{"title":"‚David Armenius philosophus‘","authors":"Udo Reinhold Jeck","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.00023.JEC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nAt the centre of the philosophical tradition of Armenia is a thinker who in the Western tradition carries the\nLatin names ‘David Armenius philosophus’ or ‘David invincibilis’. Today, international philosophical-historical research is\nincreasingly concerned with the enigmatic corpus of the works that have been handed down under the name of David. The\nhistorical-critical exploration of early Armenian philosophy and its specific achievements, as well as its intense relationship to\nlate antique Byzantine thought, were, however, initiated by important scholars of Western Europe at the beginning of the 19th\ncentury. Before this time, there were few reliable references to ‘David’ in Western European research literature. It was the\norientalist Carl Friedrich Neumann (1798–1870) who brought about the turnaround. He studied in Heidelberg with Creuzer and Hegel,\nlearned the Armenian language from the Mechitarists in Venice, and found inspiration in Paris. Then he examined the available\nArmenian and Greek sources of the Corpus Davidis and collected his findings in a monograph in 1829. Neumann’s deeply philosophical\nmind is clearly revealed in this treatise, entitled Mémoire sur la vie et les ouvrages de David. With great certitude, he\ntraced down the pieces of information from David’s writings, as well as from the related ancient Armenian sources, which had great\nrelevance for further research. These findings included communications on the biography of David and his own works, as well as on\nAristotle, late antique Aristotelianism and Neoplatonism. Almost inevitably, Neumann also fell victim to errors, which, however,\ndoes not diminish his importance as a pioneer of research into late antique Armenian philosophy. Neumann put David on the map for\nWestern scholars, thus prompting a wider interest in the hitherto isolated Armenian philosophical thought for the first time.","PeriodicalId":165187,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.00023.JEC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
At the centre of the philosophical tradition of Armenia is a thinker who in the Western tradition carries the
Latin names ‘David Armenius philosophus’ or ‘David invincibilis’. Today, international philosophical-historical research is
increasingly concerned with the enigmatic corpus of the works that have been handed down under the name of David. The
historical-critical exploration of early Armenian philosophy and its specific achievements, as well as its intense relationship to
late antique Byzantine thought, were, however, initiated by important scholars of Western Europe at the beginning of the 19th
century. Before this time, there were few reliable references to ‘David’ in Western European research literature. It was the
orientalist Carl Friedrich Neumann (1798–1870) who brought about the turnaround. He studied in Heidelberg with Creuzer and Hegel,
learned the Armenian language from the Mechitarists in Venice, and found inspiration in Paris. Then he examined the available
Armenian and Greek sources of the Corpus Davidis and collected his findings in a monograph in 1829. Neumann’s deeply philosophical
mind is clearly revealed in this treatise, entitled Mémoire sur la vie et les ouvrages de David. With great certitude, he
traced down the pieces of information from David’s writings, as well as from the related ancient Armenian sources, which had great
relevance for further research. These findings included communications on the biography of David and his own works, as well as on
Aristotle, late antique Aristotelianism and Neoplatonism. Almost inevitably, Neumann also fell victim to errors, which, however,
does not diminish his importance as a pioneer of research into late antique Armenian philosophy. Neumann put David on the map for
Western scholars, thus prompting a wider interest in the hitherto isolated Armenian philosophical thought for the first time.