

{"title":"From Nano Backlash to Public Indifference: Some Reflections on French Public Dialogues on Nanotechnology.","authors":"Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent","doi":"10.1007/s11569-021-00396-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-021-00396-6","url":null,"abstract":"The hype surrounding the emergence of nanotechnology proved extremely effective to raise public attention and controversies in the early 2000s. A proactive attitude prevailed resulting in the integration of social scientists upstream at the research level, research programs on Ethical, Legal and Societal Impacts (ELSI), and various public engagement initiatives such as nanojury and citizen conferences. Twenty years later, what happened to the promises of SHS integration and public engagement in nanotechnology? Was it part of the hype, one of the many promises made by the champions of nanotechnology initiatives that never materialized? As a contribution to this broad question, this paper focuses on public engagement initiatives in France and ventures some general reflections on their fate. I will first report, from an insider's perspective, the public debates conducted by a civil society organization VivAgora, in the national context of fierce controversies (2005-2009). Then I will describe the permanent forum NanoRESP opened in 2013 when nano controversies waned out. On the basis of this case study, I will argue that the STS ideal of co-production of science and society gradually gave way to a more modest co-learning process between stakeholders in the 2010s.","PeriodicalId":18802,"journal":{"name":"Nanoethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419674/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39408734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Understanding Technology, Changing the World. 了解技术，改变世界。

IF 1.1 4区哲学

Nanoethics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-05 DOI: 10.1007/s11569-021-00410-x

Christopher Coenen

引用次数: 0

Life Cycle Assessment and Judgement 生命周期评估与判断

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Nanoethics Pub Date : 2020-11-26 DOI: 10.1007/s11569-020-00376-2

C. Nathan, S. Coles

引用次数: 1

Current Debates About the Ethics of New Technology 当前关于新技术伦理的争论

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Nanoethics Pub Date : 2020-11-26 DOI: 10.1007/s11569-020-00379-z

C. Nathan

引用次数: 0