发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

BCDR International Arbitration Review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The Unique World of Construction Arbitration: A Middle East Perspective 建筑仲裁的独特世界:中东视角
BCDR International Arbitration Review Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.54648/bcdr2017002
Richard Harding QC
{"title":"The Unique World of Construction Arbitration: A Middle East Perspective","authors":"Richard Harding QC","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2017002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2017002","url":null,"abstract":"This article considers what makes construction arbitration in the Middle East different. It looks at how construction disputes arise and how they are dealt with in arbitration throughout the world, and then focuses on how the industry is different in the Middle East, and particularly the Gulf region, and how the practice of arbitrating such disputes in the region differs from elsewhere. Despite some obvious and well publicised difficulties with arbitration in the Middle East, the problems are mainly ones of efficiency, rather than fairness, and arbitration remains the preferred means of dispute resolution for the construction industry in the region.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"36 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132604348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tackling Global Construction Claims in the Middle East 处理中东地区的全球建筑索赔
BCDR International Arbitration Review Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.54648/bcdr2017011
Victor P. Leginsky, Aarta Alkarimi
{"title":"Tackling Global Construction Claims in the Middle East","authors":"Victor P. Leginsky, Aarta Alkarimi","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2017011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2017011","url":null,"abstract":"This article sets out factors arbitrators should consider when determining the validity of construction claims in cases where the contractor has chosen not to address breaches and losses from the perspective of their individual causes and effects, but to submit what is commonly referred to as a global claim. The authors consider case law from the United Kingdom and discuss relevant considerations against the backdrop of civil codes and general customs in the Gulf region.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124137142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Liquidated Damages for Delay in the Middle East: Not Etched in Stone 中东地区延迟支付违约金:并非板上钉钉
BCDR International Arbitration Review Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.54648/bcdr2017007
Joseph Chedrawe
{"title":"Liquidated Damages for Delay in the Middle East: Not Etched in Stone","authors":"Joseph Chedrawe","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2017007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2017007","url":null,"abstract":"Liquidated damages in construction contracts represent a fixed-rate mechanism to compensate employers for delays by contractors.Traditionally, common law courts do not interfere with the amount of liquidated damages due. By contrast, the local courts of certain civil law jurisdictions in the Middle East are empowered to adjust those liquidated damages, which raises important questions about how and when those courts will exercise that power and whether international arbitral tribunals will do the same.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116232517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Construction Arbitration and Standard Forms of Contract in the Middle East: National Culture and Its Impact on Perception and Practice 中东地区工程仲裁与合同规范形式:民族文化及其对认知和实践的影响
BCDR International Arbitration Review Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.54648/bcdr2017005
Aisha Nadar
{"title":"Construction Arbitration and Standard Forms of Contract in the Middle East: National Culture and Its Impact on Perception and Practice","authors":"Aisha Nadar","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2017005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2017005","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the role culture may play in contract administration and dispute resolution, and considers the implications of using international standard forms of contract in the Middle East.The influence of culture on law has been acknowledged in the criminal field, but not in the contractual field. National culture can influence perceptions of risk, management practices and views on justice. Given that standard forms of contract are used globally across a wide range of cultures, is there a need to tailor them to different national cultures?","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133918831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Law on Global Claims: An Area Ripe for Development in Egypt and the United Arab Emirates 全球索求法:埃及和阿拉伯联合酋长国发展的成熟领域
BCDR International Arbitration Review Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.54648/bcdr2017010
E. Rankin, Bryan Dayton
{"title":"The Law on Global Claims: An Area Ripe for Development in Egypt and the United Arab Emirates","authors":"E. Rankin, Bryan Dayton","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2017010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2017010","url":null,"abstract":"The authors consider whether global claims are permissible in the Middle East. Global claims permit a construction contractor to claim for damages without demonstrating the precise causal link between its contractual counterparty’s conduct and the contractor’s claimed damages. The topic of global claims has been thrust into the spotlight as a result of the English High Court’s decision in ‘Walter Lilly & Company Ltd v. Mackay & Anor’, which reaffirmed and expanded the permissibility of global claims in England. However, despite ‘Walter Lilly’, the scope of global claims in England appears limited. This is similar to the position of US law, which permits total loss claims (the US equivalent of global claims) in rare circumstances and prefers the use of other methodologies to calculate damages. While acknowledging that the position in the Middle East is largely uncertain, the authors argue that the obstacles faced by contractors in raising global claims in England and total loss claims in the United States are not as significant in Egypt and the United Arab Emirates. As a consequence, the authors predict that courts and arbitral tribunals applying Middle Eastern laws should be more receptive to global claims than they otherwise would be when applying English and US law.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115917429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Specialist Techniques for Construction Dispute Resolution: How Many Ways Can the Cat Be Skinned? 解决建筑纠纷的专业技术:有多少种方法可以让猫被剥皮?
BCDR International Arbitration Review Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.54648/bcdr2017006
Michael Patchett-Joyce
{"title":"Specialist Techniques for Construction Dispute Resolution: How Many Ways Can the Cat Be Skinned?","authors":"Michael Patchett-Joyce","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2017006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2017006","url":null,"abstract":"Parties to construction and infrastructure projects have been at the forefront of developing and/or adopting a range of dispute avoidance and resolution measures: partnering, dispute boards, adjudication, expedited (or ‘fast-track’) arbitration, and mediation. Closer analysis reveals that preferences vary according to region, as does the take-up of such initiatives.This article looks at what methods have worked in the Gulf, and what other techniques might usefully be deployed. Some methods, like partnering and expedited arbitration, may have been advocated previously with mixed results.The article contends that this was not because of some inherent unsuitability, but because the time was not right. The article looks at a new partnering initiative, discusses dispute boards and adjudication, and considers the continued roll-out of expedited procedures by arbitral institutions (including the new ICC Rules, effective as from March 2017).The article explains how innovative and creative dispute resolution techniques might usefully be applied in the context of Gulf mega-projects.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121248840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Legal Rules Commonly Applied to Contract Breaches in Construction Arbitrations in Egypt and the United Arab Emirates 埃及和阿拉伯联合酋长国工程仲裁中合同违约通常适用的法律规则
BCDR International Arbitration Review Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.54648/bcdr2017009
A. Waly
{"title":"Legal Rules Commonly Applied to Contract Breaches in Construction Arbitrations in Egypt and the United Arab Emirates","authors":"A. Waly","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2017009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2017009","url":null,"abstract":"Claims brought in construction disputes tend to relate to the recurrent issues of payment, interest, delay, defects, liquidated damages, and rescission of contract.When working in the Middle East, engineers acting as arbitrators and lawyers from the common law system need to be aware of the mandatory rules of the law applicable to the contract.This paper aims to shed light on the legal rules commonly applied to contract breaches in construction arbitrations in the Middle East. Specifically, the paper focuses on the relevant provisions of the laws of Egypt and the United Arab Emirates and explains the main variations between them.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"255 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124192039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Resolving Construction Disputes in Times of Crisis: The Theory of Exceptional Circumstances 危机时期的建筑纠纷解决:例外情况理论
BCDR International Arbitration Review Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.54648/bcdr2017013
Ziad Obeid
{"title":"Resolving Construction Disputes in Times of Crisis: The Theory of Exceptional Circumstances","authors":"Ziad Obeid","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2017013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2017013","url":null,"abstract":"The severing of diplomatic ties with Qatar and subsequent application of restrictive measures have highlighted the predicament in which parties to a construction contract may find themselves when external factors affect their performance.This article examines the defences available when the performance of pre-existing contractual obligations in the MENA region becomes excessively onerous due to external events, with a special focus on the theory of exceptional circumstances.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116888726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Truncated Tribunals 截断法庭
BCDR International Arbitration Review Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.54648/bcdr2017021
I. Selim, Georges Ghali
{"title":"Truncated Tribunals","authors":"I. Selim, Georges Ghali","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2017021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2017021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133371566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“And you are . . .?”—Dual Nationals in Investment Treaty Arbitration “你是……?”——投资条约仲裁中的双重国籍
BCDR International Arbitration Review Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.54648/bcdr2016024
H. Haeri, D. Walker
{"title":"“And you are . . .?”—Dual Nationals in Investment Treaty Arbitration","authors":"H. Haeri, D. Walker","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2016024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2016024","url":null,"abstract":"The issue of dual nationals in investment treaty arbitration goes beyond self-identification and involves questions of treaty interpretation and, in some cases, principles developed within the framework of diplomatic protection. This article provides an overview of jurisprudence concerning “who” a person really is in international investment law. It addresses the complex interplay between national and international law with regard to nationality, as well as the contrasting treatment of natural persons and corporate bodies as investors.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"289 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115956071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信