治疗合并偏头痛和颞下颌紊乱:一项因子、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。

Daniela A G Goncalves, Cinara M Camparis, José G Speciali, Sabrina M Castanharo, Liliana T Ujikawa, Richard B Lipton, Marcelo E Bigal
{"title":"治疗合并偏头痛和颞下颌紊乱:一项因子、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。","authors":"Daniela A G Goncalves,&nbsp;Cinara M Camparis,&nbsp;José G Speciali,&nbsp;Sabrina M Castanharo,&nbsp;Liliana T Ujikawa,&nbsp;Richard B Lipton,&nbsp;Marcelo E Bigal","doi":"10.11607/jop.1096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of single and concomitant treatment of migraine and temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in women with the comorbidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible female patients met International Classification of Headache Disorders, second edition (ICHD-2) criteria for migraine with or without aura and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for myofascial TMD (Grade ll or lll). After a run-in period (30 days), women with both migraine and TMD were enrolled into a four-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorial study testing the separate and joint effects of a migraine treatment (propranolol 90 mg) and a TMD treatment (stabilization splint [SS]) in four groups of patients. The four treatment groups were propranolol and SS (n = 22); propranolol placebo and SS (n = 23); propranolol and non-occlusal splint (NOS) (n = 23); and propranolol placebo and NOS (n = 21). The primary endpoint for migraine was change in headache days from baseline to the third month, and the secondary endpoint was change in days with at least moderate headache in the same period. The TMD endpoints included pain threshold and mandibular vertical range of motion. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA, Dunn's post-hoc test) or Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the primary endpoint, in intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses (n = 94), propranolol and SS were associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the number of headache days, relative to all other groups. For per-protocol (PP) Completer analyses (n = 89), differences in the number of headache days reached significance (P < .05). The propranolol and SS group was significantly superior to the other groups on all other headache endpoints and in disability, in both ITT and PP analyses. No significant differences among groups were seen for the TMD parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In women with TMD and migraine, migraine significantly improved only when both conditions were treated. The best treatment choice for TMD pain in women with migraine is yet to be defined.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 4","pages":"325-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.1096","citationCount":"47","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of comorbid migraine and temporomandibular disorders: a factorial, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniela A G Goncalves,&nbsp;Cinara M Camparis,&nbsp;José G Speciali,&nbsp;Sabrina M Castanharo,&nbsp;Liliana T Ujikawa,&nbsp;Richard B Lipton,&nbsp;Marcelo E Bigal\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jop.1096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of single and concomitant treatment of migraine and temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in women with the comorbidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible female patients met International Classification of Headache Disorders, second edition (ICHD-2) criteria for migraine with or without aura and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for myofascial TMD (Grade ll or lll). After a run-in period (30 days), women with both migraine and TMD were enrolled into a four-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorial study testing the separate and joint effects of a migraine treatment (propranolol 90 mg) and a TMD treatment (stabilization splint [SS]) in four groups of patients. The four treatment groups were propranolol and SS (n = 22); propranolol placebo and SS (n = 23); propranolol and non-occlusal splint (NOS) (n = 23); and propranolol placebo and NOS (n = 21). The primary endpoint for migraine was change in headache days from baseline to the third month, and the secondary endpoint was change in days with at least moderate headache in the same period. The TMD endpoints included pain threshold and mandibular vertical range of motion. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA, Dunn's post-hoc test) or Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the primary endpoint, in intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses (n = 94), propranolol and SS were associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the number of headache days, relative to all other groups. For per-protocol (PP) Completer analyses (n = 89), differences in the number of headache days reached significance (P < .05). The propranolol and SS group was significantly superior to the other groups on all other headache endpoints and in disability, in both ITT and PP analyses. No significant differences among groups were seen for the TMD parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In women with TMD and migraine, migraine significantly improved only when both conditions were treated. The best treatment choice for TMD pain in women with migraine is yet to be defined.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orofacial pain\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"325-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.1096\",\"citationCount\":\"47\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orofacial pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orofacial pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

摘要

目的:探讨合并偏头痛和颞下颌紊乱(TMD)的女性患者单独和联合治疗的效果。方法:符合国际头痛疾病分类第2版(ICHD-2)偏头痛伴或不伴先兆标准和肌筋膜TMD研究诊断标准(ⅱ级或ⅱ级)的女性患者。经过一段磨合期(30天),同时患有偏头痛和TMD的女性被纳入一项四组、双盲、安慰剂对照、因子研究,对四组患者进行偏头痛治疗(普萘洛尔90mg)和TMD治疗(稳定夹板[SS])的单独和联合效果进行测试。4个治疗组分别为心得安和SS (n = 22);心得安安慰剂和SS (n = 23);心得安加无咬合夹板(NOS) (n = 23);心得安安慰剂和NOS (n = 21)。偏头痛的主要终点是从基线到第3个月头痛天数的变化,次要终点是在同一时间段内出现至少中度头痛的天数的变化。TMD终点包括疼痛阈值和下颌垂直运动范围。数据分析采用方差分析(ANOVA, Dunn’s事后检验)或Kruskal-Wallis检验。结果:对于主要终点,在意向治疗(ITT)分析(n = 94)中,相对于所有其他组,心得安和SS与头痛天数的无显著减少相关。对于每个方案(PP)完整分析(n = 89),头痛天数的差异达到显著性(P < 0.05)。在ITT和PP分析中,普萘洛尔和SS组在所有其他头痛终点和残疾方面均显著优于其他组。各组间TMD参数无显著差异。结论:在女性TMD和偏头痛患者中,只有当两种情况都得到治疗时,偏头痛才有明显改善。女性偏头痛患者TMD疼痛的最佳治疗选择尚未确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment of comorbid migraine and temporomandibular disorders: a factorial, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Aims: To investigate the effectiveness of single and concomitant treatment of migraine and temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in women with the comorbidity.

Methods: Eligible female patients met International Classification of Headache Disorders, second edition (ICHD-2) criteria for migraine with or without aura and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for myofascial TMD (Grade ll or lll). After a run-in period (30 days), women with both migraine and TMD were enrolled into a four-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorial study testing the separate and joint effects of a migraine treatment (propranolol 90 mg) and a TMD treatment (stabilization splint [SS]) in four groups of patients. The four treatment groups were propranolol and SS (n = 22); propranolol placebo and SS (n = 23); propranolol and non-occlusal splint (NOS) (n = 23); and propranolol placebo and NOS (n = 21). The primary endpoint for migraine was change in headache days from baseline to the third month, and the secondary endpoint was change in days with at least moderate headache in the same period. The TMD endpoints included pain threshold and mandibular vertical range of motion. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA, Dunn's post-hoc test) or Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: For the primary endpoint, in intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses (n = 94), propranolol and SS were associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the number of headache days, relative to all other groups. For per-protocol (PP) Completer analyses (n = 89), differences in the number of headache days reached significance (P < .05). The propranolol and SS group was significantly superior to the other groups on all other headache endpoints and in disability, in both ITT and PP analyses. No significant differences among groups were seen for the TMD parameters.

Conclusion: In women with TMD and migraine, migraine significantly improved only when both conditions were treated. The best treatment choice for TMD pain in women with migraine is yet to be defined.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of orofacial pain
Journal of orofacial pain 医学-牙科与口腔外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信