Udo Reinhold Jeck
{"title":"‚David Armenius philosophus‘","authors":"Udo Reinhold Jeck","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.00023.JEC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nAt the centre of the philosophical tradition of Armenia is a thinker who in the Western tradition carries the\nLatin names ‘David Armenius philosophus’ or ‘David invincibilis’. Today, international philosophical-historical research is\nincreasingly concerned with the enigmatic corpus of the works that have been handed down under the name of David. The\nhistorical-critical exploration of early Armenian philosophy and its specific achievements, as well as its intense relationship to\nlate antique Byzantine thought, were, however, initiated by important scholars of Western Europe at the beginning of the 19th\ncentury. Before this time, there were few reliable references to ‘David’ in Western European research literature. It was the\norientalist Carl Friedrich Neumann (1798–1870) who brought about the turnaround. He studied in Heidelberg with Creuzer and Hegel,\nlearned the Armenian language from the Mechitarists in Venice, and found inspiration in Paris. Then he examined the available\nArmenian and Greek sources of the Corpus Davidis and collected his findings in a monograph in 1829. Neumann’s deeply philosophical\nmind is clearly revealed in this treatise, entitled Mémoire sur la vie et les ouvrages de David. With great certitude, he\ntraced down the pieces of information from David’s writings, as well as from the related ancient Armenian sources, which had great\nrelevance for further research. These findings included communications on the biography of David and his own works, as well as on\nAristotle, late antique Aristotelianism and Neoplatonism. Almost inevitably, Neumann also fell victim to errors, which, however,\ndoes not diminish his importance as a pioneer of research into late antique Armenian philosophy. Neumann put David on the map for\nWestern scholars, thus prompting a wider interest in the hitherto isolated Armenian philosophical thought for the first time.","PeriodicalId":165187,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.00023.JEC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亚美尼亚哲学传统的中心人物是一位思想家,在西方传统中,他有着拉丁文的名字“大卫·亚美尼亚哲学”或“无敌大卫”。今天,国际哲学史研究越来越关注那些以大卫的名义流传下来的神秘作品。然而,对早期亚美尼亚哲学及其具体成就的历史批判探索,以及它与晚期古代拜占庭思想的密切关系,是在19世纪初由西欧的重要学者发起的。在此之前,西欧研究文献中很少有可靠的“大卫”参考文献。正是东方学家卡尔·弗里德里希·诺伊曼(1798-1870)带来了这种转变。他在海德堡师从克鲁泽(Creuzer)和黑格尔(Hegel),在威尼斯师从机械师(mecitalist)学习亚美尼亚语,在巴黎找到灵感。然后,他检查了《大卫文集》中可用的阿曼文和希腊文资料,并在1829年的专著中收集了他的发现。诺伊曼深刻的哲学思想在这篇题为《大卫的生活与愤怒》的论文中得到了清晰的揭示。他非常确定地从大卫的著作和相关的古代亚美尼亚文献中找到了一些信息,这些信息与进一步的研究有很大的关系。这些发现包括大卫的传记和他自己的作品,以及亚里士多德、晚期古代亚里士多德主义和新柏拉图主义。几乎不可避免的是,诺伊曼也成为错误的受害者,然而,这并不影响他作为研究晚期古代亚美尼亚哲学的先驱的重要性。诺伊曼使大卫在西方学者的视野中崭露头角,从而第一次引起了对迄今为止孤立的亚美尼亚哲学思想的更广泛的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‚David Armenius philosophus‘
At the centre of the philosophical tradition of Armenia is a thinker who in the Western tradition carries the Latin names ‘David Armenius philosophus’ or ‘David invincibilis’. Today, international philosophical-historical research is increasingly concerned with the enigmatic corpus of the works that have been handed down under the name of David. The historical-critical exploration of early Armenian philosophy and its specific achievements, as well as its intense relationship to late antique Byzantine thought, were, however, initiated by important scholars of Western Europe at the beginning of the 19th century. Before this time, there were few reliable references to ‘David’ in Western European research literature. It was the orientalist Carl Friedrich Neumann (1798–1870) who brought about the turnaround. He studied in Heidelberg with Creuzer and Hegel, learned the Armenian language from the Mechitarists in Venice, and found inspiration in Paris. Then he examined the available Armenian and Greek sources of the Corpus Davidis and collected his findings in a monograph in 1829. Neumann’s deeply philosophical mind is clearly revealed in this treatise, entitled Mémoire sur la vie et les ouvrages de David. With great certitude, he traced down the pieces of information from David’s writings, as well as from the related ancient Armenian sources, which had great relevance for further research. These findings included communications on the biography of David and his own works, as well as on Aristotle, late antique Aristotelianism and Neoplatonism. Almost inevitably, Neumann also fell victim to errors, which, however, does not diminish his importance as a pioneer of research into late antique Armenian philosophy. Neumann put David on the map for Western scholars, thus prompting a wider interest in the hitherto isolated Armenian philosophical thought for the first time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信