Brazilian Political Science Review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Affirmative Action Attitudes of Whites: Evidence from a List Experiment Survey in Brazil 白人对平权行动的态度:来自巴西清单实验调查的证据
Brazilian Political Science Review Pub Date : 2018-05-01 DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201800020003
Robert Vidigal
{"title":"Affirmative Action Attitudes of Whites: Evidence from a List Experiment Survey in Brazil","authors":"Robert Vidigal","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201800020003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800020003","url":null,"abstract":"Recently in Brazil, public policies have begun to be implemented to reduce discrimination and promote the inclusion of excluded social groups based on a specific individual characteristic: race. However, there is little public consensus about such policies, especially among whites. In this work, I look at the racial attitudes towards affirmative action among white college students. I make use of new research methods for the empirical study of socially sensitive issues and ask whether these attitudes stem from prejudice, conflicts between social groups or individual political predispositions. Furthermore, I ask what is the relationship between political knowledge and such racial attitudes. I use the list experiment method because of its potential to offset the under-representation of opinions and attitudes. This approach allows respondents to be indirectly questioned, ensuring greater sincerity in their answers and, hence, providing more accurate portrayal of attitudes. This study shows that white respondents’ answers on affirmative action policies are strongly affected by social desirability. Only 6% of white respondents agreed that it is important to have a quota policy for blacks at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC). Individuals with greater political knowledge tend to express greater support for affirmative action and hold more coherent racial attitudes Results also reveal that negative racial attitudes and political predispositions are both determinants of the white student’s attitudes towards affirmative action policies.","PeriodicalId":159271,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Political Science Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128208521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Freedom through form: Bolívar Lamounier and the Liberal Interpretation of Brazilian Political Thought* 形式的自由:Bolívar拉蒙尼尔与巴西政治思想的自由主义解读*
Brazilian Political Science Review Pub Date : 2018-05-01 DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201800020002
C. Lynch, Paulo Henrique Paschoeto Cassimiro
{"title":"Freedom through form: Bolívar Lamounier and the Liberal Interpretation of Brazilian Political Thought*","authors":"C. Lynch, Paulo Henrique Paschoeto Cassimiro","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201800020002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800020002","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the contribution of Bolivar Lamounier to Brazilian political thought. Our main argument is that, by replacing nationality with freedom as the defining criterion of the real, Bolivar Lamounier offers a liberal interpretation of Brazilian political thought, in direct contrast to the nationalist tradition formulated by Oliveira Vianna. In this view, it is the liberals who are the realists, while nationalists and Marxists are idealists. As we shall see, this interpretation is normatively committed to one side, that [...]","PeriodicalId":159271,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Political Science Review","volume":"520 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123571685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Representation, Epistemic Democracy, and Political Parties in John Stuart Mill and José De Alencar * 约翰·斯图亚特·密尔和约瑟·德·阿朗卡的《代表、认知民主和政党》*
Brazilian Political Science Review Pub Date : 2018-04-25 DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201800020004
Gustavo H. Dalaqua
{"title":"Representation, Epistemic Democracy, and Political Parties in John Stuart Mill and José De Alencar *","authors":"Gustavo H. Dalaqua","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201800020004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800020004","url":null,"abstract":"John Stuart Mill and Jose de Alencar lived at the same time and wrote about the same issues, and yet the connections between their political theories remain unexplored. Seeking to offer a comparison of both theories, this article argues that reading Mill’s “Considerations on Representative Government” (1977b) vis-a-vis Alencar’s “Systema representativo” (1868) brings to the fore two aspects of Mill’s political theory that Mill scholars usually overlook: 01. political representation is endowed with constructivist power; 02. epistemic democracy and agonistic [...]","PeriodicalId":159271,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Political Science Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132661983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Diplomacy as an Independent Variable 外交作为一个自变量
Brazilian Political Science Review Pub Date : 2018-04-25 DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201800020008
Dawisson Belém Lopes
{"title":"Diplomacy as an Independent Variable","authors":"Dawisson Belém Lopes","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201800020008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800020008","url":null,"abstract":"A few years ago, I was commissioned by a Dutch publisher to compose a short biography of Rubens Ricupero for an editorial project on former secretaries-general of international organizations (). This offered me the chance to interview this scholarly, polite, and sober character with an impressive career within both domestic and global bureaucracies. It is difficult not to be charmed by his personality. Therefore, like Homer’s Ulysses, I confess I had to tie myself to the mast so as not [...]","PeriodicalId":159271,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Political Science Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129882647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strategic Coalitions and Agenda-Setting in Fragmented Congresses: How the PRI Sets the Legislative Agenda in Mexico 分散的国会中的战略联盟和议程设置:革命制度党如何在墨西哥设定立法议程
Brazilian Political Science Review Pub Date : 2018-04-25 DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201800020001
Robert d. Knight
{"title":"Strategic Coalitions and Agenda-Setting in Fragmented Congresses: How the PRI Sets the Legislative Agenda in Mexico","authors":"Robert d. Knight","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201800020001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800020001","url":null,"abstract":"This essay suggests a theory of strategic legislative agenda control. It argues that a single party can effectively set the agenda under majoritarian gatekeeping rules without obtaining majority or even plurality status. The agenda-setting party need not be the median party in the assembly nor supported by executive-led parliamentary coalitions. The Mexican Chamber of Deputies provides a case study of how majoritarian gatekeeping and political context establish the conditions necessary for one-party-led agenda-setting in a fragmented congress with or without [...]","PeriodicalId":159271,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Political Science Review","volume":"404 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132574537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Post-Western World 后的世界
Brazilian Political Science Review Pub Date : 2018-02-21 DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201800010008
A. Rinaldi
{"title":"Post-Western World","authors":"A. Rinaldi","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201800010008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800010008","url":null,"abstract":"The contemporary world order is under intense scrutiny from observers, specialists, and researchers of the subject. Since the 2000s, a period that witnessed the emergence of developing countries onto the international scene, we have been seeing a growing interest in the study of the relations between the traditional powers and rising powers, as well as their effects on the global system. Such an interest can be illustrated by the recent publishing of impactful work such as , , , and [...]","PeriodicalId":159271,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Political Science Review","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122593650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Expert-Driven and Citational Approaches to Assessing Journal Publications of Brazilian Political Scientists 专家驱动和引文方法评估巴西政治科学家的期刊出版物
Brazilian Political Science Review Pub Date : 2018-02-21 DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201800010004
L. Barberia, Danilo Praxedes Barboza, Samuel Ralize de Godoy
{"title":"Expert-Driven and Citational Approaches to Assessing Journal Publications of Brazilian Political Scientists","authors":"L. Barberia, Danilo Praxedes Barboza, Samuel Ralize de Godoy","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201800010004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800010004","url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we seek to contribute to discussions on how the quality of academic production in the field of political science should be evaluated using Brazil as a case study. We contrast the ‘expert-driven approach’ that is followed by CAPES, an agency of the Brazilian federal government with the ‘citational’ approach, which is based on the ranking of journals by mainstream indices of scientific research impact. With data provided by CAPES from 2010 to 2014, we examine to what [...]","PeriodicalId":159271,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Political Science Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132487964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Brazil on the Global Stage 国际舞台上的巴西
Brazilian Political Science Review Pub Date : 2017-11-28 DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201700030008
M. Klein
{"title":"Brazil on the Global Stage","authors":"M. Klein","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201700030008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201700030008","url":null,"abstract":"Edited by Oliver Stuenkel and Matthew M. Taylor, ‘Brazil on the Global Stage’ brings together the reflections of researchers from Brazilian and American institutions about Brazil’s engagement with the current liberal order. In the book, the liberal global order is defined by “open markets, international institutions, cooperative security, democratic community, collective problem solving, shared sovereignty over some issues, and the rule of law” (STUENKEL and TAYLOR, 2015, p. 06), all of which follows the common understanding of liberal internationalists such [...]","PeriodicalId":159271,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Political Science Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116494657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Representatives of whom 谁的代表
Brazilian Political Science Review Pub Date : 2017-11-07 DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201700030006
C. M. C. Filho
{"title":"Representatives of whom","authors":"C. M. C. Filho","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201700030006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201700030006","url":null,"abstract":"In the midst of one of the worst political crises in Brazilian history, UFRJ Professor Jairo Nicolau's book, \"Representantes de quem?: os (des)caminhos do seu voto da urna a Câmara dos Deputados\" (Representatives of whom? The (un-)path of your vote at the polls to the Chamber of Deputies) comes at a timely moment. Written in accessible language and free of excessive jargon, the book seeks to show how our electoral system functions to a broader public, beyond the walls of academia, by tracing the path from a vote at the ballot box to the distribution of seats in the Chamber of Deputies.","PeriodicalId":159271,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Political Science Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121273691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Coalition Presidentialism in Bicameral Congresses: How does the Control of a Bicameral Majority Affect Coalition Survival? 两院制议会中的联合总统制:两院制多数的控制如何影响联盟的生存?
Brazilian Political Science Review Pub Date : 2017-09-18 DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201700020002
Adrián Albala
{"title":"Coalition Presidentialism in Bicameral Congresses: How does the Control of a Bicameral Majority Affect Coalition Survival?","authors":"Adrián Albala","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201700020002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201700020002","url":null,"abstract":"Presidential legislative majorities under bicameral congresses have seldom been considered in the literature on coalition cabinets. However, this combination is far from being an isolated or irrelevant topic. Bicameral congresses comprise a double round of negotiation for the executive, increasing the shadow of the unexpected. Indeed, controlling one of the two chambers may not be sufficient for a president to guarantee the approval of policies. In this case, what if a government does not control both houses? How are coalition cabinets affected by the non-control of one or both chambers? I will focus analysis on the 25 cases of coalition cabinets in Latin America since the return of democracy and present a bicameral framework. Through mvQCA, I find that, contrary to common belief, the controlling of a bicameral majority is neither necessary nor sufficient to ensure stable coalitions.","PeriodicalId":159271,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Political Science Review","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117124995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信