Journal of Orthodontics最新文献

{"title":"Comparison of 3D Easy Box cone-beam computed tomography analysis with 2D Modified Easy Box on OPG as a prognostic tool for impacted maxillary canines: A pilot study.","authors":"Rochelle Dias, Himanshu Kanungo, Mukesh Gupta, Kratika Mishra, Akanksha Soni, Aayush Jaiswal","doi":"10.1177/14653125241242138","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125241242138","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess and compare the validity of 2D modified Easy Box and measurement of the Beta angle on standard conventional orthopantomogram (OPG) versus 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) OPG-constructed view.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective agreement study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim of this study was to construct an Easy Box on a standard conventional OPG and to validate this novel method by comparing it with the Easy Box method on 3D CBCT. After approval from the Ethics Committee, OPG and CBCT radiographs were obtained for the study from departmental records and five private practices in the same location (Indore, India). The radiographs were selected based on record availability and with written consent from the participants before the commencement of the study. The records were analysed to enable a comparison and to assess the accuracy of Easy Box construction on both 3D CBCT and standard conventional OPG radiographs. The location of the impacted canine within the Easy Box boundaries and the measurement of the Beta angle were determined on both views.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A perfect agreement was obtained for the comparison of 3D Easy Box CBCT analysis with 2D modified Easy Box on OPG for impacted maxillary canines (Kappa = 1.0). A Bland-Altman (LoA) analysis showed no proportional bias in the comparison of the Beta angle on 3D and 2D OPG radiographs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Beta angle and 2D modified Easy Box on a conventional OPG yield similar results when compared to Easy Box on 3D CBCT OPG-constructed view. The standard OPG was valuable and cost-effective, particularly in the early stages of diagnosis and treatment planning, either as a substitute or when CBCT was unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"345-353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140335998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Letter to the Editor: A Systematic Review a Day, Keeps the Reader Away!","authors":"Samer Mheissen","doi":"10.1177/14653125241268746","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125241268746","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"51 4","pages":"424-427"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142813601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Adult orthodontic patients: What is important to them?","authors":"Aoibheann Wall, Neil Hillyard, Fiona S Ryan, Susan J Cunningham","doi":"10.1177/14653125241256975","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125241256975","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand patients' motivations for pursuing treatment, to appreciate what information patients seek and to explore potential factors affecting decision making in adults considering, undergoing or who have had orthodontic treatment in the private sector.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional questionnaire study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 209 (83% women, 16% men, 1% preferred not to say) completed responses were received.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Once piloted, the final survey was made available online to adults in the United Kingdom (UK) and Republic of Ireland (RoI) who were either considering having orthodontic treatment, currently undergoing treatment or had recently completed treatment in the private sector.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most commonly selected motivating factor was to 'improve the appearance of my teeth' (82%). The information sought related predominantly to treatment duration (64%), potential end results (56%), types of appliances that were available (55%) and cost (52%). The two most commonly reported social factors that had influenced participants to consider treatment were 'seeing myself on social media' (31%) and 'it is more socially acceptable to have braces' (31%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While this area remains relatively underexplored in the literature, it is crucial to develop a comprehensive understanding due to the increasing number of adults seeking orthodontic treatment. This study not only reinforces the existing knowledge regarding adults seeking orthodontic treatment, such as the predominant role of aesthetics as a motivating factor, but also introduces some novel insights. Specifically, we highlight the influence of social factors on decision-making processes and the importance of effectively communicating the duration of treatment to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"366-374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141300809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Meet the Editors.","authors":"Farooq Ahmed","doi":"10.1177/14653125241270718","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125241270718","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"51 3","pages":"326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The William Houston gold medal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 2022: Two case reports.","authors":"Richard Leck","doi":"10.1177/14653125231191539","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125231191539","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper describes the orthodontic treatment of two cases that were successful in winning the William Houston Gold Medal at the Membership in Orthodontics Examinations of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh in 2022. Both cases discuss the management of palatally impacted maxillary canines and treatment was initiated during the emerging COVID-19 crisis and completed over a 27-month period. The first case describes the management of a 15-year-old female with a Class II division 1 incisor relationship complicated by a palatally impacted upper left canine, moderate upper and lower arch crowding, and a lower centreline discrepancy with an associated right lateral displacement on closure. Treatment involved open surgical exposure of the impacted canine, a quad helix appliance, premolar extractions, and upper and lower fixed appliances. The second case describes the management of a 14-year-old female with a Class III incisor relationship complicated by bilaterally impacted maxillary canines, impeded eruption of the lower right second molar, moderate lower and severe upper arch crowding, and an upper centreline discrepancy. These case reports aim to demonstrate the high standards of care achieved by Orthodontic Specialty Trainee Registrars in the UK and provide aspirational standards for future trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"292-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10110923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Meet the Editors.","authors":"Jennifer Haworth","doi":"10.1177/14653125241270726","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125241270726","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"51 3","pages":"327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Upcoming BOS Courses and Educational Events.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/14653125241270642","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125241270642","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"51 3","pages":"332-333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142289635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessment of patients' knowledge and preferences for the use of orthodontic aligners.","authors":"Joice Paim, Luiz Felipe Duarte de Souza, Tiago Fialho, Daniela Bezerra de Menezes Borba, Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas, Paula Cotrin, Vivian Binder Neis, Eduardo Ohira","doi":"10.1177/14653125241229456","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125241229456","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the knowledge and preference of patients treated at a Dental School in Jaraguá do Sul, Brazil, about using aligners and the reasons for choosing this device as a treatment option.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 82 participants aged 18-45 years recruited at a screening clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was completed in person using a tablet with digital forms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost half of the participants (49%) knew about aligners; 40% were aged 18-24 years, and 77% were female. When observing the images of the types of orthodontic appliances, the aligners had an acceptance rate of 80%. Among the reasons that led to the preference for choosing aligners, 68% cited aesthetics and 42% comfort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recently, clear aligners have become a popular choice for orthodontic treatment, particularly among adults. Despite their popularity and effectiveness, many patients still need more information about aligner treatment. Over half of the respondents did not know what orthodontic aligners were. Younger participants had more knowledge about aligners than older participants. Patients still need more knowledge about the types of appliances available for orthodontic treatment. When presented with images of the kinds of devices available, almost 80% of participants showed greater satisfaction with aligners.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"251-257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139697708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Periodontal outcomes of surgically exposed and orthodontically aligned buccally impacted maxillary canines: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Marina Nogueira de Castro Galvão Corrente, Guilherme Castro Lima Silva do Amaral, Rafael Costa Ribeiro, Cláudio Mendes Pannuti, Laura Grein Cavalcanti, Cristina Cunha Villar","doi":"10.1177/14653125241242815","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125241242815","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the periodontal outcomes of surgically exposed and orthodontically aligned buccally impacted maxillary canines to spontaneously erupted maxillary canines.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>An unrestricted search was carried out of indexed databases (Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus), reference lists of included studies, and grey literature published until December 2023.</p><p><strong>Data selection: </strong>Observational and experimental studies that addressed the focused question 'Do periodontal outcomes of buccally impacted maxillary canines that were surgically exposed and subsequently extruded and aligned using orthodontic alignment, differ from those of spontaneously erupted maxillary canines?' were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Study screening, selection and data extraction were performed independently by two authors, with disagreement resolved by a third reviewer. The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist and GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 857 citations were found and five studies were eligible for inclusion. Supragingival plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation were similar between impacted canines and their contralaterals in most studies. Meta-analyses revealed no significant differences in keratinised tissue width (prospective studies: MD = -0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.13-0.56, I² = 78%; retrospective studies: MD = 0.61, 95% CI = -1.51-2.72, I² = 94%). However, a meta-analysis of prospective studies showed slightly greater mean probing depth for impacted canines compared to their contralateral canines (prospective studies: MD = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.04-0.28, I² = 0%). The evidence certainty for keratinised tissue width and probing depth outcomes was low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgically exposed and orthodontically aligned buccally impacted canines have slightly greater probing depths, potential bone loss and increased clinical crown length, compared to their counterparts. However, these small differences (<1 mm) are unlikely to be clinically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"270-282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140335999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The effectiveness of bone anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in the management of class III skeletal malocclusion in children aged 11-14 years compared with an untreated control group: A multicentre two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Nicky Mandall, Wesam Aleid, Richard Cousley, Edith Curran, Susi Caldwell, Andrew DiBiase, Fiona Dyer, Simon Littlewood, Spencer Nute, Sarah Jayne Campbell, Simon Atkins, Sherif Bayoumi, Vyomesh Bhatt, Paul Chambers, Nicholas Goodger, Claire Bates, Ovais Malik, David Waring, Paul Bassett","doi":"10.1177/14653125241255139","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14653125241255139","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of bone anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in the management of class III skeletal malocclusion in children aged 11-14 years compared with an untreated control group in terms of perceived need for orthognathic surgery, skeletal and dental change, and psychological impact.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multicentre two-armed parallel randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Six UK hospital orthodontic units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 57 patients were randomly allocated into either the BAMP group (BAMPG) (n = 28) or a no treatment control group (CG) (n = 29).</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Data collection occurred at registration (DC1),18 months (DC2) and 3 years (DC3), where skeletal and dental changes were measured from lateral cephalograms and study models. Oral Aesthetic Subjective Impact Score (OASIS) and Oral Quality of Life (OHQOL) questionnaires were used to assess the psychological impact of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 12.9 ± 0.7 years and 12.6 ± 0.9 years in the BAMPG and CG, respectively. At DC2, the BAMPG achieved a class III ANB improvement of +0.6° compared with -0.7° in the CG (<i>P</i> = 0.004). The overjet improvement was +1.4 mm for the BAMPG and -0.2 mm for the CG (<i>P</i> = 0.002). There was no evidence of any other group differences for the other skeletal or dental cephalometric outcomes (<i>P</i> > 0.05) or the questionnaire data (OASIS <i>P</i> = 0.10, OHQOL <i>P</i> = 0.75). At DC2, the 18-month follow-up, 22% of the BAMPG achieved a positive overjet. At the 3-year follow-up (DC3), fewer participants in the BAMPG were perceived to need orthognathic surgery (48%) compared with 75% of participants in the CG (<i>P</i> = 0.04), with an odds ratio of 0.31 (95% confidence interval = 0.10-0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BAMP technique did not show any social or psychological benefits; however, the skeletal class III improvement in ANB and the overjet change were sufficient to reduce the perceived need for orthognathic surgery by 27% compared with the CG.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"228-239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141283973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}