约翰·斯图亚特·密尔和约瑟·德·阿朗卡的《代表、认知民主和政党》*

Gustavo H. Dalaqua
{"title":"约翰·斯图亚特·密尔和约瑟·德·阿朗卡的《代表、认知民主和政党》*","authors":"Gustavo H. Dalaqua","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201800020004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"John Stuart Mill and Jose de Alencar lived at the same time and wrote about the same issues, and yet the connections between their political theories remain unexplored. Seeking to offer a comparison of both theories, this article argues that reading Mill’s “Considerations on Representative Government” (1977b) vis-a-vis Alencar’s “Systema representativo” (1868) brings to the fore two aspects of Mill’s political theory that Mill scholars usually overlook: 01. political representation is endowed with constructivist power; 02. epistemic democracy and agonistic [...]","PeriodicalId":159271,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Political Science Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representation, Epistemic Democracy, and Political Parties in John Stuart Mill and José De Alencar *\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo H. Dalaqua\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1981-3821201800020004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"John Stuart Mill and Jose de Alencar lived at the same time and wrote about the same issues, and yet the connections between their political theories remain unexplored. Seeking to offer a comparison of both theories, this article argues that reading Mill’s “Considerations on Representative Government” (1977b) vis-a-vis Alencar’s “Systema representativo” (1868) brings to the fore two aspects of Mill’s political theory that Mill scholars usually overlook: 01. political representation is endowed with constructivist power; 02. epistemic democracy and agonistic [...]\",\"PeriodicalId\":159271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Political Science Review\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Political Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800020004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800020004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

约翰·斯图亚特·密尔和何塞·德·阿伦卡尔生活在同一时代,写的是同样的问题,但他们的政治理论之间的联系仍未被探索。为了对这两种理论进行比较,本文认为,阅读密尔的《代议制政府的思考》(1977b)和艾伦卡尔的《代表制度》(1868),可以突出密尔政治理论中密尔学者通常忽略的两个方面:政治代表被赋予建构主义权力;02. 认识民主与竞争[…]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Representation, Epistemic Democracy, and Political Parties in John Stuart Mill and José De Alencar *
John Stuart Mill and Jose de Alencar lived at the same time and wrote about the same issues, and yet the connections between their political theories remain unexplored. Seeking to offer a comparison of both theories, this article argues that reading Mill’s “Considerations on Representative Government” (1977b) vis-a-vis Alencar’s “Systema representativo” (1868) brings to the fore two aspects of Mill’s political theory that Mill scholars usually overlook: 01. political representation is endowed with constructivist power; 02. epistemic democracy and agonistic [...]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信