Journal of Social Issues最新文献

{"title":"Can Deep Canvassing Promote Anti-Carceral Attitudes? A Field Experiment","authors":"Kristen Brock-Petroshius,&nbsp;Martin Gilens","doi":"10.1111/josi.70012","DOIUrl":"10.1111/josi.70012","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Passing and implementing policies that will advance racial equity requires adequate levels of public support. Yet, interventions designed to inform citizens and cultivate such support are rarely successful, especially on highly salient, racialized issues like incarceration and policing. This challenge is further amplified when explicitly discussing racism, which often triggers adverse reactions or backlash. We conducted a pre-registered, randomized, placebo-controlled field experiment making use of deep canvassing conversations—an intensive intervention that has proven effective in shifting views on other highly salient issues. Half of our treatment conversations explicitly discussed anti-Black racism in the criminal legal system, while the other half took a race-absent approach. Outcomes were assessed across three follow-up surveys. We found that both deep canvassing conditions increased support for jail decarceration and other anti-carceral policies. These effects were evident 1 week after the intervention but were limited in their durability after exposure to a counter message and after 6 months post-treatment. Given the general lack of effective persuasion methods in real-world contexts that can endure for even a week, deep canvassing continues to prove a promising method. In contrast to prior research commonly demonstrating null or backlash results from discussing racism, these findings suggest that there are ways to discuss racism that can effectively build support for racial equity policies and change related attitudes. Deep canvassing is not a panacea. Understanding the tradeoffs and limitations of both race-explicit and race-absent approaches helps to inform the strategic choices of organizers, advocates, and scholars.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144244602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Breaking the Silence: White Privilege Intervention in the Netherlands","authors":"Nivedita Singhal,&nbsp;Ceren Su Abacioglu,&nbsp;Catherine Molho,&nbsp;Berke Tan Tabak","doi":"10.1111/josi.70011","DOIUrl":"10.1111/josi.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the Netherlands, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) efforts typically avoid using the term “race”, instead adopting a broader “diversity inclusion” framework that shifts focus from racial inequalities to cultural differences. Our project aimed to introduce, test, and apply a framework to reduce color-evasive racial attitudes while fostering empathy among White participants toward racialized individuals. We tested a video intervention designed to reduce color-evasive attitudes and explored whether a self-compassion-based writing exercise could enhance ethnocultural empathy—encompassing awareness, beliefs, and actions toward racialized individuals. Specifically, we examined whether this intervention reduced White fear (anxiety about interacting with racialized individuals) and increased guilt and affective empathy when learning about racism. In an online, within-between-subjects experiment, 301 White Dutch participants completed a writing task. In the experimental condition (<i>n</i> = 151), participants reflected on a marginalized identity and practiced self-compassion; in the control condition (<i>n</i> = 150), they wrote on a neutral topic. All participants then watched a video of racialized individuals discussing the harms of color-evasive attitudes. A paired-sample <i>t</i>-test showed the video intervention reduced color-evasive racial attitudes in all participants. However, general linear model analyses found no direct or indirect effect of the writing intervention on ethnocultural empathy. These findings informed a White privilege awareness and allyship workshop (see Supporting Information).</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josi.70011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144214090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Identity Safety in Cancer Screening: Building a Basic Research-to-Clinic Translation of Social Identity Theory","authors":"Katarina E. AuBuchon,&nbsp;Melody Emenyonu,&nbsp;Nikhitha Muthenini,&nbsp;Kristi D. Graves,&nbsp;Hannah Arem","doi":"10.1111/josi.70008","DOIUrl":"10.1111/josi.70008","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Environmental cues can signal identity threat (e.g., potential discrimination) or identity safety (e.g., belonging) to socially marginalized people. However, scant research has examined safety and threat cues in healthcare. In our T1-T2 concurrent triangulation mixed-methods study, participants (age 35–60; ∼25% each cisgender Black women, Black men, Latina, Latino) completed quantitative (<i>n</i> = 288) and qualitative (<i>n</i> = 80) surveys. Participants rated their past healthcare experiences and future cancer screening intentions, analyzed via multiple regression. Participants responded to short-answer questions about their healthcare experiences to identify cues to identity threat and/or identity safety, analyzed via grounded theory. Identity safety related to prostate, breast, and colorectal cancer screening intentions, controlling for mistrust and past discrimination. Qualitative results concurred, indicating that interpersonal cues and environmental features cue safety or threat. Our findings support that Black and Latine people value identity safety in cancer screening, and future interventions could test promoting safety cues to promote cancer screening.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144135668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Translating Social Psychology for Addressing Implicit Bias in Health Care","authors":"Jeff Stone,&nbsp;Katie Wolsiefer","doi":"10.1111/josi.70010","DOIUrl":"10.1111/josi.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Reseach indicates that healthcare providers' interpersonal biases toward marginalized patients are linked to poorer clinical judgments, strained interactions, and worse health outcomes. These biases often lead patients to disengage from care, including avoiding future visits to the same providers or clinics, and possibly seek fewer effective alternatives for treating disease. In this paper, we use the clinical and translational science (CTS) framework to review the translational work we have done on implicit bias in health care in three domains: Documenting the implicit nature of the biases that different health care providers hold toward various marginalized patient groups, examining the associations between provider bias and interactions with marginalized patients and their outcomes, and developing and testing the effectiveness of workshops that teach providers about bias and bias reduction strategies they can use when they interact with marginalized patients.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144135701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An Intervention to Increase Belonging and Support Retention for Faculty of Color and Women Faculty","authors":"Robyn K. Mallett,&nbsp;Zahra Naqi-Hasnain,&nbsp;Dana Garbarski,&nbsp;Christine Li-Grining,&nbsp;David C. Ensminger,&nbsp;Walter Tangarife,&nbsp;Badia Ahad","doi":"10.1111/josi.70009","DOIUrl":"10.1111/josi.70009","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Faculty of Color and women faculty face significant obstacles (e.g., isolation, marginalization, tokenism) on the road to tenure and promotion. We translate social psychological research on the contact hypothesis and belonging and adapt previous interventions at other universities to deliver an institutional-level intervention designed to support faculty belonging and retention. This study utilizes a faculty climate survey and institutional-level demographic data to assess tenure-track faculty belonging and retention following the intervention. We observe greater perceptions of institutional support for diversity and lesser disparities in belonging and tenure rates among historically marginalized faculty over three years following the intervention. We discuss how social psychologists may help translate basic research into institutional interventions that promote racial justice and equity. Our work illustrates the potential for targeted initiatives to reduce disparities and promote equity and representation in academia, ultimately benefiting both faculty and students.</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josi.70009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144135669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Impact of Science Denial and Pseudoscience on the Behavioral and Social Sciences","authors":"Naomi Oreskes","doi":"10.1111/josi.70007","DOIUrl":"10.1111/josi.70007","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This special volume presents a set of papers on science denial and pseudoscience. I identify three key contributions. One is that social and behavioral scientists are able to able to analyze motivations and states of mind that contribute to the rejection of mainstream science and acceptance of pseudo-science and false claims. Two, the papers in this volume take a number of informal gleanings and suggestions, and subject them to rigorous and much-needed analysis. Three, the papers clarify that while some people who reject science may suffer pathologies, such as the desire for chaos or the expression of spite, most do not. Targeted interventions that accurately identify the target group are more likely to succeed than “one size fits all” approaches. That said, there is the potential tension between understanding science denial as a manifestation of pain and suffering versus understanding it as a problem of information deficit. The good news is that evidence suggests that most science deniers are not suffering pathologies, and that many people do benefit from good information, presented in engaging ways. Collectively these papers demonstrate that science rejection is a matter of both ignorance and willful rejection, and that both can be addressed, albeit most likely in different ways.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143865611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction to “Lower SES PhD students experience interpersonal disconnection from others both inside and outside of academia”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/josi.12628","DOIUrl":"10.1111/josi.12628","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Citation to article being corrected: Park, H.J., Ruberton, P.M., Smyth, J.M., Cohen, G.L., Purdie-Greenaway, V., &amp; Cook, J.E. (2023). Lower SES PhD students experience interpersonal disconnection from others both inside and outside of academia. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Social Issues&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;79&lt;/i&gt;(1), 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12556&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Description of error:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In line 15 of the “Participants and procedure” section (p. 84), the number of participants who completed the baseline survey should be changed to 1081 instead of 1085. This error does not influence our final sample size and thus does not influence our results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In line 3 of the “A sense of social integration into academia” section (p. 94), the coefficient representing the non-significant effect of international status on social integration should be changed to -.01 instead of .01. This error does not change the implication of our results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In lines 2–3 of the “Perceived similarity to others in department” section (p. 95), “In addition, international students perceived less similarity to others compared to domestic students” should be changed to “In addition, international students perceived more similarity to others compared to domestic students”. All statistics do not need to be changed. Relatedly, in the discussion section (lines 41–44 of p. 99), “In addition, in line with past literature on international students’ experience (Glass et al., 2015), international students (compared to domestic students and controlling for SES and gender) perceived less similarity with their colleagues inside academia.” should be changed to “Contrary to past literature on international students’ experience (Glass et al., 2015), international students (compared to domestic students and controlling for URM status, SES and gender) perceived more similarity with their colleagues inside academia.”.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In lines 6–8 of the “Perceived similarity to others in department” section (p. 95), “Students’ perceived similarity to other people in their department decreased over the year, β&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; = −.31, &lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;(3588) = −2.04, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = .04, 95% CI [−.60, −.01], &lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = .0004, but this trajectory did not differ as a function of demographic variables.” should be changed to “Students’ perceived similarity to other people in their department decreased over the year, β&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; = −.31, &lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;(3588) = −2.04, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = .04, 95% CI [−.60, −.01], &lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = .0004, but this trajectory did not differ as a function of demographic variables except for international status, γ&lt;sub&gt;12&lt;/sub&gt; = −.25, &lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;(3588) = −2.68, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = .01, 95% CI [−.43, −.07], &lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = .001. For international students, perceived similarity did not change across the year (β&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; = .20, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = .30) while it did decline across the year for domestic non−URM (β&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; = −.40, &lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;(3588) = −2.67, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = .008, 95% CI [−.70, −.11], &lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = .0004) and","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josi.12628","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143717344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Institutionalized Misinformation in US Education: Combatting the Overselling of Learning Styles and Underselling of Spaced Effort","authors":"Anne M. Cleary,&nbsp;Daniel H. Robinson","doi":"10.1111/josi.70005","DOIUrl":"10.1111/josi.70005","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Similar to medicine and climate science, education suffers from the spread of misinformation in the United States. Learning styles are an approach that, despite being shown to be <i>ineffective</i> at benefiting learning, is oversold in education, continuing to be extensively implemented, institutionalized, and widely believed to benefit learning. At the same time, over a century of rigorous experimental evidence indicates the effectiveness of spaced learning efforts for enhancing memory retention, skill acquisition, and coming to new understandings in the learning process, yet spacing is undersold in US education. We suggest that research on misinformation spread, pseudoscience, and science denial in domains like vaccines and climate change is relevant to misinformation spread regarding learning styles. We further suggest that the misinformation literature could inform the development of methods for decreasing the spread of misinformation concerning learning styles while increasing the spread of accurate information about spacing's benefits. These efforts could help to accelerate the rate at which the integration of new developments across disciplines can pave the way for a better integration of rigorous experimental science and policy and practice in US education.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143707576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction to “My mother did not have civil rights under the law”: Family derived race categories in negotiating positions on Critical Race Theory","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/josi.12623","DOIUrl":"10.1111/josi.12623","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sambaraju, R. (2024). “My mother did not have civil rights under the law”: Family derived race categories in negotiating positions on Critical Race Theory. <i>Journal of Social Issues</i>, 80, 218–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12607</p><p>In the initial publication of this article, the extracts were missing. They have now been added to the article online. The page numbers in the PDF reflect the updated article length following issue publication, not the article's page numbers in the initial issue publication.</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josi.12623","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141194815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction to Focusing the critical race psychology lens: CRT and the psychological study of social issues","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/josi.12631","DOIUrl":"10.1111/josi.12631","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Salter, P. S., Moadel-Attie, R., Miller, A. L., Brenick, A., &amp; Bonam, C. M. (2024). Focusing the critical race psychology lens: CRT and the psychological study of social issues. <i>Journal of Social Issues</i>, 80, 7−17. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12609</p><p>Any opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author and do not reflect the views of the US Census Bureau.</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josi.12631","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141938872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}