一群人

Locke Studies Pub Date : 2018-11-25 DOI:10.5206/LS.2018.423
Brian Smith
{"title":"一群人","authors":"Brian Smith","doi":"10.5206/LS.2018.423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe purpose of this paper is to challenge the wide-spread belief that Locke advocated for the disposition of native peoples’ land due to their savagery or because they used land wastefully and inefficiently. These represent two sides of what I call the punishment thesis. Not only are there are good textual reasons in the Second Treatise (and elsewhere) to think that Locke was not interested in punishing native peoples for violating the natural law, but the history of Locke’s involvement with the Carolina colony also tells a remarkably different story—namely, Locke appears to direct the brunt of his moral argument against European settlers, not the native peoples. \n","PeriodicalId":165811,"journal":{"name":"Locke Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One Body of People\",\"authors\":\"Brian Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.5206/LS.2018.423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe purpose of this paper is to challenge the wide-spread belief that Locke advocated for the disposition of native peoples’ land due to their savagery or because they used land wastefully and inefficiently. These represent two sides of what I call the punishment thesis. Not only are there are good textual reasons in the Second Treatise (and elsewhere) to think that Locke was not interested in punishing native peoples for violating the natural law, but the history of Locke’s involvement with the Carolina colony also tells a remarkably different story—namely, Locke appears to direct the brunt of his moral argument against European settlers, not the native peoples. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":165811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Locke Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Locke Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5206/LS.2018.423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Locke Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/LS.2018.423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这篇论文的目的是挑战广泛传播的信念,即洛克主张处置土著人民的土地,因为他们的野蛮或因为他们浪费和低效地使用土地。这代表了我所说的惩罚命题的两个方面。不仅在《政府论第二篇》(以及其他地方)中有很好的文本理由认为洛克对惩罚违反自然法则的土著人民不感兴趣,而且洛克与卡罗莱纳殖民地的历史也讲述了一个截然不同的故事——即,洛克似乎把他的道德争论的矛头指向了欧洲定居者,而不是土著人民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One Body of People
The purpose of this paper is to challenge the wide-spread belief that Locke advocated for the disposition of native peoples’ land due to their savagery or because they used land wastefully and inefficiently. These represent two sides of what I call the punishment thesis. Not only are there are good textual reasons in the Second Treatise (and elsewhere) to think that Locke was not interested in punishing native peoples for violating the natural law, but the history of Locke’s involvement with the Carolina colony also tells a remarkably different story—namely, Locke appears to direct the brunt of his moral argument against European settlers, not the native peoples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信