Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society最新文献_第2页

Third Meeting 第三次会议

Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0068673500010476

引用次数: 0

Plato's Treatment of Callicles in the ‘Gorgias’ 柏拉图在《高尔吉亚篇》中对卡利克勒斯的论述

Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0068673500001462

G. Kerferd

{"title":"Plato's Treatment of Callicles in the ‘Gorgias’","authors":"G. Kerferd","doi":"10.1017/S0068673500001462","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500001462","url":null,"abstract":"Three main views have been put forward as attempts to answer the question what were the political affiliations of Callicles in Plato's Gorgias. According to one view Callicles is seen as the very archetype of the tyrant and the oligarch, a man prepared to indulge in himself an unbridled lust for power, the absolute antithesis of the democrat and all that democracy stands for, giving expression to a doctrine, in the words of Grote, ‘not simply anti-popular – not simply despotic – but the drunken extravagance of despotism’. This view was associated with repeated attempts to identify Callicles with one or other of the known oligarchs in the fifth century – Critias being the favourite. Such attempts are now generally abandoned. But the overall view of Callicles' doctrine probably remains the orthodox one, at least in the English-speaking world, and the comparison with Nietzsche and Carlyle has become commonplace. According to a second view, however, the opposite is the case – Callicles was not aristocratic, oligarchic or tyrannical in his views, rather he was a democrat, indeed even ‘the typical Athenian democrat’. Finally it is possible to distinguish a third view, according to which initially Callicles is presented as a champion of absolutism but is shown as undergoing ‘a strange transformation’ in the course of the dialogue to a position more in accord with ‘the growing love of equality’.","PeriodicalId":177773,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114150167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Tityos and the Lover 提提俄斯和情人

Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0068673500003291

E. Kenney

引用次数: 1

Booking the return trip: Ovid and Tristia 1 预订返程:奥维德和崔斯提亚1

Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0068673500004739

Stephen Hinds

{"title":"Booking the return trip: Ovid and Tristia 1","authors":"Stephen Hinds","doi":"10.1017/S0068673500004739","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500004739","url":null,"abstract":"Two journeys are implied by the existence of Tristia 1: one, by a poet, a from Rome to the gates of the Black Sea; the other, by a book, from the gates of the Black Sea back to Rome. Each of these journeys is explicitly, and prominently, discussed in Tristia 1; and each makes its presence felt in various ways throughout Tristia 1. Leaving for another day the outward voyage, described especially in the second, fourth, tenth and eleventh poems, I am going to deal in this essay with the return trip of Ovid's book to Rome, as anticipated at some length in the very opening poem of the collection. And (because that is still a somewhat unwieldy topic) I am going to focus on the final destination of Tristia 1 within Rome, as specified in the last twenty lines or so of this first poem: viz: the bookcase in Ovid's Roman home. In these programmatically charged lines, the personified first book of exile poetry finds itself face to face with the poetry books written by Ovid before his exile. I want in the ensuing pages to take a closer look than is usually taken at some details of this and other encounters with Ovid's past writings in the first poems from exile; and my hope is that this analysis will tell us a few things along the way about how the poet is trying here to relate his literary present to his literary past.","PeriodicalId":177773,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122127661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 123

Second Meeting 第二次会议

Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0068673500006246

引用次数: 0

A note on the structure of the pieces numbered 1–25 in Propertius Book 2 《财产论》第二册编号为1-25的作品结构注释

Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0068673500001528

W. Camps

引用次数: 0

CCJ volume 43 Cover and Front matter CCJ第43卷封面和封面问题

Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0068673500006039

引用次数: 0

Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Roman chronology 哈利卡那索斯的狄奥尼修斯与罗马年表

Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0068673500001991

C. Schultze

引用次数: 3

Remarks on the Black Cloaks of the Ephebes 论以弗比人的黑袍

Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0068673500003369

P. Maxwell-Stuart

引用次数: 3

'EΠIΣΠENΔEIN NEKPWI, 'Agamemnon' 1393-81

Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/S1750270500030220

D. W. Lucas

{"title":"'EΠIΣΠENΔEIN NEKPWI, 'Agamemnon' 1393-81","authors":"D. W. Lucas","doi":"10.1017/S1750270500030220","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1750270500030220","url":null,"abstract":"'ETTIOTTEVSEIV VEKpco would be expected to mean' to pour a libation (sponde) on a corpse'. This is a thing no Greek is recorded ever to have done—not in itself a reason why Clytemnestra should not have done it or wished to do it, if a motive could be suggested. But in the light of what is known about Greek ritual such a motive is not easily discoverable. The core of the problem is in lines 1395-6. The most widely accepted translation has been to this effect: 'and had it been a fitting act to pour a libation on a corpse, this had been justly done, aye more than justly'. It was so taken by Weir Smyth and Mazon, and as lately as 1955 by Ammendola. However, uneasiness was early feit about the absence of the article before -TTPETTOVTCOV, and Voss's irpETrövTcos, commended in Stanley's influential edition, has been preferred by many editors including Wilamowitz (text and trans. 1885), Fraenkel, and Denniston-Page, f[v is now equivalent to Ê fjv 'if it were possible fittingly to pour a libation on a corpse'. With similar effect Van Heusde, followed by Walter Headlam, kept TTpETrövTcov but took it as a part. gen. depending on ETTIOTTEVSEIV 'if it were possible to pour on a corpse a libation of fitting things'. On this viewTTPETTOVTCOV can be explained by TOCTWVSE. . .KOKCÖV 1397. The two last interpretations can be considered together. Since the hypothetical form of the sentence shows that the libation is not to be poured, the question arises, what was the difficulty about pouring fitting libations, or pouring them fittingly? Three answers seem to exhaust the possibilities. (1) The answer offered by Schütz which, so far as it goes, is logical: Clytemnestra needed rerum convenientium copia. Without the proper materials she could not offer proper libations. But Clytemnestra's palace, we have been given to understand, was nothing if not well supplied, and the materials for any normal libation must have been available; anyway the point would be trivial. (2) The sense might be that Clytemnestra could not properly offer libations to the man she had herseif killed. This was the view of Schneidewin (1883), who read","PeriodicalId":177773,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124682928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0