Nanoethics最新文献_第3页

Digital Sequence Information and the Access and Benefit-Sharing Obligation of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 数字序列信息与《生物多样性公约》的获取和惠益分享义务。

IF 1.3 4区哲学

Nanoethics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11569-023-00436-3

Frank Irikefe Akpoviri, Syarul Nataqain Baharum, Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol

{"title":"Digital Sequence Information and the Access and Benefit-Sharing Obligation of the Convention on Biological Diversity.","authors":"Frank Irikefe Akpoviri, Syarul Nataqain Baharum, Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol","doi":"10.1007/s11569-023-00436-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-023-00436-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the advent of synthetic biology, scientists are increasingly relying on digital sequence information, instead of physical genetic resources. This article examines the potential impact of this shift on the access and benefit-sharing (ABS) regime of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Nagoya Protocol. These treaties require benefit-sharing with the owners of genetic resources. However, whether \"genetic resources\" include digital sequence information is unsettled. The CBD conceives genetic resources as genetic material containing functional units of heredity. \"Material\" implies tangibility, and for some scholars, \"functional units of heredity,\" undefined in both treaties, mean full-coding sequences. This article argues that digital sequence information obtained from physical genetic resources, full-coding or not, should be treated as genetic resources. Literal construction of the CBD risks eroding its usefulness and the ABS regime. This is because through bioinformatics, sequence information can easily be obtained from genetic resources for utilization, without physically moving them or concluding ABS agreement with owners. The CBD must evolve with scientific progress also because sequence functionality depends on the state of knowledge. These arguments are vindicated by domestic ABS laws equating genetic information with genetic resources; Nagoya Protocol provisions deeming research exploiting the genetic composition of genetic resources as utilization of genetic resources; and CBD provisions requiring the sharing of benefits from the utilization of genetic resources. Moreover, treaty interpretation and case law demand that generic, scientific terms, such as \"genetic resources\" and \"functional units of heredity\" be interpreted in an evolutionary manner to capture scientific developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":18802,"journal":{"name":"Nanoethics","volume":"17 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043851/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9241822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}