Perbandingan Konstitusional Pengaturan Impeachment Presiden Antara Indonesia Dengan Jerman

Adella Anindia, Rosmini, Poppilea Erwinta
{"title":"Perbandingan Konstitusional Pengaturan Impeachment Presiden Antara Indonesia Dengan Jerman","authors":"Adella Anindia, Rosmini, Poppilea Erwinta","doi":"10.30872/risalah.v18i2.600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impeachment system in Germany is implemented slightly differently from that applied in Indonesia. The impeachment system in Germany is executed by the Constitutional Court whose decision is final, which means that it does not receive a 2/3 proposal from the Bundestag and the Bundestraat regarding the dismissal of the President and Vice President as in Indonesia. The regulation of the impeachment system in a country needs to be studied by involving a comparison country to find out whether the impeachment system in a country runs optimally and ideally. Comparison of Impeachment between Indonesia and Germany, The mechanism for dismissing the president as regulated in the constitution is an affirmation that the Republic of Indonesia is a state of law, this is a step forward in a constitutional perspective so that impeachment of the president based on non-juridical factors alone does not happen again in the future. dismissal of the president as regulated in the 1945 Constitution, because in the impeachment mechanism, the decision of the Constitutional Court confirming the opinion of the DPR is not binding. \nKeywords: president impeachment; constitutional law; comparative law.","PeriodicalId":153232,"journal":{"name":"Risalah Hukum","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risalah Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v18i2.600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impeachment system in Germany is implemented slightly differently from that applied in Indonesia. The impeachment system in Germany is executed by the Constitutional Court whose decision is final, which means that it does not receive a 2/3 proposal from the Bundestag and the Bundestraat regarding the dismissal of the President and Vice President as in Indonesia. The regulation of the impeachment system in a country needs to be studied by involving a comparison country to find out whether the impeachment system in a country runs optimally and ideally. Comparison of Impeachment between Indonesia and Germany, The mechanism for dismissing the president as regulated in the constitution is an affirmation that the Republic of Indonesia is a state of law, this is a step forward in a constitutional perspective so that impeachment of the president based on non-juridical factors alone does not happen again in the future. dismissal of the president as regulated in the 1945 Constitution, because in the impeachment mechanism, the decision of the Constitutional Court confirming the opinion of the DPR is not binding. Keywords: president impeachment; constitutional law; comparative law.
德国的弹劾制度与印度尼西亚的略有不同。德国的弹劾制度是由宪法法院执行的,宪法法院的决定是最终的,这意味着它不会像印度尼西亚那样收到联邦议院和联邦议院三分之二的提议,就总统和副总统的罢免。一个国家的弹劾制度规制需要通过比较国的参与来研究,以确定一个国家的弹劾制度是否运行得最优、最理想。印度尼西亚与德国的弹劾比较:宪法规定的罢免总统的机制是对印度尼西亚共和国是一个法治国家的肯定,这是从宪法的角度迈出的一步,以便今后不再发生仅基于非司法因素的总统弹劾。按照1945年宪法的规定罢免总统,因为在弹劾机制中,宪法法院确认DPR意见的决定不具有约束力。关键词:总统弹劾;宪法;比较法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信