Journal of orofacial pain最新文献

{"title":"Effect of propranolol on hypertonic saline-evoked masseter muscle pain and autonomic response in healthy women during rest and mental arithmetic task.","authors":"Karina Haugaard Bendixen,&nbsp;Astrid Juhl Terkelsen,&nbsp;Lene Baad-Hansen,&nbsp;Brian E Cairns,&nbsp;Peter Svensson","doi":"10.11607/jop.1013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled, crossover study the effect of a single dose of the nonselective β-adrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol (40 mg) on hypertonic saline (HS)-evoked masseter muscle pain and autonomic activity during rest and during a mental arithmetic task (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task, PASAT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen healthy women participated in two sessions in which propranolol or placebo was administered orally prior to two 5-minute infusions (30 minutes apart) of HS in the masseter muscle. The second HS infusion was combined with PASAT. HS-evoked pain intensity was scored on a numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 to 10). Heart rate variability and hemodynamic measures were recorded noninvasively (Task Force Monitor). Data were analyzed with repeated measurements analysis of variance (ANOVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propranolol did not reduce NRS pain scores compared with placebo but did induce significant autonomic changes with reduced heart rate and increased heart rate variability (standard deviations of all normal RR intervals; root mean square successive differences; low-frequency power; high-frequency power; and total power) independent of the mental task.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A single dose of propranolol had no effect on acute HS-evoked pain levels during rest or during mental arousal. However, it influenced the tone of the autonomic nervous system, possibly reflecting an anxiolytic effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 3","pages":"243-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.1013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31245428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Treatment of comorbid migraine and temporomandibular disorders: a factorial, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.","authors":"Daniela A G Goncalves,&nbsp;Cinara M Camparis,&nbsp;José G Speciali,&nbsp;Sabrina M Castanharo,&nbsp;Liliana T Ujikawa,&nbsp;Richard B Lipton,&nbsp;Marcelo E Bigal","doi":"10.11607/jop.1096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1096","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of single and concomitant treatment of migraine and temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in women with the comorbidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible female patients met International Classification of Headache Disorders, second edition (ICHD-2) criteria for migraine with or without aura and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for myofascial TMD (Grade ll or lll). After a run-in period (30 days), women with both migraine and TMD were enrolled into a four-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorial study testing the separate and joint effects of a migraine treatment (propranolol 90 mg) and a TMD treatment (stabilization splint [SS]) in four groups of patients. The four treatment groups were propranolol and SS (n = 22); propranolol placebo and SS (n = 23); propranolol and non-occlusal splint (NOS) (n = 23); and propranolol placebo and NOS (n = 21). The primary endpoint for migraine was change in headache days from baseline to the third month, and the secondary endpoint was change in days with at least moderate headache in the same period. The TMD endpoints included pain threshold and mandibular vertical range of motion. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA, Dunn's post-hoc test) or Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the primary endpoint, in intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses (n = 94), propranolol and SS were associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the number of headache days, relative to all other groups. For per-protocol (PP) Completer analyses (n = 89), differences in the number of headache days reached significance (P < .05). The propranolol and SS group was significantly superior to the other groups on all other headache endpoints and in disability, in both ITT and PP analyses. No significant differences among groups were seen for the TMD parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In women with TMD and migraine, migraine significantly improved only when both conditions were treated. The best treatment choice for TMD pain in women with migraine is yet to be defined.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 4","pages":"325-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.1096","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40277124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Development of labeled magnitude scales for the assessment of pain of dentin hypersensitivity.","authors":"Lisa J Heaton,&nbsp;Ashley P Barlow,&nbsp;Susan E Coldwell","doi":"10.11607/jop.954","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.954","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop and test labeled magnitude (LM) scales that are sensitive to variations in pain associated with dentin hypersensitivity (DH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative methods were used first to obtain words that describe the pain of DH. Magnitude estimation was then used to determine the position of these descriptive terms by relative magnitude along four vertical LM scales. To assess their DH, patients used the four LM scales following dentin stimulation with 4°C and 25°C water. The LM scales were then compared to visual analog scale (VAS) ratings by using eight pain scenarios of varying severity. Finally, participants with DH completed the four horizontal LM scales and VAS after dentin stimulation with 4°C and 25°C water. Within-subject t tests were used for comparisons between scales and water temperatures, and between-subject t tests were used for comparisons between participants with and without DH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants showed comparable differentiation between 4°C and 25°C water on VAS and three of the LM scale measures. Responses on the fourth LM scale showed better differentiation than VAS between the two water temperatures. Participants used a greater portion of the LM scales than VAS when rating low-level pain scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LM scales were shown to provide some advantages compared to standard VAS when used to evaluate DH-associated pain. These advantages may be generalized to other low-level pain conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 1","pages":"72-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.954","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31251270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Persistent dentoalveolar pain: the patient's experience.","authors":"Justin Durham,&nbsp;Catherine Exley,&nbsp;Mike T John,&nbsp;Donald R Nixdorf","doi":"10.11607/jop.1022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To build an understanding of the patient's experience and from this identify recurring themes that could form part of an item pool for further testing of persistent dentoalveolar pain disorder (PDAP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Proven cases of PDAP were identified from a clinical database, and a purposive maximum variation sample was drawn. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the sample by a single trained interviewer. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data collection and analysis occurred until data saturation (n = 20), with no new themes emerging. Analysis of the data was an iterative and inductive process broadly following the principles of the constant comparative method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recurrent themes emerging from the data were: difficulty in responding to history taking; duration and magnitude of pain; complex and confounding descriptors; common exacerbating factor; well-localized pain; deep pain; pressurized or pressure feeling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several common experiences that can be considered items were identified in the data. These items will add to the limited pre-existing item pool in the literature and allow testing of this item pool to determine those items best suited to form an adjunctive self-report diagnostic instrument for PDAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 1","pages":"6-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.1022","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31252417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Seven-year follow-up of patients diagnosed with atypical odontalgia: a prospective study.","authors":"Maria Pigg,&nbsp;Peter Svensson,&nbsp;Mark Drangsholt,&nbsp;Thomas List","doi":"10.11607/jop.1033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the long-term prognosis of 46 previously examined atypical odontalgia (AO) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2002 and 2009, AO patients completed validated instruments measuring pain characteristics (pain frequency and intensity), physical functioning (Graded Chronic Pain Severity, GCPS) and emotional functioning (Symptoms Checklist, SCL-90R). The main outcome was global improvement. Baseline data on quantitative somatosensory testing and responsiveness to lidocaine injection were available for a subgroup of patients. Paired tests compared baseline and follow-up data, and logistic regression explored the possible prognostic value of baseline data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 37 patients (80%) were obtained. Thirteen patients (35%; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 20.2%-52.5%) rated their overall pain status as significantly improved, 22 (60%; 95% CI 42.1%-75.3%) as a little improved or unchanged, and two patients (5%; 95% CI 0.7%-18.2%) as worse. Five patients (14%; 95% CI 4.5%-28.8%) were pain-free, indicated by a characteristic pain intensity score of 0. Average pain intensity decreased (from 5.7 ± 2.0 to 3.5 ± 2.4; P < .001). Pain frequency (P < .001) and GCPS (P < .001) also decreased, whereas SCL-90R scores remained unchanged and 26 of the 37 patients reported ongoing treatment. Low baseline pain intensity was the only factor predictive of favorable outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A third of the AO patients improved considerably over time, but for many of the patients, AO was a persistent and treatment-resistant condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 2","pages":"151-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.1033","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31395335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Research Diagnostic Criteria Axis II in screening and as a part of biopsychosocial subtyping of Finnish patients with temporomandibular disorder pain.","authors":"Tuija I Suvinen,&nbsp;Pentti Kemppainen,&nbsp;Yrsa Le Bell,&nbsp;Anna Valjakka,&nbsp;Tero Vahlberg,&nbsp;Heli Forssell","doi":"10.11607/jop.1145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1145","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis II variables in an initial psychosocial screening and as a part of biopsychosocial subtyping of Finnish referral patients with TMD pain for adjunct multidisciplinary assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive Finnish referral patients with TMD pain (n = 135) participated in this questionnaire-based survey. Psychosocial screening was based on Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) and culturally adjusted Symptom Checklist 90-revised (SCL-90R) depression scale scores and subtyping on GCPS pain-related interference in accordance with previous treatment tailoring studies. Biopsychosocial subtyping variables included symptoms of depression and somatization, general health, pain-related worry, sleep dysfunction, and coping ability. Subtype comparisons were analyzed with Bonferroni adjusted P values and multivariable logistic regression (SAS 9.3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on psychosocial screening, 44% of the patients were psychosocially uncompromised (TMD subtype 1), 33% moderately, and 23% severely compromised (TMD subtypes 2 and 3). Compared to TMD subtype 1, TMD subtype 2 patients reported intermediate scores, and the most vulnerable TMD subtype 3 had the poorest general health, most elevated depression, somatization, worry and sleep dysfunction, and poor coping ability (P < .05). According to multivariable logistic regression, depression and worry levels were significantly higher in TMD subtype 3 compared to TMD subtype 1, whilst patients in TMD subtypes 1 and 2 reported significantly better coping ability compared to TMD subtype 3 (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Finnish RDC/TMD Axis II was found reliable in initial TMD pain patient screening and with further biopsychosocial assessment identified three main TMD subtypes, two with compromised psychosocial profiles for adjunct multidisciplinary assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 4","pages":"314-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.1145","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40276035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Epidemiology of bruxism in adults: a systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Daniele Manfredini,&nbsp;Ephraim Winocur,&nbsp;Luca Guarda-Nardini,&nbsp;Daniel Paesani,&nbsp;Frank Lobbezoo","doi":"10.11607/jop.921","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.921","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To perform a systematic review of the literature dealing with the prevalence of bruxism in adult populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of the medical literature was performed to identify all peer-reviewed English-language papers dealing with the prevalence assessment of either awake or sleep bruxism at the general population level by the adoption of questionnaires, clinical assessments, and polysomnographic (PSG) or electromyographic (EMG) recordings. Quality assessment of the reviewed papers was performed according to the Methodological evaluation of Observational REsearch (MORE) checklist, which enables the identification of flaws in the external and internal validity. Cut-off criteria for an acceptable external validity were established to select studies for the discussion of prevalence data. For each included study, the sample features, diagnostic strategy, and prevalence of bruxism in relation to age, sex, and circadian rhythm, if available, were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five publications were included in the review. Several methodological problems limited the external validity of findings in most studies, and prevalence data extraction was performed only on seven papers. Of those, only one paper had a flaw less external validity, whilst internal validity was low in all the selected papers due to their self-reported bruxism diagnosis alone, mainly based on only one or two questionnaire items. No epidemiologic data were available from studies adopting other diagnostic strategies (eg, PSG, EMG). Generically identified \"bruxism\" was assessed in two studies reporting an 8% to 31.4% prevalence, awake bruxism was investigated in two studies describing a 22.1% to 31% prevalence, and prevalence of sleep bruxism was found to be more consistent across the three studies investigating the report of \"frequent\" bruxism (12.8% ± 3.1%). Bruxism activities were found to be unrelated to sex, and a decrease with age was described in elderly people.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present systematic review described variable prevalence data for bruxism activities. Findings must be interpreted with caution due to the poor methodological quality of the reviewed literature and to potential diagnostic bias related with having to rely on an individual's self-report of bruxism.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 2","pages":"99-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.921","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31395330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Females with sleep bruxism show lower theta and alpha electroencephalographic activity irrespective of transient morning masticatory muscle pain.","authors":"Susumu Abe,&nbsp;Maria Clotilde Carra,&nbsp;Nelly T Huynh,&nbsp;Pierre H Rompré,&nbsp;Gilles J Lavigne","doi":"10.11607/jop.999","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.999","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the hypothesis that the presence of transient morning masticatory muscle pain in young, healthy sleep bruxers (SBr) is associated with sex-related differences in sleep electroencephalographic (EEG) activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on morning masticatory muscle pain and sleep variables were obtained from visual analog scales and a second night of polysomnographic recordings. Nineteen normal control (CTRL) subjects were age- and sex-matched to 62 tooth-grinding SBr. Differences in sleep macrostructure (stage distribution and duration, number of sleep-stage shifts), number of rhythmic masticatory muscle activity (RMMA) events÷ hour, and EEG activity were analyzed blind to subject status. The influence of pain and gender in SBr and CTRL subjects was assessed with the Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, two-sample t test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low-intensity morning transient orofacial pain was reported by 71% of SBr, with no sex difference. RMMA event frequency was higher in SB than CTRL subjects (4.5÷hour vs 1.3÷hour; P < .001). SBr had fewer sleep-stage shifts, irrespective of sex or pain status. Female SBr had significantly lower theta and alpha EEG activity compared to female CTRL subjects (P = .03), irrespective of pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Female SBr had lower theta and alpha EEG activity irrespective of transient morning pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 2","pages":"123-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.999","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31395332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sex-specific differences in patients with temporomandibular disorders.","authors":"Martina Schmid-Schwap,&nbsp;Margit Bristela,&nbsp;Michael Kundi,&nbsp;Eva Piehslinger","doi":"10.11607/jop.970","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.970","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore potential differences in characteristics of patients that might account for sex-specific differences in temporomandibular disorders (TMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 502 patients presenting with TMD during 2000 to 2002 at the Outpatient Unit for Functional Disorders of the Medical University of Vienna underwent detailed evaluation of their medical history and assessment of clinical findings. The data obtained were assessed for sex-specific differences by analysis of variance and multiple regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 404 females (mean age ± SD: 40 ± 16 years; range 12 to 96 years) and 98 males (mean age 41 ± 16 years; range 16 to 78 years) were included. Their rating of their pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) showed a significantly higher pain intensity for females than for males (P = .004). Clinical assessment showed a significantly lower degree of mouth opening for females than for males (P < .001). While no sex-specific differences were noted for clicking phenomena of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and for the bite class of the patients, bite anomalies were significantly more frequent in male patients (P = .03). Palpation of masticatory muscles and the TMJ revealed significantly higher tenderness on palpation in female as compared to male patients (P = .001). Grouping by clicking, crepitation, and bruxism also showed greater pain (VAS) and more tenderness on palpation in females versus males. Females also showed peaks of prevalence of TMD in the age group below 25 years and in the group 55 to 60 years, whereas males had a more even age distribution. No external factors, such as exposure to stress, were found that moderated the sex difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Female TMD patients showed greater pain and muscle tenderness on palpation as compared to male TMD patients. They also showed a different age distribution of prevalence of TMD. These results were independent of subjective symptoms, clinical findings, and external factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 1","pages":"42-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.970","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31252421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Lavage therapy versus nonsurgical therapy for the treatment of arthralgia of the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Lukas M Vos,&nbsp;James J R Huddleston Slater,&nbsp;Boudewijn Stegenga","doi":"10.11607/jop.1007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To carry out a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate in patients with arthralgia of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) the effectiveness of TMJ lavage compared to nonsurgical treatment with regard to pain intensity and mandibular range of motion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The electronic databases Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1960-2012), PubMed÷Medline (1966-2012), and Embase (1966-2012) were systematically searched for relevant RCTs. References of relevant articles were searched for additional studies, as well as citing reports. Two authors independently performed data extraction by using predefined quality indicators. Relevant outcome data included reduction in pain, as assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS) or a pain score, and maximal mouth opening (MMO) before and 6 months after treatment. Included trials were combined using fixed and random effects meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three RCTs (222 patients) were included for meta-analysis. The statistically significant overall standardized mean difference (SMD) (P < .001) with regard to pain intensity was -1.07 (95% CI = -1.38, - 0.76) in favor of TMJ lavage. The MMO did not change significantly (P > .05, SMD = .05 [95% CI = -0.33, 0.23]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that lavage of the TMJ may be slightly more effective than nonsurgical treatment for pain reduction. However, this difference is not likely to be clinically relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 2","pages":"171-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.1007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31395227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}