The effect of chewing gum on the rate of en-masse space closure: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1177/14653125241256672
Chandnee Murugan, Vignesh Kailasam
{"title":"The effect of chewing gum on the rate of en-masse space closure: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Chandnee Murugan, Vignesh Kailasam","doi":"10.1177/14653125241256672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of chewing gum on the rate of space closure, oral hygiene, pain during space closure and appliance breakage in patients undergoing fixed appliance therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, single-centre, two-arm, parallel, double-blinded randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Orthodontic unit of a privately funded hospital, Chennai, India.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>In total, 28 participants were randomly allocated into a chewing gum group (CGG) (n = 14) or a control group (CG) (n = 14).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline data were collected at the start of retraction (T0), at 4 weeks (T1), 8 weeks (T2) and 12 weeks (T3) after the start of retraction. Rate of space closure, pain, oral hygiene and appliance breakage were assessed at T1, T2 and T3. Data were analysed using an independent <i>t</i>-test with <i>P</i> < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean rate of space closure in the CGG was 0.9 ± 0.2 mm/month and 0.8 ± 0.2 mm/month in the CG (mean difference 0.1mm/month ± 0.16; 95% confidence interval -0.055-0.26). In both the groups, oral hygiene became worse between T0 and T3. At T0 and T1, participants in the CGG reported less pain at 24 h and 7 days when compared to the CG (<i>P</i> < 0.05). At T2 and T3, participants in the CGG reported less pain at 0 h, 24 h and 7 days when compared to the CG (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Appliance breakage in both groups was minimal, with an odds ratio of 0.7 (95% CI 0.1-3.8) and was similar (<i>P</i> = 0.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a minimal increase that was clinically not significant in the rate of space closure with chewing gum. Chewing gum ensured better oral hygiene, helped alleviate pain and had no effect on appliance breakage during space closure.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"375-387"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125241256672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of chewing gum on the rate of space closure, oral hygiene, pain during space closure and appliance breakage in patients undergoing fixed appliance therapy.

Design: A prospective, single-centre, two-arm, parallel, double-blinded randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Orthodontic unit of a privately funded hospital, Chennai, India.

Participants: In total, 28 participants were randomly allocated into a chewing gum group (CGG) (n = 14) or a control group (CG) (n = 14).

Methods: Baseline data were collected at the start of retraction (T0), at 4 weeks (T1), 8 weeks (T2) and 12 weeks (T3) after the start of retraction. Rate of space closure, pain, oral hygiene and appliance breakage were assessed at T1, T2 and T3. Data were analysed using an independent t-test with P < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant.

Results: The mean rate of space closure in the CGG was 0.9 ± 0.2 mm/month and 0.8 ± 0.2 mm/month in the CG (mean difference 0.1mm/month ± 0.16; 95% confidence interval -0.055-0.26). In both the groups, oral hygiene became worse between T0 and T3. At T0 and T1, participants in the CGG reported less pain at 24 h and 7 days when compared to the CG (P < 0.05). At T2 and T3, participants in the CGG reported less pain at 0 h, 24 h and 7 days when compared to the CG (P < 0.05). Appliance breakage in both groups was minimal, with an odds ratio of 0.7 (95% CI 0.1-3.8) and was similar (P = 0.66).

Conclusion: There was a minimal increase that was clinically not significant in the rate of space closure with chewing gum. Chewing gum ensured better oral hygiene, helped alleviate pain and had no effect on appliance breakage during space closure.

口香糖对牙间隙关闭速度的影响:随机对照试验
目的:评估口香糖对接受固定矫治器治疗的患者的间隙闭合率、口腔卫生、间隙闭合过程中的疼痛以及矫治器破损的影响:前瞻性、单中心、双臂、平行、双盲随机对照试验:地点:印度钦奈一家私立医院的正畸科:共有 28 名参与者被随机分配到口香糖组(CGG)(14 人)或对照组(CG)(14 人):方法:收集开始牵引时(T0)、开始牵引后 4 周(T1)、8 周(T2)和 12 周(T3)的基线数据。在 T1、T2 和 T3 期分别对间隙闭合率、疼痛、口腔卫生和矫治器破损情况进行评估。数据采用独立的 t 检验进行分析,P < 0.05 为有统计学意义:CGG的平均间隙闭合率为0.9 ± 0.2 mm/月,CG的平均间隙闭合率为0.8 ± 0.2 mm/月(P = 0.07,95%置信区间[CI]分别为0.80-1.01(CGC)和0.70-0.91(CG))。两组参与者的口腔卫生状况在T0至T3期间都有所恶化。在T0和T1,与CG相比,CGC组的参与者在24小时和7天后报告的疼痛较轻(P < 0.05)。在 T2 和 T3,与 CGG 相比,CGG 参与者在 0 h、24 h 和 7 天时的疼痛感较轻(P < 0.05)。两组的矫治器破损情况都很轻微,几率比为 0.7(95% CI 0.1-3.8),且相似(P = 0.66):结论:咀嚼口香糖对牙间隙闭合率的影响很小,临床意义不大。咀嚼口香糖可确保更好的口腔卫生,有助于减轻疼痛,而且对矫治器在间隙关闭过程中的破损没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontics
Journal of Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthodontics has an international circulation, publishing papers from throughout the world. The official journal of the British Orthodontic Society, it aims to publish high quality, evidence-based, clinically orientated or clinically relevant original research papers that will underpin evidence based orthodontic care. It particularly welcomes reports on prospective research into different treatment methods and techniques but also systematic reviews, meta-analyses and studies which will stimulate interest in new developments. Regular features include original papers on clinically relevant topics, clinical case reports, reviews of the orthodontic literature, editorials, book reviews, correspondence and other features of interest to the orthodontic community. The Journal is published in full colour throughout.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信