Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry最新文献

{"title":"Reverse impression technique: A fully digital protocol for the fabrication of the definitive fixed prosthesis for completely edentulous patients.","authors":"Giolanta M Liaropoulou, Phophi Kamposiora, Jorge Bertos Quílez, Oriol Cantó-Navés, Pindaros G Foskolos","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.02.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.02.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In complete arch implant rehabilitation, one of the greatest difficulties still encountered in the digital workflow is the deviation of the implant position during intraoral scanner (IOS) data acquisition. As a result, the passivity of a definitive prosthesis fabricated using IOS data might be compromised. Thus, an implant position verification method is essential, either digitally or conventionally executed. A fully digital protocol for the fabrication of the definitive fixed prosthesis for completely edentulous patients, without the interference of any conventional step within the digital process, is presented. For the verification of the captured position of the scan-bodies, novel scan analogs were connected to the interim prosthesis extraorally and scanned. The virtual superimposition of the interim prosthesis intraorally with the same prosthesis extraorally served as a verification device for the position of the implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1118-1122"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9171867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Mechanical performance of 3-dimensionally printed resins compared with conventional and milled resins for the manufacture of occlusal devices: A systematic review.","authors":"Vitor de Paula Lopez, Juliana Dias Corpa Tardelli, André Luis Botelho, José Augusto Marcondes Agnelli, Andréa Cândido Dos Reis","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.12.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.12.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Digital methods for manufacturing occlusal devices provide advantages over conventional techniques, but information about the mechanical properties of 3-dimensionally (3D) printed resins is scarce.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature to determine whether 3D-printed resins for occlusal devices present satisfactory mechanical performance when compared with milled and conventional heat polymerized and autopolymerized resins.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This systematic review followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol and was registered in the Open Science Framework. The search strategy was applied without restriction of time and language to Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases, and to the nonpeer-reviewed literature in ProQuest and Google Scholar. The selection process was conducted independently in 2 stages by 2 reviewers according to the eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was analyzed by using a checklist of important parameters to be considered. The systematic review considered the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, studies (PICOS) format, where population was resins for 3D printing of occlusal devices, intervention was inherent characteristics of the resin, comparison was conventional heat polymerized, autopolymerized, and milled resins, outcome was mechanical performance, and studies were in vitro experimental studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1430 articles were found with the search strategy. After removing 182 duplicates found in Rayyan, the title and abstract of 1248 articles were evaluated, of which 37 articles were screened from the databases, 23 were selected for full reading, and 6 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review; 1 had a low risk of bias and 5 had a moderate risk. An additional search of the reference list of included articles did not result in the inclusion of any articles. A quantitative meta-analysis could not be performed because of the heterogeneity of the included studies regarding the type of resin used and the method for evaluating mechanical performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resins for 3D printing had satisfactory mechanical performance for interocclusal devices when compared with conventional heat polymerized and autopolymerized resins, except for hardness. Milled resins were better than 3D-printed resins in hardness, wear resistance, flexural strength, flexural modulus, and fracture resistance when printing angle and thickness were not considered. Further development is needed in terms of printing techniques and chemical composition, as they are important for optimal mechanical properties and clinical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1262-1269"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10521025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Letter to the Editor regarding, \"The application of 3D printing in dentistry: A bibliometric analysis from 2012 to 2023 (J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Jul 1)\".","authors":"Jie Tian, Yang Gao, Ming-Jia Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.039","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.039","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1345-1346"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142108594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effect of thiourethane on the polymerization and mechanical properties of composite resin: A systematic review.","authors":"Vitória Massoneto Piccolli, Rafael Leonardo Xediek Consani","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Thiourethane has high chemical affinity with polymeric materials and its addition has been suggested for improving adhesives and composite resin. However, a systematic review of thiourethane addition is lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the articles in the dental literature that studied the effect of thiourethane added to the resin matrix of dental materials related to polymerization shrinkage and mechanical properties.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The systematic review was prepared in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and was registered in the Open Science Framework (osf.io/sb9my). The population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design (PICOS) were the following: composite resin, thiourethane addition, composite resin without addition, evaluation of polymerization and mechanical properties, and in vitro experimental studies. Initially, 204 articles were found, 150 of which were excluded because of duplication. After reading the titles and abstracts based on the application of eligibility criteria, 21 articles were selected for reading in full, and all were included in the systematic review. Three reviewers evaluated the articles independently in 2 phases based on the eligibility criteria (selection of the title and reading of the article in full), with the reviewers' doubts and discrepancies being analyzed and resolved in a meeting with the authors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the articles reported a significant improvement in the polymerization shrinkage and mechanical properties of experimental polymeric materials with the addition of oligomers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thiourethane added to resin dental materials improved their polymerization shrinkage values and mechanical properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1261.e1-1261.e7"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Clinician preferences for single-unit implant restoration designs and materials: A survey of the membership of the Pacific Coast Society for Prosthodontics.","authors":"Todd R Schoenbaum, Panos Papaspyridakos, Young K Kim, Celin Arce, Kent Knoernschild","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.02.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.02.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Clinical research has difficulty keeping pace with the rapid evolution of materials, protocols, and designs of single-unit implant restorations. The clinical design preferences of prosthodontics for different clinical scenarios are lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this cross-sectional survey was to determine the current prevalence of usage of various treatment options and materials for single-unit implant-supported restorations.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>From August to September of 2022, a survey invitation was sent to members of the Pacific Coast Society for Prosthodontics (PCSP). The survey was hosted online and asked 37 questions related to the materials, protocols, and design preferences for single-unit implant-supported restorations in various clinical scenarios. The prompts included the suggestion that answers should be based on preferences for the \"ideal\" treatment of a hypothetical patient seeking implant treatment for the replacement of a single missing tooth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 133 questionnaires sent via email, 35 were returned. The results are presented with histograms that use color coding as an experience proxy metric. A total of 87% of respondents was in private practice, and 60% reported having restored more than 1000 single-unit implant restorations. For the replacement of a single maxillary central incisor under ideal conditions and angulation through the palatal surface, respondents preferred bone level implants (93%) and screw-retained restorations (80%), with 50% of those being zirconia with a titanium abutment and 21% being cast metal-ceramic. For an identical scenario, except that the angulation would be through the facial surface, respondents preferred the angled screw system (55%) and cemented (41%) restorations. For the replacement of a single missing mandibular molar under ideal conditions, respondents preferred bone level implants (79%) and screw-retained restorations (79%), with 70% of those being zirconia with a titanium abutment and 17% being cast metal-ceramic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While a wide range of protocols, designs, and materials exist for the replacement of a single missing tooth, these results provide a snapshot of current single-unit implant prosthodontic preferences in the Western United States and Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1288-1298"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9508293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Response to Letter to the Editor regarding, \"The application of 3D printing in dentistry: A bibliometric analysis from 2012 to 2023 (J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Jul 1)\".","authors":"Guangwei Chen, Jingkun Zhang, Jianfeng He, Yongqi Li, Chengwei Li, Zhiyan Lin, Huilin Wu, Libin Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.041","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.041","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1347-1349"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142145884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Development of 3-dimensionally printed denture base material utilizing hybrid polymer: A preliminary investigation.","authors":"Nur A'fifah Husna Zahari, Durratul Aqwa Mohd Farid, Muhammad Syafiq Alauddin, Zulfahmi Said, Mohd Ifwat Mohd Ghazali, Hao-Ern Lee, Syazwani Mohamad Zol","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Current 3-dimensionally (3D) printed denture bases have inadequate strength and durability for long-term use, and milled denture bases generate excessive waste. Addressing these limitations is crucial to advancing prosthetic dentistry, ensuring improved patient outcomes and promoting environmental responsibility.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in vitro study was to incorporate microparticles into a commercially available 3D printed denture base resin and compare its mechanical and biological properties with the conventional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base material.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Microparticles were collected from milled zirconia blanks and were blended with a 3D printing denture base resin (NextDent Denture 3D+). The optimal zirconia microparticle content (2%) for blending and printed was determined by using a liquid-crystal display (LCD) 3D printer. The printed specimens were then postrinsed and postpolymerized based on the manufacturer's instructions. Mechanical and biological characterization were carried out in terms of flexural strength, fracture toughness, and fungal adhesion. One-way ANOVA was carried out to analyze the results statistically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incorporation of microparticles in the 3D printed denture demonstrated higher mechanical strength (104.77 ±7.60 MPa) compared with conventional heat-polymerized denture base resin (75.15 ±24.41 MPa) (P<.001), but the mechanical strength deteriorated when compared with the unmodified 3D printing resin (122.17 ±11.58 MPa) (P<.001). However, the modified 3D printed denture showed greater antibacterial activity (1184.00 ±243.25 CFU/mL) than the unmodified resin (1486.50 ±103.94 CFU/mL) (P=.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incorporation of microparticles into the 3D printed denture base resin demonstrated the potential to enhance the mechanical and biological properties of the denture base when compared with conventional techniques. However, when compared with the unmodified 3D printed denture base resin, the mechanical properties deteriorated while the biological properties improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1329.e1-1329.e6"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141988204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Deep learning-based automated detection of the dental crown finish line: An accuracy study.","authors":"Jinhyeok Choi, Junseong Ahn, Ji-Man Park","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.018","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>The marginal fit of dental prostheses is a clinically significant issue, and dental computer-aided design software programs use automated methods to expedite the extraction of finish lines. The accuracy of these automated methods should be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of a new hybrid method with existing software programs that extract finish lines using fully automated and semiautomated methods.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 182 jaw scans containing at least 1 natural tooth abutment were collected and divided into 2 groups depending on how the digital data were created. Group DS used desktop scanners to scan casts trimmed for improved finish line visibility, while Group IS used intraoral scans. The method from Dentbird was compared using 3 software packages from 3Shape, exocad, and MEDIT. The Hausdorff and Chamfer distances were used in this study. Three dental laboratory technicians experienced in the digital workflow evaluated clinical finish line acceptance and its Hausdorff and Chamfer distances. For statistical analysis, t tests were performed after the outliers had been removed using the Tukey interquartile range method (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Outliers identified by using the Tukey interquartile range method were more numerous in the semiautomatic methods than in the automatic methods. When considering data without outliers, the software performance was found to be similar for desktop scans of the trimmed casts. However, the method from Dentbird demonstrated statistically better results (P<.05) for the posterior tooth with finish lines in concave regions than the 3Shape, exocad, and MEDIT software programs. Furthermore, thresholds coherent with clinical acceptance were determined for the Hausdorff and Chamfer distances. The Hausdorff distance threshold was 0.366 mm for desktop scans and 0.566 mm for intraoral scans. For the Chamfer distance, the threshold was 0.026 for desktop scans and 0.100 for intraoral scans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The method from Dentbird demonstrated a comparable or better performance than the other software solutions, particularly excelling in finish line extraction for intraoral scans. Using a hybrid method combining deep learning and computer-aided design approaches enables the robust and accurate extraction of finish lines.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1286.e1-1286.e9"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138805662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effect of ceramic thickness on the polymerization quality and film thickness of dual-polymerizing versus heated light-polymerizing adhesive cement.","authors":"Bilal Secundar, Amirhossein Fathi, Kimia Baghaei, Ramin Atash","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.09.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>The clinical success of ceramic veneers cemented with preheated composite resin has been reported to be acceptable. Although the cementing technique requires sufficient light energy to activate its polymerization, the ability of light to penetrate through ceramic restorations of different thicknesses is unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the polymerization quality and bond joint thickness of a dual-component adhesive and a heated composite resin when bonding ceramic onlays of varying thicknesses.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sixty noncarious maxillary premolars, extracted for orthodontic or periodontal reasons, were divided into 6 groups (n=10) and sectioned apically to the marginal ridge. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) was used to create onlays of varying thicknesses. Following the manufacturers ' instructions, the onlays were cemented using a dual-polymerizing resin for group DP1, DP2, and DP3 groups and preheated light-polymerizing resin for groups LP1, LP2, and LP3. The numbers indicate onlay thickness in each group. Vickers testing was performed 24 hours after polymerization, with a 0.49-N static load applied for 10 seconds. Film thickness was analyzed under an optical microscope, and temperature changes were measured using a thermal imaging camera. Statistical analysis was done with the 2-factor mixed ANOVA tests (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Vickers hardness of a dual-polymerizing cement was lower compared with heated light-polymerizing cement (P<.05). Moreover, the thickness of the resin-ceramic restoration did not significantly affect the polymerization of a dual-polymerizing cement. However, the polymerization of the preheated light-polymerizing composite resin in group LP3 was significantly lower compared with other thicknesses (P<.05). In group LP3, the Vickers hardness of the tooth adjacent to the surface of the cement (DX2) was lower compared with indentations closer to the restoration surface (DX3, DX6), demonstrating a reduction in polymerization in the internal part. In addition, the mean film thickness of the dual-polymerizing groups (96 ±18 µm) was significantly lower than of the heated light-polymerizing groups (294 ±64 µm) (P<.05). A temperature reduction of 15 °C in the heated composite resin was also observed after 8 seconds CONCLUSIONS: The thickness of the ceramic restoration did not significantly affect the polymerization of a dual-polymerizing cement. However, the polymerization of the preheated light-polymerizing composite resin under the same ceramic restoration with a thickness of 3 mm was significantly lower. In addition, the mean film thickness for the dual-polymerizing composite resin groups was significantly lower than for the heated light-polymerizing composite resin groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1328.e1-1328.e6"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Survival and prosthetic complications of monolithic ceramic implant-supported single crowns and fixed partial dentures: A systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos, Fellippo Ramos Verri, Jéssica Marcela de Luna Gomes, Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior, Eduardo Miyashita, Gustavo Mendonça, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.11.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.11.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Monolithic ceramic implant-supported restorations have been used to rehabilitate partially edentulous patients. However, knowledge of the survival and prosthetic complications of single crowns (SCs) and fixed partial dentures (FPDs) is limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical performance of monolithic ceramic implant-supported SCs and FPDs in terms of survival and prosthetic complication rates.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The systematic review was registered on the prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42017078568). Five electronic databases were independently searched by 2 authors for articles published until May 2022. In addition, a hand search was performed in the nonpeer-reviewed literature, specific journals, and reference lists of included articles. A single-arm meta-analysis was performed by using the R program. The risk of bias and quality were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tools and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. A total of 1298 monolithic ceramic implant-supported restorations (1116 SCs and 182 FPDs) were evaluated in 1193 participants, with a median observation time of 24 months (range: 12 to 72 months). Meta-analysis indicated the proportion of failures and prosthetic complication rates of 2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1% to 4%) for SCs. No difference was observed for monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate SCs. In the FPDs, only monolithic zirconia was considered, with 1 failure reported totaling the proportion of failures of 0% (0% to 1%) and complication rates of 4% (0% to 12%). The most complications reported for both types of restorations were screw loosening, debonding, and minor chipping and were considered repairable. The included studies showed a low risk of bias and good quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of monolithic ceramic implant-supported SCs, independent of ceramic material, and monolithic zirconia implant-supported FPDs should be considered an effective and safe treatment option because of favorable short-term survival and low prosthetic complications. However, additional well-conducted studies with a longer-term follow-up and direct comparison between veneered restorations are recommended to reassess clinical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1237-1249"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10422827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}