Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Adolescents With Non-suicidal Self-injury: A Randomized Controlled Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Yingqi Yin, Shufang Zhang, Lan Yu, Fan Shi, Guilin Yu
{"title":"Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Adolescents With Non-suicidal Self-injury: A Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Yingqi Yin, Shufang Zhang, Lan Yu, Fan Shi, Guilin Yu","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a significant clinical concern in adolescents. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of group interpersonal psychotherapy (G-IPT) combined with treatment as usual (TAU) compared with TAU alone in treating adolescents with NSSI. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a psychiatric outpatient clinic in Hubei Province, China, involving 52 adolescents 12 to 17 years of age diagnosed with NSSI. Participants were randomly assigned to either the G-IPT combined with TAU group (n=26), who received 12 additional G-IPT sessions, or the TAU-alone group (n=26). Outcomes were assessed using the Ottawa Self-Injury Inventory (OSI), 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Interpersonal Disturbances Scale (IDS), and Interpersonal Communication Scale (ICS) at pre-treatment [Time Zero (T0)], immediately after completion of G-IPT, or 12 weeks after baseline assessment in the TAU group [Time 1 (T1)], and 3 months after treatment [Time 2 (T2)]. Forty-eight participants completed all assessments. The primary outcomes included a reduction in NSSI frequency and an increase in participants' ability to resist NSSI. Results demonstrated reductions in the OSI item \"NSSI in the last month\" at T1 (P<0.001) and T2 (P=0.008), as well as significant improvements in the OSI item \"Strength to resist NSSI\" (P<0.001 at T1; P=0.001 at T2). Significant between-group and interaction effects were observed, indicating that G-IPT combined with TAU was more effective than TAU alone in reducing NSSI behaviors. These findings underscore the potential of G-IPT as an effective adjunct to TAU in clinical settings for adolescent NSSI intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"31 2","pages":"65-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000846","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a significant clinical concern in adolescents. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of group interpersonal psychotherapy (G-IPT) combined with treatment as usual (TAU) compared with TAU alone in treating adolescents with NSSI. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a psychiatric outpatient clinic in Hubei Province, China, involving 52 adolescents 12 to 17 years of age diagnosed with NSSI. Participants were randomly assigned to either the G-IPT combined with TAU group (n=26), who received 12 additional G-IPT sessions, or the TAU-alone group (n=26). Outcomes were assessed using the Ottawa Self-Injury Inventory (OSI), 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Interpersonal Disturbances Scale (IDS), and Interpersonal Communication Scale (ICS) at pre-treatment [Time Zero (T0)], immediately after completion of G-IPT, or 12 weeks after baseline assessment in the TAU group [Time 1 (T1)], and 3 months after treatment [Time 2 (T2)]. Forty-eight participants completed all assessments. The primary outcomes included a reduction in NSSI frequency and an increase in participants' ability to resist NSSI. Results demonstrated reductions in the OSI item "NSSI in the last month" at T1 (P<0.001) and T2 (P=0.008), as well as significant improvements in the OSI item "Strength to resist NSSI" (P<0.001 at T1; P=0.001 at T2). Significant between-group and interaction effects were observed, indicating that G-IPT combined with TAU was more effective than TAU alone in reducing NSSI behaviors. These findings underscore the potential of G-IPT as an effective adjunct to TAU in clinical settings for adolescent NSSI intervention.

群体人际心理治疗对青少年非自杀性自伤的影响:一项随机对照研究。
非自杀性自伤(NSSI)是青少年临床关注的一个重要问题。本研究的目的是评价团体人际心理治疗(G-IPT)联合常规治疗(TAU)与单独TAU治疗青少年自伤的疗效。在中国湖北省的一家精神科门诊进行了一项随机对照试验,涉及52名12 - 17岁被诊断为自伤的青少年。参与者被随机分配到G-IPT联合TAU组(n=26),他们接受了12个额外的G-IPT疗程,或单独TAU组(n=26)。采用渥太华自我伤害量表(OSI)、9项患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑障碍-7 (GAD-7)、人际障碍量表(IDS)和人际沟通量表(ICS)在治疗前[时间零(T0)]、G-IPT完成后立即、TAU组基线评估后12周[时间1 (T1)]和治疗后3个月[时间2 (T2)]进行结果评估。48名参与者完成了所有评估。主要结果包括自伤频率的降低和参与者抵抗自伤的能力的增强。结果显示,在T1时,OSI项目“上个月自伤”减少(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychiatric Practice® seizes the day with its emphasis on the three Rs — readability, reliability, and relevance. Featuring an eye-catching style, the journal combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with practical and informative tips for treating patients. Mental health professionals will want access to this review journal — for sharpening their clinical skills, discovering the best in treatment, and navigating this rapidly changing field. Journal of Psychiatric Practice combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with informative "how to" tips for surviving in a managed care environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信