西塞罗:《文献及其对历史的影响》

A. Riggsby
{"title":"西塞罗:《文献及其对历史的影响》","authors":"A. Riggsby","doi":"10.1163/9789004355552_012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cicero’s speeches provide numerous models of how documents could be interpreted publicly (and thus accountably) to reach conclusions about the past. The available means are diverse and powerful, and they allow a motivated interpreter considerable opportunity to reach any expected or desired conclusion. There is reason to believe that similar strategies would have been used in historical contexts and thus that use of documentary evidence might have constrained Roman historians less than has sometimes been imagined.","PeriodicalId":164486,"journal":{"name":"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome","volume":"1150 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cicero, Documents and the Implications for History\",\"authors\":\"A. Riggsby\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004355552_012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cicero’s speeches provide numerous models of how documents could be interpreted publicly (and thus accountably) to reach conclusions about the past. The available means are diverse and powerful, and they allow a motivated interpreter considerable opportunity to reach any expected or desired conclusion. There is reason to believe that similar strategies would have been used in historical contexts and thus that use of documentary evidence might have constrained Roman historians less than has sometimes been imagined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome\",\"volume\":\"1150 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355552_012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355552_012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

西塞罗的演讲提供了许多模型,说明文件如何被公开解释(因此是负责任的),从而得出关于过去的结论。可用的方法是多种多样和强大的,它们使一个有动机的口译员有相当大的机会得出任何预期或期望的结论。有理由相信,在历史背景下也会使用类似的策略,因此,文献证据的使用对罗马历史学家的限制可能没有人们有时想象的那么大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cicero, Documents and the Implications for History
Cicero’s speeches provide numerous models of how documents could be interpreted publicly (and thus accountably) to reach conclusions about the past. The available means are diverse and powerful, and they allow a motivated interpreter considerable opportunity to reach any expected or desired conclusion. There is reason to believe that similar strategies would have been used in historical contexts and thus that use of documentary evidence might have constrained Roman historians less than has sometimes been imagined.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信