Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome最新文献

Ciceronian Constructions of the Oratorical Past 西塞罗式的过去演讲结构

Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome Pub Date : 2018-12-15 DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_011

H. V. D. Blom

引用次数: 0

Memoria by Multiplication: The Cornelii Scipiones in Monumental Memory 乘法记忆:不朽记忆中的科涅利西皮翁

Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome Pub Date : 2018-12-15 DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_019

Karl-Joachim Hölkeskamp

引用次数: 1

Monumenta, Documenta, Memoria: Remembering and Imagining the Past in Late Republican Rome 纪念碑、文献展、记忆:罗马共和晚期的回忆与想象

Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome Pub Date : 2018-12-15 DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_016

K. Sandberg

引用次数: 4

On the Edges of History 在历史的边缘

Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome Pub Date : 2018-12-15 DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_006

Christopher Smith

引用次数: 0

Inspired Leaders versus Emerging Nations: Varro’s and Cicero’s Views on Early Rome 灵感领袖与新兴国家:瓦罗和西塞罗对早期罗马的看法

Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome Pub Date : 2018-12-15 DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_008

Vera Binder

{"title":"Inspired Leaders versus Emerging Nations: Varro’s and Cicero’s Views on Early Rome","authors":"Vera Binder","doi":"10.1163/9789004355552_008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355552_008","url":null,"abstract":"Cicero and Varro were not the closest of friends. We know of only comparatively few letters of Cicero’s addressed to Varro, and we remember how embarrassing a task it proved for Cicero to dedicate one of his works to the Reatine polymath.1 Scholars have always wondered why their relationship was not a particularly intimate one, and in fact rather the opposite. Both were born from regional elites and had to work their way through the Roman cursus honorum (Varro stopped after having reached the praetorship); both joined Pompey’s side in the Civil War and, later on, fell victim to the proscriptions which only Varro was lucky enough to survive. They had close friends in common, most conspicuously Pomponius Atticus; both were interested in philosophy and in research on the Roman past, illustrious protagonists in the process of rationalization Claudia Moatti has described so impressively in her magisterial book La raison de Rome;2 both were deeply worried about imminent loss of tradition.3 So we might imagine that their similar biographical backgrounds, similar interests and similar conservative anxieties should have provided more than enough common ground, but what we encounter from Cicero’s part amounts to nothing more than distant politeness and a less than enthusiastic and sometimes rather grudging acknowledgement of Varro’s merits. To try to explain what may have prevented them from becoming close friends would amount to indulging in psychological speculation; what will be attempted here is rather to take a closer look at what has been labeled their ‘conservativism’ or, to put it in a more neutral way, their perspective on the","PeriodicalId":164486,"journal":{"name":"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124634018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Aedificare, res damnosissima. Building and Historiography in Livy, Books 5–6 建筑，就是damnosissima。李维的建筑与史学，第5-6卷

Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome Pub Date : 2018-12-15 DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_018

Seth Bernard

引用次数: 0

Fabius Pictor, Ennius and the Origins of Roman Annalistic Historiography 法比尤斯·皮克托:《恩尼乌斯与罗马编年史的起源》

Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome Pub Date : 2018-12-15 DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_003

J. Rich

{"title":"Fabius Pictor, Ennius and the Origins of Roman Annalistic Historiography","authors":"J. Rich","doi":"10.1163/9789004355552_003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355552_003","url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers when and how annalistic organization by the consular year came to be established in the Roman historiographical tradition. It argues that Fabius Pictor gave a year-by-year account of events from at least the early third century bc, but narrated only selected years in the early Republic, that Ennius followed this example, and that Piso was the first Roman historian to provide a narrative organized by magistrate years for the whole of the Republic. The annual record kept by the pontifex maximus will have been used as a source by Fabius and perhaps some of his successors, but did not play the dominant part in shaping the character of Roman historical writing with which it has often been credited. The term annales was invented by Ennius as the title for his epic, and then taken over as their title by Piso and some of his successors. It thus became established as a designation for a history of Rome organized by magistrate years, and so came to be applied by extension also to the Pontifex Maximus’ record, under the distinctive title of Annales maximi. These conclusions have important implications both for the credibility of early Roman history and for the character of Roman historical writing.","PeriodicalId":164486,"journal":{"name":"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133071330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Which One is the Historian? A Neglected Problem in the Study of Roman Historiography 哪一个是历史学家?罗马史学研究中一个被忽视的问题

Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome Pub Date : 2018-12-15 DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_009

T. Cornell

{"title":"Which One is the Historian? A Neglected Problem in the Study of Roman Historiography","authors":"T. Cornell","doi":"10.1163/9789004355552_009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355552_009","url":null,"abstract":"Many of the Roman historians whose works survive only in fragments were well-known persons whose lives and careers are fully documented.1 They include such major public figures as Cato the Elder, the dictator Sulla, and the emperor Augustus,2 and famous men of letters such as Cicero, Varro, and Cornelius Nepos.3 For these men the writing of history or autobiography was merely one aspect of their many and multifarious activities. The same is true of other less prominent but nonetheless significant men who added the composition of historical works to their distinguished public achievements – men such as L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi (cos. 133 BCE), P. Rutilius Rufus (cos. 105), and L. Cornelius Sisenna (pr. 78).4 At the other extreme are those who are known solely as historians, and are only quoted or referred to as such in our sources. Of their lives and careers we know little or nothing. The historians in this group include L. Cassius Hemina, Cn. Gellius, L. Coelius Antipater, and Q. Claudius Quadrigarius,5 as well as others for whom we do not even have a praenomen: Vennonius, Sempronius Asellio and Valerius Antias.6 As for Fenestella (FRHist 70), who lived in the time of Augustus, we know only his cognomen. But between these two extremes there is a large group of historians whose identity is uncertain. The level of uncertainty differs in each case. At one end of the spectrum we find historians such as L. Cincius Alimentus (FRHist 2), who is almost certainly to be identified with the man of that name who held the praetorship in 210 BCE (Liv. 26.23.1) and appears several times in Livy’s narrative of","PeriodicalId":164486,"journal":{"name":"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131347690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Cicero, Documents and the Implications for History 西塞罗:《文献及其对历史的影响》

Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome Pub Date : 2018-12-15 DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_012

A. Riggsby

引用次数: 1

Visibility Matters. Notes on Archaic Monuments and Collective Memory in Mid-Republican Rome 可见性问题。罗马共和中期的古代纪念碑和集体记忆注释

Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome Pub Date : 2018-12-15 DOI: 10.1163/9789004355552_017

G. Cifani

引用次数: 3