{"title":"Started as Crew (a): Jan Fields and Mcdonald's","authors":"P. Werhane, Jenny Mead, J. Sheehan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1417178","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1417178","url":null,"abstract":"McDonald’s Corporation, the behemoth of the fast food industry, has taken its share of criticism--even ridicule--over the years. The image of the company suffered as the public began to perceive its jobs as dead-end, unskilled, and unstimulating. The term \"McJob,\" coined by an author in 1991, was slang for a low-paying job that required little skill and provided little opportunity for advancement. But in many ways, McDonald’s Corporation defied norms, using a combination of promotion-from-within strategy and benchmark employee training programs to develop an abundant pool of human capital. The company was deeply committed to its employees who \"started as crew\" coming up through the ranks, receiving the necessary training at its own Hamburger University. This case tells the story of Jan Fields, who started at McDonald’s making french fries and found herself 20 years later serving as executive vice president and chief operations officer at McDonald’s USA.","PeriodicalId":185314,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Ethics (Topic)","volume":"27 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131858727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Moral Theory and Frameworks","authors":"A. Wicks, B. Parmar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1417202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1417202","url":null,"abstract":"This technical note outlines background theories of ethics that are relevant to managerial decision-making and develops a framework that managers can use to enhance their ability to make good choices.","PeriodicalId":185314,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Ethics (Topic)","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122413254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Note on Sexual Harassment","authors":"R. Freeman, A. Wicks, Jenny Mead","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.908132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.908132","url":null,"abstract":"This note discusses sexual harassment, its definition (including the two main definitions: quid pro quo and hostile environment), legal issues, and background. Included in the note are statistics compiled by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on incidents of sexual harassment and key Supreme Court rulings on the issue, including Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson (1986), Faragher v. City of Boca Raton (1998), and Burlington Industries v. Ellerth (1998).","PeriodicalId":185314,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Ethics (Topic)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121350470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Genetic Testing and the Puzzles We are Left to Solve (B)","authors":"R. Freeman, Stacy Pierce","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.908456","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.908456","url":null,"abstract":"This set of cases (labeled A through M [UVA-E-0192 through UVA-E-0203]) presents various vignettes, each with a specific dilemma about genetic testing and the ethical issues and difficult decisions that this testing presents to patients, doctors, employers and employees. UVA-E-0204 is a technical note about genetic testing which provides background and information on the issues.","PeriodicalId":185314,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Ethics (Topic)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125575769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Quick-Cook Ovens: A Public Relations Perspective","authors":"W. T. Stewart, D. Paustenbach, L. Paine","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1277017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1277017","url":null,"abstract":"The product manager is informed by the quality control manager of radiation leakage in the microwave ovens shipped in the last several months that could possibly pose a health hazard to the consumer. If a recall is instituted, a severe loss of consumer confidence could result in a sharp decline in market share. Meanwhile, the cause of the defect has been uncovered, and current units being shipped fall within federal limits. The product manager decides to talk confidentially to an acquaintance in the firm's public relations department before deciding what to do. The case raises issues of \"the right thing to do\" on the part of both the product manager and the public relations department.","PeriodicalId":185314,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Ethics (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128750789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Make Mine a Russian Short-Hair, and Hold the Allergies Please","authors":"R. Freeman, W. Truslow, Pia Ahmad, Bidham Pamar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.908736","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.908736","url":null,"abstract":"Written after the successful cloning of a cat, this case discusses the market for pet cloning, specifically, allergen-free cats. The case looks at pet cloning from the perspectives of (1) an animal-rights activist, (2) a pet lover, and (3) an individual allergic to cats. It also explores the business potential of this area.","PeriodicalId":185314,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Ethics (Topic)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127199308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Exxonmobil and the Chad–Cameroon Pipeline (a)","authors":"A. Wicks, P. Werhane, Jenny Mead","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1278357","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1278357","url":null,"abstract":"This case presents the dilemma of a multinational oil and gas company, ExxonMobil, as it factors in the ethics issues related to the environment and cultural differences in deciding whether to proceed with building a pipeline in Chad and Cameroon, two of the poorest and most corrupt developing countries in West Africa. The many players in this project included the World Bank, which cofinanced the project and put restrictions into place that would hopefully prevent government corruption in both Chad and Cameroon and many environmental and human rights groups that warned of potential disaster. The case also covers the environmental and social analysis of the areas that would be affected by the pipeline.","PeriodicalId":185314,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Ethics (Topic)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125180678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Note on Obedience to Authority","authors":"R. Freeman, A. Wicks","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1277022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1277022","url":null,"abstract":"This note describes and discusses two experiments. In Milgram's Obedience Experiment, subjects acted as \"teachers\" posing questions to \"learners.\" Inaccurate answers resulted in an electric shock being administered to the learner. When the errors increased in number, the voltage of the shocks was increased to a point of intolerable pain. Although the shocks were not real (learners faked their responses), the teachers believed them to be real. The experiment revealed the willingness of the teachers to punish the learners in obedience to directions from the person in authority over them. In the Zimbardo Prison Experiment, college students acted as either \"prisoners\" or \"prison guards\" in a mock prison setting. Guards had the freedom to run the prison as they saw fit, without direct supervision. Open hostility toward prisoners and rebellion by prisoners soon prevailed. What should have been a two-week experiment was aborted on the fifth day when it became evident that real suffering was being inflicted on the prisoners.","PeriodicalId":185314,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Ethics (Topic)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123554868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ethics and Mba Recruiting - Some Vignettes","authors":"R. Freeman, P. Werhane","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1277723","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1277723","url":null,"abstract":"This note consists of vignettes that highlight a number of ethical issues for MBA students as they begin the process of finding a job. They serve as a practical springboard for a discussion of a wide array of topics, inlcuding sexual harassment and obligation to classmates.","PeriodicalId":185314,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Ethics (Topic)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128933163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"First Impressions Inc. (C)","authors":"P. Werhane, Gerry Yemen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1277717","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1277717","url":null,"abstract":"Judy Wiles, president and owner of First Impressions, Inc., needs new ideas to market her temporary-food-service employment agency to lucrative private accounts in suburban Detroit. In the A case, Wiles, a member of a minority group, encounters overtly racist behavior, which spurs her to implement changes to her marketing plan. The B case (UVA-E-0176) supplies a new twist: Wiles decides to hire a white front man to represent the \"public face\" of her company. The A and B cases present an exciting forum to discuss the conflict between \"values and profits,\" and the C case (UVA-E-0177) provides the dramatic epilogue.","PeriodicalId":185314,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Ethics (Topic)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130552984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}