心理动力疗法的评价研究:基础与最新进展。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Fabian Guénolé
{"title":"心理动力疗法的评价研究:基础与最新进展。","authors":"Fabian Guénolé","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychodynamic therapy (PDT), a technical adaptation of psychoanalysis, is one of the most widely practiced forms of psychotherapy, making evaluative research on it essential. Although research on PDT has been ongoing for several decades, theoretical and practical challenges initially hindered the adoption of evidence-based medicine standards in such research, a shift that has largely taken place over the past 20 years. This article reviews the evolution of evaluative research on PDT for mental disorders in adults, with a focus on those with complex conditions. Since the first prospective evaluative studies in the 1950s, an accumulating body of knowledge-including cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses-has established PDT as an evidence-based treatment for common mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms and related disorders, and personality disorders, as well as complex mental disorders involving combinations of these conditions. There is also evidence supporting PDT's usefulness in treating anorexia nervosa and opioid dependence, along with some findings suggesting its potential use for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, bulimia nervosa, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Recent studies indicate that PDT can serve as a personalized treatment, promoting deep and lasting psychopathological changes in patients with severe, complex, and chronic mental disorders, involving specific technical features and mechanisms of change. These findings support the inclusion of PDT in mental health care policies and training, while ongoing research continues to explore its optimal treatment parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluative Research on Psychodynamic Therapy: Foundations and Recent Advances.\",\"authors\":\"Fabian Guénolé\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Psychodynamic therapy (PDT), a technical adaptation of psychoanalysis, is one of the most widely practiced forms of psychotherapy, making evaluative research on it essential. Although research on PDT has been ongoing for several decades, theoretical and practical challenges initially hindered the adoption of evidence-based medicine standards in such research, a shift that has largely taken place over the past 20 years. This article reviews the evolution of evaluative research on PDT for mental disorders in adults, with a focus on those with complex conditions. Since the first prospective evaluative studies in the 1950s, an accumulating body of knowledge-including cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses-has established PDT as an evidence-based treatment for common mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms and related disorders, and personality disorders, as well as complex mental disorders involving combinations of these conditions. There is also evidence supporting PDT's usefulness in treating anorexia nervosa and opioid dependence, along with some findings suggesting its potential use for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, bulimia nervosa, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Recent studies indicate that PDT can serve as a personalized treatment, promoting deep and lasting psychopathological changes in patients with severe, complex, and chronic mental disorders, involving specific technical features and mechanisms of change. These findings support the inclusion of PDT in mental health care policies and training, while ongoing research continues to explore its optimal treatment parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychiatric Practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"27-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychiatric Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000826\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000826","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理动力疗法(PDT)是精神分析的技术改编,是最广泛应用的心理治疗形式之一,因此对其进行评估性研究至关重要。尽管PDT的研究已经进行了几十年,但理论和实践方面的挑战最初阻碍了在此类研究中采用循证医学标准,这一转变主要发生在过去20年。本文综述了成人精神障碍的PDT评估研究的进展,重点是那些具有复杂条件的人。自20世纪50年代首次前瞻性评估研究以来,包括队列研究、随机对照试验和荟萃分析在内的知识积累体系已将PDT确立为一种基于证据的治疗常见精神障碍的方法,如抑郁症、焦虑症、躯体症状及相关疾病、人格障碍,以及涉及这些疾病组合的复杂精神障碍。也有证据支持PDT在治疗神经性厌食症和阿片类药物依赖方面的有效性,同时一些研究结果表明它可能用于治疗精神分裂症谱系障碍、神经性贪食症和创伤后应激障碍。最近的研究表明,PDT可以作为一种个性化的治疗方法,促进严重、复杂和慢性精神障碍患者的深度和持久的精神病理改变,涉及特定的技术特征和改变机制。这些发现支持将PDT纳入精神卫生保健政策和培训,同时正在进行的研究继续探索其最佳治疗参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluative Research on Psychodynamic Therapy: Foundations and Recent Advances.

Psychodynamic therapy (PDT), a technical adaptation of psychoanalysis, is one of the most widely practiced forms of psychotherapy, making evaluative research on it essential. Although research on PDT has been ongoing for several decades, theoretical and practical challenges initially hindered the adoption of evidence-based medicine standards in such research, a shift that has largely taken place over the past 20 years. This article reviews the evolution of evaluative research on PDT for mental disorders in adults, with a focus on those with complex conditions. Since the first prospective evaluative studies in the 1950s, an accumulating body of knowledge-including cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses-has established PDT as an evidence-based treatment for common mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms and related disorders, and personality disorders, as well as complex mental disorders involving combinations of these conditions. There is also evidence supporting PDT's usefulness in treating anorexia nervosa and opioid dependence, along with some findings suggesting its potential use for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, bulimia nervosa, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Recent studies indicate that PDT can serve as a personalized treatment, promoting deep and lasting psychopathological changes in patients with severe, complex, and chronic mental disorders, involving specific technical features and mechanisms of change. These findings support the inclusion of PDT in mental health care policies and training, while ongoing research continues to explore its optimal treatment parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychiatric Practice® seizes the day with its emphasis on the three Rs — readability, reliability, and relevance. Featuring an eye-catching style, the journal combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with practical and informative tips for treating patients. Mental health professionals will want access to this review journal — for sharpening their clinical skills, discovering the best in treatment, and navigating this rapidly changing field. Journal of Psychiatric Practice combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with informative "how to" tips for surviving in a managed care environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信