发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Locke Studies最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Recent Publications 最近的出版物
Locke Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-16 DOI: 10.5206/ls.2019.8640
John C. Attig
{"title":"Recent Publications","authors":"John C. Attig","doi":"10.5206/ls.2019.8640","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5206/ls.2019.8640","url":null,"abstract":"A list of 137 works related to Locke, published between 2017 and 2019 and added to the John Locke Bibliography since the Recent Publications on Locke published in Locke Studies vol. 18.","PeriodicalId":165811,"journal":{"name":"Locke Studies","volume":"554 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123115707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Replies to My Critics 对我的批评的回复
Locke Studies Pub Date : 2019-12-20 DOI: 10.5206/ls.2019.8433
Michael Jacovides
{"title":"Replies to My Critics","authors":"Michael Jacovides","doi":"10.5206/ls.2019.8433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5206/ls.2019.8433","url":null,"abstract":"This is a revised version of a paper presented at the APA Eastern Division's 115th annual meeting in New York on Monday January 07, 2019. It was presented at session 2O Author Meets Critics: Michael Jacovides, Locke’s Image of the World. The session chair was Antonia LoLordo (University of Virginia), the critics were Robert Pasnau (University of Colorado Boulder) and Kathryn Tabb (Columbia University), and the author was Michael Jacovides (Purdue University).","PeriodicalId":165811,"journal":{"name":"Locke Studies","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130536773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Query concerning the Specifics of the Problematic that Elicits Locke’s Essay, at I.i.2, 44 and I.i.7, 47 对引出洛克文章的问题的具体问题的质疑，见第1章第2、44节和第7、47节
Locke Studies Pub Date : 2019-08-25 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2019.8235
Bruce Merrill
{"title":"Query concerning the Specifics of the Problematic that Elicits Locke’s Essay, at I.i.2, 44 and I.i.7, 47","authors":"Bruce Merrill","doi":"10.5206/LS.2019.8235","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5206/LS.2019.8235","url":null,"abstract":"This is a query regarding what and whom Locke refers to in passages from Essay I.i.2 and I.i.7.","PeriodicalId":165811,"journal":{"name":"Locke Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126932047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Locke and Holenmerism 洛克和霍伦墨主义
Locke Studies Pub Date : 2019-08-14 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2019.6242
G. D. Biase
{"title":"Locke and Holenmerism","authors":"G. D. Biase","doi":"10.5206/LS.2019.6242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5206/LS.2019.6242","url":null,"abstract":"Locke’s conception of God’s manner of being present everywhere is unclear. As Jasper Reid noted in The Metaphysics of Henry More, Locke seemed to agree with the Cambridge Platonist Henry More that God, like spirits, is substantially present in space (a conception which More labelled “anti-Nullibism”); however, it is not clear whether he endorsed More’s idea of God as an infinitely extended being, filling space with His amplitude of presence, or rather the alternative, scholastic conception, which More named “holenmerism” and which affirmed that God is present everywhere as a whole in the whole and a whole in the parts. The paper attempts to explore this question in detail by focusing on an episode in Locke’s later correspondence, which suggests that he voluntarily maintained an ambiguous attitude towards holenmerism. The episode focuses on the dispute which Locke had with Johannes Hudde in 1697 on how to prove God’s uniqueness; the “physical” proof he provided to settle the dispute could support both holenmerism and anti-holenmerism. However, Locke’s proof relied heavily on the analogy between spirits and bodies which he had drawn in the Essay, when he had defined their identity over time in the same way; the paper suggests that this and other evidence coming from the Essay, involving Locke’s reading of Newton’s De gravitatione, seems to indicate that he conceived of anti-holenmerism as the hypothesis to be preferred from an epistemic point of view.","PeriodicalId":165811,"journal":{"name":"Locke Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126273654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of Vincent's Theories de l'etat et problemes coloinaux (XVIe-XVIIIe siecle) 文森特的国家理论与殖民问题综述(16 - 18世纪)
Locke Studies Pub Date : 2019-08-13 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2019.6305
P. Corcoran
{"title":"Review of Vincent's Theories de l'etat et problemes coloinaux (XVIe-XVIIIe siecle)","authors":"P. Corcoran","doi":"10.5206/LS.2019.6305","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5206/LS.2019.6305","url":null,"abstract":"A review of Gregoire Vincent's Theories de l'etat et problemes coloniaux (XVIe-XVIIIe siecle) (Paris: Honore Champion).","PeriodicalId":165811,"journal":{"name":"Locke Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133705930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of Weinberg's Consciousness in Locke 温伯格的洛克意识论述评
Locke Studies Pub Date : 2019-06-16 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2019.7926
Matthew D. Priselac
{"title":"Review of Weinberg's Consciousness in Locke","authors":"Matthew D. Priselac","doi":"10.5206/LS.2019.7926","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5206/LS.2019.7926","url":null,"abstract":"A review of Shelley Weinberg's recent book Consciousness in Locke (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).","PeriodicalId":165811,"journal":{"name":"Locke Studies","volume":"243 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122712119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discussion Piece 讨论部分
Locke Studies Pub Date : 2019-05-03 DOI: 10.5206/ls.2019.7903
Martin Lenz
{"title":"Discussion Piece","authors":"Martin Lenz","doi":"10.5206/ls.2019.7903","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5206/ls.2019.7903","url":null,"abstract":"This offers a social or conventionalist account of the representational character of Lockean complex ideas. The point is that the precise ingredients of our complex ideas, the structure and amount of simple ideas belonging to them, are determined by the naming practice in a given speech community. Thus, although the ingredients themselves have a causal origin, the way the ingredients are bound into bundles and used in thinking is a matter of convention.","PeriodicalId":165811,"journal":{"name":"Locke Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116872847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discussion Piece 讨论部分
Locke Studies Pub Date : 2019-04-23 DOI: 10.5206/ls.2019.7597
John C. Attig
{"title":"Discussion Piece","authors":"John C. Attig","doi":"10.5206/ls.2019.7597","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5206/ls.2019.7597","url":null,"abstract":"A brief discussion of the material in the newly published title from the Clarendon Edition of the Works of John Locke, Literary and Historical Writings.","PeriodicalId":165811,"journal":{"name":"Locke Studies","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116252062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Between Hobbes and Locke 在霍布斯和洛克之间
Locke Studies Pub Date : 2019-02-06 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2019.5439
Jacob Donald Chatterjee
{"title":"Between Hobbes and Locke","authors":"Jacob Donald Chatterjee","doi":"10.5206/LS.2019.5439","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5206/LS.2019.5439","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a new understanding of how the context of Restoration debates around toleration, magisterial authority and political obligation impinged upon Locke’s mature thought. It proposes that prominent Anglican clergymen, by utilising Hobbist ideas in their arguments for religious conformity, transformed the debate around toleration. In particular, Samuel Parker’s Discourse of Ecclesiastical Politie’s potent mix of Hobbism, theological moralism and Scholastic natural law led to important nonconformists, such as Owen and Ferguson, reshaping their arguments in response. They were forced to make an argument upon first principles as to precisely why Parker’s naturalistic account of ecclesiastical authority was inadequate to justify their own particular view of religious institutions. Crucially, the specific features of Parker’s argument, led to John Humfrey, a largely overlooked figure, developing a set of ideas that preconfigured Locke’s later thought. This article then highlights Locke’s creative engagement with the ideas of his time, by charting the changes to Locke’s ecclesiology and view of natural law from 1667-1674, alongside the similar conceptual shifts made by Humfrey.","PeriodicalId":165811,"journal":{"name":"Locke Studies","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132183724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Review of Victor Nuovo's John Locke: The Philosopher as Christian Virtuoso 书评维克多·诺沃的《约翰·洛克:作为基督教艺术大师的哲学家》
Locke Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-19 DOI: 10.5206/LS.2019.6247
P. Connolly
{"title":"Review of Victor Nuovo's John Locke: The Philosopher as Christian Virtuoso","authors":"P. Connolly","doi":"10.5206/LS.2019.6247","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5206/LS.2019.6247","url":null,"abstract":"A review of Victor Nuovo's recent book John Locke: The Philosopher as Christian Virtuoso (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).","PeriodicalId":165811,"journal":{"name":"Locke Studies","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134619798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信