Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences最新文献

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Conversion Therapy: Or, Who Put The ‘GI’ in ‘SOGI’? 性取向和性别认同转换疗法：或者，谁在 "SOGI "中加入了 "GI"？

Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2024.02.01.0001

Holly Lawford-Smith

引用次数: 0

Beyond parochial bias: Commentary on Winegard et al. (2023). 超越狭隘偏见：对 Winegard 等人（2023 年）的评论。

Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI: 10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000011

Joachim Krueger

引用次数: 0

The Dangers of Bad History as a Source of Liberal Bias: Comment on Winegard et al., 2023 错误历史作为自由主义偏见来源的危险：对 Winegard 等人的评论，2023 年

Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI: 10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000010

Christopher Ferguson

引用次数: 0

The Value Gap: A School Psychologist’s Perspective on Rausch et al.(2023) 价值差距：一位学校心理学家对劳施等人（2023）的看法

Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000009

Jeffery Braden

{"title":"The Value Gap: A School Psychologist’s Perspective on Rausch et al.(2023)","authors":"Jeffery Braden","doi":"10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000009","url":null,"abstract":"Rausch et al. describe an empirical effort to test a number of hypotheses put forward by Lukianoff and Haidt (2018) regarding the values of contemporary (Gen Z) vs. previous generations of undergraduates. My review of their work focuses primarily on the methodologies Rausch et al. employ in executing their research. Strengths of their study include: the empirical replication and extension of prior claims; a priori specification of hypotheses and the methodology to test them; and the insight that prior claims may confound gender and generational status. Weaknesses include: the use of an untested (and unknown) scale to measure their dependent variable; the unfortunate and erroneous classification of majors into “hard” science vs. social science categories; a confound between graduate student status and generational status; and the number and interdependence of the statistical tests they use to test their hypotheses. All of the methodological weaknesses I identify (with the exception of their measurement of academic values) could be strengthened through changes to their procedures and analyses. Overall, their insight that Lukianoff and Haidt’s attribution of value differences to generational status may be confounded with gender is worthy of further research.","PeriodicalId":180485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139365535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Review of ‘It’s Not What Was Said But Who Said It To Whom: Interactant Sex Affects Attributions of Sexism in Ambiguous Situations’ 回顾“不是说了什么，而是谁对谁说的:在模棱两可的情况下，互动性影响性别歧视的归因”

Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI: 10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000005

P. Connor

引用次数: 0

The Value Gap: How Gender, Generation, Personality, and Politics Shape the Values of American University Students 价值差距:性别、代际、个性和政治如何塑造美国大学生的价值观

Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI: 10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000001

Zachary Rausch, Glenn Geher, Clare Redden

{"title":"The Value Gap: How Gender, Generation, Personality, and Politics Shape the Values of American University Students","authors":"Zachary Rausch, Glenn Geher, Clare Redden","doi":"10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000001","url":null,"abstract":"Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, in their book, The Coddling of the American Mind (2018), portrayed current undergraduate American college students (most of whom are in the generation Gen Z: 1995 - 2013) as valuing emotional well-being and the advancement of social justice goals above traditional academic values such as academic freedom and the pursuit of truth. We investigated whether this value discrepancy exists among 574 American university students by exploring the prioritization of five different academic values (academic freedom, advancing knowledge, academic rigor, social justice, and emotional well-being). We also explored how gender, generation, personality, major, and conservatism predict each academic value. Generational differences were present, with Gen Z students emphasizing emotional well-being and de-emphasising academic rigor. Males scored higher on measures of academic freedom and advancing knowledge, while lower on social justice and emotional well-being compared to females. Political conservatism was the strongest predictor for social justice scores, with increased liberal attitudes predicting higher scores on social justice. Emotional stability positively predicted advancing knowledge, while negatively predicting emotional well-being. Agreeableness positively predicted emotional well-being, while negatively predicting advancing knowledge. We ultimately argue that gender is a crucial, underestimated explanatory factor of the value orientations of American college students.","PeriodicalId":180485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129256646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Base Rates Can Be Both Socially Useful and Socially Undesirable: Review of Grawitch et al 2022 基本利率既可能对社会有益，也可能对社会不利:回顾Grawitch等人2022

Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI: 10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000004

Cory J. Clark

引用次数: 0

It’s Not What Was Said but Who Said It to Whom: Interactant Sex Affects Attributions of Sexism in Ambiguous Situations 不是说了什么，而是谁对谁说的:在暧昧的情况下，互动性影响性别歧视的归因

Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI: 10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000003

Matthew J. Grawitch, Kristi N. Lavigne, Srikanth Mudigonda

引用次数: 0

The challenging task of demonstrating motivated tribalism: Review of Bernstein et al 2023 展示动机部落主义的挑战性任务:伯恩斯坦等人2023年的评论

Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI: 10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000006

P. Ditto

引用次数: 0

Comment on "Tribalism in American Politics: Are Partisans Guilty of Double Standards?" 评论《美国政治中的部落主义:党派犯了双重标准吗?》

Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI: 10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000007

R. Redding

{"title":"Comment on \"Tribalism in American Politics: Are Partisans Guilty of Double Standards?\"","authors":"R. Redding","doi":"10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000007","url":null,"abstract":"This brief paper comments on the Bernstein et al. studies on \"Tribalism in American Politics.\" Although the studies have some significant limitations, they provide a tantalizing window into the possibility that the state of affairs with respect to partisan bias may not be as sanguine as a recent meta-analysis suggests - that liberals and conservatives are equally biased against the other. On the contrary, until relatively recently, when researchers are now starting to challenge the received wisdom on the subject, the social and political psychology project has painted a relatively negative psychological portrait of conservatives and a positive one of liberals. By now, these portraits are well familiar to most psychologists and even much of the general public. Conservatives are more authoritarian, less intelligent, and more closed minded, among other things. Liberals are more enlightened, more flexible, and more open minded. But is this narrative correct? Could it be that liberals are more biased and less open-minded than conservatives, as the Bernstein et al. findings suggest, at least under some (perhaps even many) circumstances? The answer to this question, with its likely complexities, awaits further research.","PeriodicalId":180485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132781207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0