Comment on "Tribalism in American Politics: Are Partisans Guilty of Double Standards?"

R. Redding
{"title":"Comment on \"Tribalism in American Politics: Are Partisans Guilty of Double Standards?\"","authors":"R. Redding","doi":"10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This brief paper comments on the Bernstein et al. studies on \"Tribalism in American Politics.\" Although the studies have some significant limitations, they provide a tantalizing window into the possibility that the state of affairs with respect to partisan bias may not be as sanguine as a recent meta-analysis suggests - that liberals and conservatives are equally biased against the other. On the contrary, until relatively recently, when researchers are now starting to challenge the received wisdom on the subject, the social and political psychology project has painted a relatively negative psychological portrait of conservatives and a positive one of liberals. By now, these portraits are well familiar to most psychologists and even much of the general public. Conservatives are more authoritarian, less intelligent, and more closed minded, among other things. Liberals are more enlightened, more flexible, and more open minded. But is this narrative correct? Could it be that liberals are more biased and less open-minded than conservatives, as the Bernstein et al. findings suggest, at least under some (perhaps even many) circumstances? The answer to this question, with its likely complexities, awaits further research.","PeriodicalId":180485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Inquiry in the Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58408/issn.2992-9253.2023.01.01.00000007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This brief paper comments on the Bernstein et al. studies on "Tribalism in American Politics." Although the studies have some significant limitations, they provide a tantalizing window into the possibility that the state of affairs with respect to partisan bias may not be as sanguine as a recent meta-analysis suggests - that liberals and conservatives are equally biased against the other. On the contrary, until relatively recently, when researchers are now starting to challenge the received wisdom on the subject, the social and political psychology project has painted a relatively negative psychological portrait of conservatives and a positive one of liberals. By now, these portraits are well familiar to most psychologists and even much of the general public. Conservatives are more authoritarian, less intelligent, and more closed minded, among other things. Liberals are more enlightened, more flexible, and more open minded. But is this narrative correct? Could it be that liberals are more biased and less open-minded than conservatives, as the Bernstein et al. findings suggest, at least under some (perhaps even many) circumstances? The answer to this question, with its likely complexities, awaits further research.
评论《美国政治中的部落主义:党派犯了双重标准吗?》
本文简要评述了伯恩斯坦等人对“美国政治中的部落主义”的研究。尽管这些研究有一些明显的局限性,但它们提供了一个诱人的窗口,让我们了解党派偏见的情况可能不像最近的一项荟萃分析所显示的那样乐观——自由派和保守派对对方的偏见是平等的。相反,直到最近,当研究人员开始挑战在这个问题上的公认智慧时,社会和政治心理学项目已经描绘了一个相对消极的保守派和一个积极的自由派的心理肖像。到目前为止,这些肖像对大多数心理学家甚至大部分公众来说都很熟悉。保守主义者更专制,更不聪明,思想更封闭,等等。自由主义者更开明,更灵活,思想更开放。但这种说法正确吗?就像伯恩斯坦等人的研究结果所表明的那样,自由派是否比保守派更有偏见,更不开放,至少在某些(甚至很多)情况下是这样?这个问题的答案及其可能的复杂性,有待进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信