Risalah Hukum最新文献

Perbedaan Penerapan Pendekaran Per se Illegal dan Rule of Reason dalam Putusan KPPU tentang Kartel Penetapan Harga 在KPPU关于定价的裁决中，非法隐藏的法律和理性的规则存在差异

Risalah Hukum Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i1.753

Dimas Aryadiputra, Deny Slamet Pribadi, Aryo Subroto

{"title":"Perbedaan Penerapan Pendekaran Per se Illegal dan Rule of Reason dalam Putusan KPPU tentang Kartel Penetapan Harga","authors":"Dimas Aryadiputra, Deny Slamet Pribadi, Aryo Subroto","doi":"10.30872/risalah.v18i1.753","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v18i1.753","url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of an economic impact analysis in the decision of the price fixing cartel case in Article 5 of the UULPM which should use the approach in that article is Per se Illegal, including Decision No. 08/KPPU-L/2018, Decision No. 04/KPPI-I/2016, Decision No. 32/KPPU-L/2008, Decision No. 26/KPPU-L/2007, and Decision No. 02/KPPU-I/2003 by analyzing the use of a single Per se Illegal approach in the decision of the price fixing cartel case in ensuring legal certainty. The approach in this study uses doctrinal research. From the results of the analysis of the decision related to the price fixing cartel in the consideration of the commission assembly, it has been found in the form of economic evidence/economic analysis which is a characteristic of the Rule of Reason approach to the reasons for the emergence of the economic analysis not being explained explicitly and clearly by the commission assembly, regarding the assessment that can be made. carried out by the KPPU regarding the agreement in Article 5 of the UULPM, economic evidence may appear if the requirement to prove the agreement is difficult to find. Legal considerations using the Per se Illegal approach as the sole approach in the KPPU's decision related to price fixing cartels in ensuring legal certainty, this has been in line with what is positively regulated in Article 5 of the UULPM wherein the provision contains the phrase \"prohibited\" on behavior and the resulting impact. must be wrong or illegal so that it does not need further analysis. \u0000Keywords: per se illegal; rule of reason; price fixing cartel","PeriodicalId":153232,"journal":{"name":"Risalah Hukum","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122326193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Analisis Yuridis Tingkat Kepatuhan Membayar Pajak Masyarakat Indonesia 分析法律界纳税等级印尼

Risalah Hukum Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i1.650

Gerald Samuel

引用次数: 0

Kapasitas Pemerintahan Afghanistan Rezim Taliban Baru sebagai Peserta dalam Perjanjian Internasional 新的塔利班政权作为国际条约的缔约国，能够在阿富汗发挥作用

Risalah Hukum Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i1.818

Miko Aditiya Suharto, Maria Novita Apriyani

{"title":"Kapasitas Pemerintahan Afghanistan Rezim Taliban Baru sebagai Peserta dalam Perjanjian Internasional","authors":"Miko Aditiya Suharto, Maria Novita Apriyani","doi":"10.30872/risalah.v18i1.818","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v18i1.818","url":null,"abstract":"The decision by the United States and NATO to withdraw troops from Afghanistan is a golden opportunity for the ultraconservative political factions (Taliban) to take back their control of Afghanistan. This military invasion by the United States and NATO has caused a humanitarian tragedy and an extraordinary humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan since 2001 ago. The Taliban took control of the government in Afghanistan after the United States and NATO withdrew their troops from Chief Ashraf Ghani. This article is a legal scientific article that has been normatively researched, the approaches used in writing this article include the statutory approach and case studies (not a case approach). This article discusses the legitimacy of the occupation of the Afghan government by the Taliban regime, as well as the legal consequences that arise from international agreements that have been made and run from the previous government regime. Conclusion This Scientific Article states that the Status of the Government of Afghanistan by the Taliban is a Succession of Government and is legal under international law and the impact of this succession makes the current Regime Government a Successor of the previous government, so that the Rights & Obligations of the existing International Agreements remain binding on the State of Afghanistan even though it has been change government regime. \u0000Keywords: succession, taliban regime, afghanistan, international law","PeriodicalId":153232,"journal":{"name":"Risalah Hukum","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134191682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Peraturan Pemeliharaan Anak dalam Hukum Adat Bali Akibat Perceraian Putusan No.36/Pdt.G/2016/Pn.Ng 《巴厘岛刑法》中关于离婚的《孩子维护条例》判决第36条/Pdt G/2016年/限制》

Risalah Hukum Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i1.806

Lisa Aprilia Gusreyna, Siti Kotijah

引用次数: 0

Pemisahan Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Serentak Tingkat Nasional dan Daerah 国家和地区同时举行选举的分层

Risalah Hukum Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i1.586

Sri Asriana, Rosmini, Ine Ventyrina

{"title":"Pemisahan Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Serentak Tingkat Nasional dan Daerah","authors":"Sri Asriana, Rosmini, Ine Ventyrina","doi":"10.30872/risalah.v18i1.586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v18i1.586","url":null,"abstract":"General election regulations simultaneously raise problems at the level of implementation, because they are considered not to show effectiveness and efficiency in the implementation of general elections in accordance with the purpose of the establishment of these regulations. Therefore, the implementation of the general election regulations simultaneously needs to be reviewed based on the initial objective of issuing the Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 concerning Simultaneous General Elections, and refers to the implementation of simultaneous general elections in 2019. The research method used in This research is doctrinal, which contains a normative character. There are implications for the implementation of simultaneous elections, it is necessary to construct a law to separate general elections simultaneously at the national and regional levels in 2024 with the implementation of two elections within five years, making it easier for voters to cast their votes, easing the burden on organizers, and optimizing the campaigns of political parties and candidates in the regions. The results of the national elections strengthen the presidential system at the national level, while the results of the regional elections will strengthen local government. \u0000Keywords: Election, Simultaneous, Formulation \u0000 \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":153232,"journal":{"name":"Risalah Hukum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117299550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Tindakan Amerika Serikat Dalam Menarik Diri Dari Paris Agreement Dalam Kerangka Hukum Internasional 美国从巴黎撤军的行动构成了国际法的框架

Risalah Hukum Pub Date : 2022-04-08 DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.158

Mush'ab Al Ma'ruf, Mahendra Putra Kurnia, Syukri Hidayatullah

引用次数: 3

Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Tambahan Kebiri Kimia Ditinjau dari Perspektif Keadilan 从正义的角度来看，对化学实行额外刑罚是阉割

Risalah Hukum Pub Date : 2022-04-08 DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.203

Adella Aldionita Chairi, Ivan Zairani Lisi, Rini Apriyani

引用次数: 0

Efektifitas Pengelolaan Retribusi Pasar Sebagai Sumber Pendapatan Asli Daerah Dan Upaya Penanggulangan Penyimpangan 市场报复管理作为该地区的原始收入来源和反腐败努力的有效性

Risalah Hukum Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v17i2.707

F. Simangunsong, Hervina Puspitosari

{"title":"Efektifitas Pengelolaan Retribusi Pasar Sebagai Sumber Pendapatan Asli Daerah Dan Upaya Penanggulangan Penyimpangan","authors":"F. Simangunsong, Hervina Puspitosari","doi":"10.30872/risalah.v17i2.707","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v17i2.707","url":null,"abstract":"Developments organized by these regions are regional in nature, as a realization of development planning in accordance with development priorities at the regional level as part of the implementation of autonomous government decentralization. In order to support the implementation of economic development goals in the regions, local governments are required to have the ability to meet the needs of these regional expenditures, namely by optimizing local revenue (PAD). is the establishment of a retribution policy through an accountable collection system with the use of information technology so that it is easily controlled and supervised by all parties and transparent that can be accountable to the public through the application of a book system that can be monitored by all parties, providing strict sanctions in accordance with the laws and regulations. applicable regulations as well as applicable regional regulations related to taxes and levies in order to provide a deterrent effect for those who abuse their authority. The need for supervision of officers in the field. Local governments that do not yet have electronic-based retribution services need to immediately prepare electronic services in collecting market retributions through e levies in the context of efficient, transparent and accountable management of market retributions. Increased supervision of the Regional Government in the management of user fees so that it is optimal in providing income for Regional Original Income and the realization of a prosperous society and good governance \u0000Keywords: market levy, locally-generated income, deviation countermeasures","PeriodicalId":153232,"journal":{"name":"Risalah Hukum","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126062250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Sanksi Kepada Amerika Serikat Atas Tindakan Unilateralnya Terhadap Suriah Dengan Alasan Penggunaan Senjata Kimia 对美国以使用化学武器为由对叙利亚采取的单方面行动的惩罚

Risalah Hukum Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v17i2.155

Mutiara, Mahendra Putra Kurnia, Rika Erawaty

{"title":"Sanksi Kepada Amerika Serikat Atas Tindakan Unilateralnya Terhadap Suriah Dengan Alasan Penggunaan Senjata Kimia","authors":"Mutiara, Mahendra Putra Kurnia, Rika Erawaty","doi":"10.30872/risalah.v17i2.155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v17i2.155","url":null,"abstract":"Amerika Serikat, Inggris dan juga Perancis melakukan tindakan unilateral berupa menembakkan rudal ke negara Suriah dengan alasan penggunaan senjata kimia yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah Suriah terhadap rakyatnya sendiri. Hal ini menimbulkan pertanyaan apakah tindakan yang dilakukan oleh Amerika Serikat tersebut merupakan suatu pelanggaran bagi hukum humaniter internasional dan bagaimana sanksi yang akan didapat oleh Amerika Serikat, Inggris dan juga Perancis jika perbuatan tersebut telah melanggar hukum humaniter internasional. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan bahwa Sanksi Amerika Serikat atas tindakan unilateralnya terhadap Suriah dengan alasan penggunaan senjata kimia. Bahwa dalam hal tersebut Amerika Serikat melakukan tindakan sepihak kepada Suriah karna dugaan penggunaan senjata kimia yang dilakukan oleh Suriah yang hingga saat ini masih belum mendapatkan bukti yang kuat terkait kebenaran tersebut. Oleh karena itu Amerika Serikat telah melanggar ketentuan hukum internasional yaitu Piagam Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (PBB), atas perbuatannya Amerika Serikat, Inggris dan Perancis harus bertanggungjawab sesuai prosedur dari Dewan Keamanan PBB dan diberikan sanksi sesuai Piagam PBB. \u0000Keywords: unilateral action, chemical weapon, international law","PeriodicalId":153232,"journal":{"name":"Risalah Hukum","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124558076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Perbandingan Konstitusional Pengaturan Impeachment Presiden Antara Indonesia Dengan Jerman

Risalah Hukum Pub Date : 2021-12-30 DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i2.600

Adella Anindia, Rosmini, Poppilea Erwinta

{"title":"Perbandingan Konstitusional Pengaturan Impeachment Presiden Antara Indonesia Dengan Jerman","authors":"Adella Anindia, Rosmini, Poppilea Erwinta","doi":"10.30872/risalah.v18i2.600","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v18i2.600","url":null,"abstract":"The impeachment system in Germany is implemented slightly differently from that applied in Indonesia. The impeachment system in Germany is executed by the Constitutional Court whose decision is final, which means that it does not receive a 2/3 proposal from the Bundestag and the Bundestraat regarding the dismissal of the President and Vice President as in Indonesia. The regulation of the impeachment system in a country needs to be studied by involving a comparison country to find out whether the impeachment system in a country runs optimally and ideally. Comparison of Impeachment between Indonesia and Germany, The mechanism for dismissing the president as regulated in the constitution is an affirmation that the Republic of Indonesia is a state of law, this is a step forward in a constitutional perspective so that impeachment of the president based on non-juridical factors alone does not happen again in the future. dismissal of the president as regulated in the 1945 Constitution, because in the impeachment mechanism, the decision of the Constitutional Court confirming the opinion of the DPR is not binding. \u0000Keywords: president impeachment; constitutional law; comparative law.","PeriodicalId":153232,"journal":{"name":"Risalah Hukum","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129943221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0