Locke Studies最新文献_第4页

Review of David Sytsma's Richard Baxter and the Mechanical Philosophers David Sytsma的《Richard Baxter and the Mechanical Philosophers》书评

Locke Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-19 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2019.6246

P. Connolly

引用次数: 0

Review of Christopher Borsing's Daniel Defoe and the Representation of Personal Identity 鲍辛《丹尼尔·笛福与人格同一性的再现》述评

Locke Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-19 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2019.6245

Elizabeth R. Napier

引用次数: 0

Review of The Intellectual Properties of Learning: A Prehistory from Saint Jerome to John Locke by John Willinsky 《学习的知识产权:从圣杰罗姆到约翰·洛克的史前史》，约翰·威林斯基著

Locke Studies Pub Date : 2018-12-18 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2018.6200

R. Spinello

引用次数: 1

Shaftesbury, Locke, and Their Revolutionary Letter? [Corrigendum] 沙夫茨伯里、洛克和他们的革命书信?(勘误表)

Locke Studies Pub Date : 2018-12-08 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2018.6177

D. Deluna

{"title":"Shaftesbury, Locke, and Their Revolutionary Letter? [Corrigendum]","authors":"D. Deluna","doi":"10.5206/LS.2018.6177","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5206/LS.2018.6177","url":null,"abstract":"A correction of an article originally published in vol 17 (2017). \u0000In 1675, the anonymous Letter to a Person of Quality was condemned in the House of Lords and ordered to be burned by the public hangman. A propagandistic work that has long been attributed to Anthony Ashley Cooper, 1st Earl of Shaftesbury, and less certainly to his secretary John Locke, it traduced hard-line Anglican legislation considered in Parliament that year—namely the Test Bill, proposing that office-holders and MPs swear off political militancy and indeed any efforts to reform the Church and State. Careful examination of the text of the Letter, and that of one of its sources in the Reasons against the Bill for the Test, also circulated in 1675, reveals the presence of highly seditious passages of covert historical allegory. Hitherto un-noted by modern scholars, this allegory compared King Charles II to the weak and intermittently mad Henry VI, while agitating for armed revolt against a government made prey to popish and French captors. The discovery compels modification, through chronological revision and also re-assessment of the probability of Locke’s authorship of the Letter, of Richard Ashcraft’s picture of Shaftesbury and Locke as first-time revolutionaries for the cause of religious tolerance in the early 1680s. Even more significantly, it lends support to Ashcraft’s view of the nature and intent of duplicitous published writings from the Shaftesbury circle, whose members included Robert Ferguson, ‘the Plotter’ and pamphleteer at home in the world of skilled biblical hermeneutics. Cultivated for stealthy revolutionary purposes, these writings came with designs of engaging discrete reading networks within England’s culture of Protestant dissent.","PeriodicalId":165811,"journal":{"name":"Locke Studies","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129546317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Review of Thomas Reid and the Problem of Secondary Qualities by Andrew Shrock 评述托马斯·里德与安德鲁·施罗克的次要品质问题

Locke Studies Pub Date : 2018-11-30 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2018.5448

A. Crosby

引用次数: 0

One Body of People 一群人

Locke Studies Pub Date : 2018-11-25 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2018.423

Brian Smith

引用次数: 2

Roland Hall 罗兰•霍尔

Locke Studies Pub Date : 2018-10-22 DOI: 10.5206/ls.2018.5769

T. Stanton

引用次数: 0

Review of Measuring the Distance between Locke and Toland by Jonathan S. Marko 乔纳森·s·马尔科《衡量洛克与托兰之间的距离》述评

Locke Studies Pub Date : 2018-09-27 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2018.5427

Stewart Duncan

引用次数: 0

Strings, Physies, and Hogs Bristles 弦，物理和猪鬃

Locke Studies Pub Date : 2018-07-30 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2018.1512

Allison Kuklok

{"title":"Strings, Physies, and Hogs Bristles","authors":"Allison Kuklok","doi":"10.5206/LS.2018.1512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5206/LS.2018.1512","url":null,"abstract":"It is often claimed that classification, on Locke’s view, proceeds by attending to the similarities between things,1 and it is widely argued that nothing about the sensible similarities between things determines how we are to sort them, in which case sorting substances at the phenomenal level must be arbitrary. However, acquaintance with the “internal” or hidden qualities of substances might yet reveal objective boundaries. Citing what I refer to as the Watch passage [henceforth Watches], many commentators claim that classification at the microphysical level must also be arbitrary. They conclude that sorting is arbitrary at any level of description. I refer to this as the standard reading of Locke on classification. \u0000In this paper I argue that Locke does not claim that sorting is arbitrary, either at the phenomenal level, or at the microphysical level. First, Locke does not claim in Watches that sorting is arbitrary at the microphysical level. The existence or nonexistence of objective boundaries at the microphysical level is not Watches’ topic and the passage is in fact silent on that question. Here, the standard reading mistakes a claim about the nature of the task of locating “specific differences” for a claim about the nature of the task of classification. This diagnosis proves instructive, for I argue that a similar conflation underwrites the standard reading’s claim that sorting at the phenomenal level must be arbitrary. Far from arbitrarily choosing how to sort things in terms of their phenomenal similarities, Locke thought that the mind simply follows nature’s lead. This characterization of the mind’s activity, I go on to argue, accords well with Locke’s claim that species are the workmanship of the understanding.","PeriodicalId":165811,"journal":{"name":"Locke Studies","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132372312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Review of The Well-Ordered Universe: The Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish by Deborah Boyle 《有序的宇宙:玛格丽特·卡文迪什的哲学》黛博拉·博伊尔著

Locke Studies Pub Date : 2018-07-30 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2018.3792

David Cunning

引用次数: 0