Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter最新文献_第3页

Aristoteles im Spiegel antiker Biographien

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.00020.FLA

H. Flashar

引用次数: 0

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.00021.MIT

Evelina Miteva

{"title":"I Want to Break Free","authors":"Evelina Miteva","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.00021.MIT","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.00021.MIT","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Albertus Magnus is known for his rational approach to explaining various phenomena; a method that would be acquired and\u0000 applied by his pupil Thomas Aquinas as well. In this paper, I focus on the concept of freedom, i. e., on the question of what it is that\u0000 constitutes the freedom of free will in the account of Albert the Great. I investigate this question from the perspective of natural\u0000 philosophy, a field that Albert was particularly interested in. In the first part of the paper, I study Albert’s definition of free will and\u0000 its implications as they are tackled in De homine, De anima, and Ethica. Albert regards free will as a\u0000 capacity of the rational soul, capable of choosing from opposites. Albert confronts the definitions of free will presented by Augustine,\u0000 Bernard of Clairvaux, and Anselm of Canterbury, and in each of these cases he advances his argument from the perspective of psychology. In\u0000 the second part of the paper, I identify the topics in which the general definition of free will is applied in a naturalistic context. Those\u0000 are the debates on fate and free will, on the question whether animals have free will and, finally, on natural circumstances such as age or\u0000 gender, limiting the freedom of free will. Subsequently, I aim at expounding Albert’s balanced, yet not tension-free position in the debate\u0000 between determinism and free action. Although several extensive studies on fate in Albert have been produced, the problem of free choice in\u0000 Albert’s works remains surprisingly understudied. The present paper intends to open a path for further research and debates on this relevant\u0000 topic.","PeriodicalId":165187,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130296984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Christina Kreuzwieser, Der Begriff ‚natura‘ und seine ethische Relevanz in Senecas Prosaschriften Christina Kreuzwieser‚natura’一词和他的道德相关性在Senecas Prosaschriften

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.00032.ROT

Stefan Röttig

引用次数: 0

Platon, Der Staat Platon, Der Staat

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI: 10.1075/bpjam.00028.duf

Stefan Düfel

引用次数: 0

‚David Armenius philosophus‘

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.00023.JEC

Udo Reinhold Jeck

{"title":"‚David Armenius philosophus‘","authors":"Udo Reinhold Jeck","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.00023.JEC","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.00023.JEC","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000At the centre of the philosophical tradition of Armenia is a thinker who in the Western tradition carries the\u0000Latin names ‘David Armenius philosophus’ or ‘David invincibilis’. Today, international philosophical-historical research is\u0000increasingly concerned with the enigmatic corpus of the works that have been handed down under the name of David. The\u0000historical-critical exploration of early Armenian philosophy and its specific achievements, as well as its intense relationship to\u0000late antique Byzantine thought, were, however, initiated by important scholars of Western Europe at the beginning of the 19th\u0000century. Before this time, there were few reliable references to ‘David’ in Western European research literature. It was the\u0000orientalist Carl Friedrich Neumann (1798–1870) who brought about the turnaround. He studied in Heidelberg with Creuzer and Hegel,\u0000learned the Armenian language from the Mechitarists in Venice, and found inspiration in Paris. Then he examined the available\u0000Armenian and Greek sources of the Corpus Davidis and collected his findings in a monograph in 1829. Neumann’s deeply philosophical\u0000mind is clearly revealed in this treatise, entitled Mémoire sur la vie et les ouvrages de David. With great certitude, he\u0000traced down the pieces of information from David’s writings, as well as from the related ancient Armenian sources, which had great\u0000relevance for further research. These findings included communications on the biography of David and his own works, as well as on\u0000Aristotle, late antique Aristotelianism and Neoplatonism. Almost inevitably, Neumann also fell victim to errors, which, however,\u0000does not diminish his importance as a pioneer of research into late antique Armenian philosophy. Neumann put David on the map for\u0000Western scholars, thus prompting a wider interest in the hitherto isolated Armenian philosophical thought for the first time.","PeriodicalId":165187,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126625650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Otfried Höffe (Hrsg.), Ciceros Staatsphilosophie. Ein kooperativer Kommentar zu De re publica und De legibus 西塞罗的《国圣经》这篇和法国和吉尔贝的合作评论

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI: 10.1075/bpjam.00031.pus

S. Puschmann

引用次数: 0

Peter Kuhlmann: Die Philosophie der Stoa: Seneca, Epistulae morales

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.00033.GRO

J. Gross

引用次数: 0

Die Disputation des Henning Hildensen zur Isagoge des Porphyrios 海宁希尔森的争论变成了珀尔菲利奥的伊萨克

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.00024.WOH

Hans-Ulrich Wöhler

引用次数: 0

Marsilius of Inghen’s (?) Question Utrum dialectica est ars artium et scientia scientiarum Preservedin Cod. Oxford, Bodleian Library, Canon. Misc. 381

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.00025.WOJ

Hanna Wojtczak, Maciej Stanek

引用次数: 0

Alexander Brungs/Vilem Mudroch/Peter Schulthess (Hrsg.): Die Philosophie des Mittelalters. Band IV: 13. Jahrhundert

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI: 10.1075/bpjam.00035.duf

Stefan Düfel

引用次数: 0