{"title":"处理中东地区的全球建筑索赔","authors":"Victor P. Leginsky, Aarta Alkarimi","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2017011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article sets out factors arbitrators should consider when determining the validity of construction claims in cases where the contractor has chosen not to address breaches and losses from the perspective of their individual causes and effects, but to submit what is commonly referred to as a global claim. The authors consider case law from the United Kingdom and discuss relevant considerations against the backdrop of civil codes and general customs in the Gulf region.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tackling Global Construction Claims in the Middle East\",\"authors\":\"Victor P. Leginsky, Aarta Alkarimi\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/bcdr2017011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article sets out factors arbitrators should consider when determining the validity of construction claims in cases where the contractor has chosen not to address breaches and losses from the perspective of their individual causes and effects, but to submit what is commonly referred to as a global claim. The authors consider case law from the United Kingdom and discuss relevant considerations against the backdrop of civil codes and general customs in the Gulf region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BCDR International Arbitration Review\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BCDR International Arbitration Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2017011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2017011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tackling Global Construction Claims in the Middle East
This article sets out factors arbitrators should consider when determining the validity of construction claims in cases where the contractor has chosen not to address breaches and losses from the perspective of their individual causes and effects, but to submit what is commonly referred to as a global claim. The authors consider case law from the United Kingdom and discuss relevant considerations against the backdrop of civil codes and general customs in the Gulf region.