{"title":"DSM-5-TR Clinical Cases.","authors":"David A Kahn","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000833","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Akanksha Dadlani, Jeffrey A Mills, Jeffrey R Strawn
{"title":"Licensure Actions Against Psychiatric Clinicians: A Cohort Analysis of National Practitioner Database Reports.","authors":"Akanksha Dadlani, Jeffrey A Mills, Jeffrey R Strawn","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000831","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000831","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine trends and predictors of administrative actions against psychiatric clinicians' licenses between 2002 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) identified 6400 disciplinary actions against psychiatric clinicians' licenses. Linear trend models assessed the trends of disciplinary actions across mental/physical health, licensing/legal issues, and unprofessional conduct. A first-order autoregressive model with a time indicator interaction term evaluated structural breaks (ie, a sudden or gradual change in the characteristics of data in a time series). Predictors of claims were assessed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Since 2002, disciplinary actions related to clinicians' mental/physical health (P=0.004) and licensure/legal issues (P=0.018) have decreased, while actions related to unprofessional conduct remained unchanged (P=0.358). Declines emerged in 2012 for mental/physical health (break coefficient -0.367; P=0.026) and in 2009 for unprofessional conduct (break coefficient -0.199; P=0.013). Clinicians facing disciplinary actions related to physical/mental health were significantly younger than those with legal/licensure issues (P<0.001). While the average age remained stable for mental/physical health-related actions, the average age increased for actions related to licensure/legal claims and unprofessional conduct.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The decrease in disciplinary actions related to physical/mental health may reflect better access and acceptance of treatment of clinicians, while the reduction in licensure/legal actions may indicate policy shifts. Findings regarding age underscore the need for enhanced support for mid and late-career clinicians to promote lifelong learning and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"35-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745757/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Languages We Speak.","authors":"John M Oldham","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000829","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000829","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Because of γ-Aminobutyric Acid-Glutamate Imbalance, Gut Microbiota, or Both? Delirious Mania Induced by Ciprofloxacin Use: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.","authors":"Ayşe Sakalli Kani, Ayşe Süleyman","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000836","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000836","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ciprofloxacin is an antibiotic from the fluoroquinolone group that is frequently used in many clinical practices. In addition to its peripheral neuropathic side effects, it is an antibiotic that can pass through the blood-brain barrier due to its lipophilic features and cause rare central nervous system symptoms. Although cases of neuropsychiatric symptoms developing after treatment with ciprofloxacin have been reported in the literature, the number of reports of manic episodes after ciprofloxacin use is limited, and there have been no reports of delirious mania developing after ciprofloxacin use until the case presented in this report. Here we report the case of a 52-year-old woman who developed manic symptoms after receiving ciprofloxacin, which evolved into delirious mania. Clinical factors that may predispose to neurotoxicity are discussed and compared with features of the mania cases in the literature. The underlying neurobiological mechanisms are also reviewed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"46-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How Quickly Multiple Medication Use Can Start: A Medication for Every Complaint on the First Visit Compromising the Ability to Determine Cause and Effect.","authors":"Sheldon H Preskorn, Amy Terry","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000835","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000835","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article presents a case demonstrating that multiple medication use can begin on the first outpatient visit if the prescriber makes multiple psychiatric diagnoses and then feels the need to treat each diagnosis with a different central nervous system active medication labeled for each indication. This approach poses potential problems. First, a single drug or perhaps 2 drugs, in this case, may have been sufficient as initial and perhaps final treatment. Second, the prescriber cannot tell which drug(s) is/are producing either a beneficial or an adverse effect. This approach may stem from prescribers thinking that if they have made a diagnosis then they need to treat it with a drug labeled for or clinically used to treat that indication rather than taking a more conservative approach. However, such an approach adversely affects the ability to determine cause-and-effect relationships and hence adversely affects the ability to determine the best way to revise the treatment going forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"24-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Matthew S Phillips, Nataliya Turchmanovych-Hienkel, Mira I Leese, Brian Ramanauskas, Hannah B VanLandingham, Christopher Gonzalez, Gabriel P Ovsiew, Anthony D Robinson, Brian M Cerny, Devin M Ulrich, Jason R Soble
{"title":"The Relationship Between Subjective Cognitive Complaints, Invalid Symptom Reporting, and Neurocognitive Test Performance Validity Among Adults Being Evaluated for ADHD.","authors":"Matthew S Phillips, Nataliya Turchmanovych-Hienkel, Mira I Leese, Brian Ramanauskas, Hannah B VanLandingham, Christopher Gonzalez, Gabriel P Ovsiew, Anthony D Robinson, Brian M Cerny, Devin M Ulrich, Jason R Soble","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000834","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000834","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Subjective cognitive complaints are common among patients presenting for evaluation of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Despite these complaints, research overwhelmingly suggests that reported cognitive deficits do not align with objective neurocognitive performance. This study explored the relationship between subjective cognitive complaints, objective neuropsychological functioning, and performance and symptom validity testing in adult patients referred for evaluation due to concern about ADHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 523 adult referrals who underwent comprehensive evaluation for concern about ADHD and to characterize cognitive strengths and weaknesses. Four hundred patients were diagnosed with ADHD, and 123 did not meet the diagnostic criteria for ADHD. Patients were dichotomized to form nonelevated (n=134) and elevated (n=389) cognitive complaint groups, which were compared on objective neurocognitive performance, report of ADHD-specific symptoms, and performance validity tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were identified between the elevated and nonelevated cognitive complaints groups in performance validity tests and ADHD symptom reporting; however, clinical differences were not identified on objective neurocognitive measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with the results of previously published research, subjective cognitive complaints did not align with objective neurocognitive deficits in a sample of adult ADHD referrals. Elevated cognitive complaints were associated with higher rates of performance validity failure and invalid ADHD-specific symptom reporting. These findings highlight the importance of assessing cognitive complaints using symptom report inventories and cognitive tests that include objective validity indices.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lana Sidani, Sarah M Nadar, Jana Tfaili, Serena El Rayes, Fatima Sharara, Joe C Elhage, Marc Fakhoury
{"title":"Digital Psychiatry: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.","authors":"Lana Sidani, Sarah M Nadar, Jana Tfaili, Serena El Rayes, Fatima Sharara, Joe C Elhage, Marc Fakhoury","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000819","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, the field of psychiatry has experienced a transformative shift with the integration of digital tools into traditional therapeutic approaches. Digital psychiatry encompasses a wide spectrum of applications, ranging from digital phenotyping, smartphone applications, wearable devices, virtual/augmented reality, and artificial intelligence (AI). This convergence of digital innovations has the potential to revolutionize mental health care, enhancing both accessibility and patient outcomes. However, despite significant progress in the field of digital psychiatry, its implementation presents a plethora of challenges and ethical considerations. Critical problems that require careful investigation are raised by issues such as data privacy, the digital divide, legal frameworks, and the dependability of digital instruments. Furthermore, there are potential risks and several hazards associated with the integration of digital tools into psychiatric practice. A better understanding of the growing field of digital psychiatry is needed to promote the development of effective interventions and improve the accuracy of diagnosis. The overarching goal of this review paper is to provide an overview of some of the current opportunities in digital psychiatry, highlighting both its potential benefits and inherent challenges. This review paper also aims at providing guidelines for future research and for the proper integration of digital psychiatry into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"30 6","pages":"400-410"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142801339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Adam Howard, Gregg Robbins-Welty, Nicole J Schindler, Brian Kincaid, Jonathan Komisar
{"title":"Misdiagnosis of Primary Eating Disorder in an Individual With Major Depressive Disorder and Comorbid Catatonic Syndrome.","authors":"Adam Howard, Gregg Robbins-Welty, Nicole J Schindler, Brian Kincaid, Jonathan Komisar","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000825","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000825","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Catatonia is a neuropsychiatric syndrome affecting movement, emotion, speech, and behavior, which commonly occurs secondary to medical or psychiatric disorders and with comorbid illnesses. We report the case of an 18-year-old male with a history of depression, anxiety, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, polysubstance use, and previous suicide attempts who presented to the hospital from a residential eating disorders treatment facility, due to psychomotor slowing. The patient scored 3 or lower on the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), but he showed marked improvement following 2 mg of intravenous lorazepam. The patient was referred for ECT, experienced dramatic improvement, and was discharged at his baseline functioning. His discharge diagnosis was catatonic syndrome secondary to severe melancholic depression. Catatonia may present a diagnostic challenge as no single catatonia screener captures all possible phenotypes. The patient consistently scored low on the BFCRS but he had a clear response to standard-of-care catatonia treatment. Psychomotor slowing is common in catatonia but is not designated as a catatonic feature in either the DSM-5 or the BFCRS. This case also presented diagnostic complexity as the patient initially presented with malnutrition and concern about a possible eating disorder. This report highlights that diagnosing catatonia is challenging, particularly in the context of medical complexity, and that there are discrepancies between diagnostic tools. When suspicion of catatonia is high, despite low individual screening scores, clinicians may consider alternative screening instruments or empiric treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"30 6","pages":"447-448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142801427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How a Dream Led Me to Psychoanalysis.","authors":"Eric M Plakun","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000818","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000818","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This column addresses the role of dreams in psychoanalysis and psychodynamic therapy. It includes an autobiographical perspective on how a dream led this psychiatrist to become a psychoanalyst and an introduction to social dreaming.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"30 6","pages":"431-433"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142801391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Clinical Utility of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale: A Treatment Perspective.","authors":"Joost Hutsebaut, Donna S Bender","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000822","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000822","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS) was introduced in DSM-5 to articulate a conceptual foundation for all types of personality psychopathology, and to provide an assessment of the severity of impairment. Constructed using universal human capacities related to self- and interpersonal functioning, the LPFS defines a continuum of 5 levels ranging from optimal functioning to extreme impairments in functioning. While there have been a growing number of empirical studies demonstrating its reliability and validity, the LPFS was designed fundamentally as an informative clinical tool, potentially useful to practitioners working in a variety of roles using diverse interventions. This article addresses the issue of treatment utility from 2 particular perspectives. First, we illustrate how the capacities targeted by the LPFS offer a framework for treatment, applicable to a variety of theoretical or methodological orientations. We illustrate that the different facets of the LPFS may provide general aims for treatment by identifying the pathways through which change is realized in (whatever) psychotherapy. Second, we suggest how the levels of functioning may inform pathways toward change by providing information useful for treatment assignment and planning, such as the therapist's stance, the types of intervention, and specific goals in treatment. Through discussing these issues while using brief clinical vignettes, we hope that this article may stimulate clinicians to use the LPFS and discover its value in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"30 6","pages":"411-420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142801444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}