Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter最新文献_第7页

Stoicism and Byzantine philosophy: Proairesis in Epictetus and Nicephorus Blemmydes 斯多葛主义与拜占庭哲学:爱比克泰德与尼塞弗鲁斯·布莱米得斯的自我保护主义

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.17.04TRI

Sotiria Triantari

{"title":"Stoicism and Byzantine philosophy: Proairesis in Epictetus and Nicephorus Blemmydes","authors":"Sotiria Triantari","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.17.04TRI","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.17.04TRI","url":null,"abstract":"Was the Byzantine thinker Nicephorus Blemmydes (1197–1272) directly influenced in his views about human “proairesis” by the Stoic Epictetus (50–138 AD) or did he take over his views from the Neoplatonic Simplicius?\u0000After exploring Blemmydes’ reception of Epictetus, one can say that Blemmydes drew elements in a brief treatise under the title “De virtute et ascesi” from the mainly Neoplatonic Simplicius, who commented on the handbook by the \u0000Stoic Epictetus (50–138 AD). Blemmydes, following Simplicius identifies “ἐφ’ ἡμῖν” with “aftexousion” and he designates “proairesis” as an activity, which emanates from “aftexousion”. Blemmydes shows the moral power of “proairesis” as a transforming factor of human existence and the mediatory factor to the dialectical relation between man and God.\u0000For the completion of the study, the following sources have been used: \u0000Blemmydes’ De virtute et ascesi, Epictetus’ Handbook, and Neoplatonic Simplicius’ commentaries on the Handbook. I specifically focus on the views of Aristotle, Epictetus, and Neoplatonic Simplicius about “proairesis” and compare the views of Blemmydes to Simplicius’ ideas. I conclude that Blemmydes drew ideas from Simplicius, with regard to human “proairesis” and in the context of the practising and cultivating virtues in everyday life.","PeriodicalId":148050,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122195619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

A Companion to Meister Eckhart 埃克哈特先生的同伴

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/bpjam.19.11jun

C. Jung

引用次数: 0

The moral intellectualism of Plato’s Socrates: The case of the Hippias Minor 柏拉图笔下苏格拉底的道德智识主义:以小希比阿为例

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.13.01BAL

O. Balaban

引用次数: 2

Das Prinzip der Rationalität. Grundzüge cusanischen Denkens als Parameter für Toleranz und interreligiösen Diskurs 理性的原则美式思维的根源，认为这是包容和宗教间对话的参数

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.19.13WIN

N. Winkler

引用次数: 1

HUBERT SCHRÖCKER: Das Verhältnis der Allmacht Gottes zum Kontradiktionsprinzip nach Wilhelm von Ockham 施罗德:在奥克兰(德国奥克兰)看来，上帝全能与对立原则的关系

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.9.19LEN

M. Lenz

引用次数: 0

The Ontological Relation "One-Many" according to the Neoplatonist Damascius 新柏拉图主义者大马士革认为的“一-多”的本体论关系

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.1.02TER

C. Terezis

{"title":"The Ontological Relation \"One-Many\" according to the Neoplatonist Damascius","authors":"C. Terezis","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.1.02TER","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.1.02TER","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn his commentary on the Platonic dialogue Philebus, the Neoplatonic philosopher Damascius investigates the ontological question of the relation between the One as the highest principle and the many sensible beings produced through it. Three points are emphasized: 1. Damascius attempts to situate movement in the metaphysical realm and avoid a static metaphysical model by propounding a connection between sensible beings and their productive archetype through what he conceives as metaphysical amplification. 2. His explication of the relation between the physical and the metaphysical indicates that he is not concerned with just a general description, but instead intends to specify the forms of their mutual communication. To a certain degree, physical beings are presented as developments of metaphysical states in terms of the relation of \"appearance\" to \"being,\" in the sense that the appearance teleologically portrays that which is ontologically complete. 3. Because Damascius sets logic in analytic relation to ontology and defines the conditions of this coordination, it gains no independent status, even as its propriety becomes explicit, for he shows its principal determination by ontology. Hence, Damascius remains within the framework of a consistent ontological realism.","PeriodicalId":148050,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127901233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Henologie bei Platon und Plotin 我是柏拉图和Plotin

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.8.03HAL

J. Halfwassen

引用次数: 0

Nicholas of Amsterdam’s Conceptualism in his Commentary on the Logica vetus 阿姆斯特丹尼古拉斯的观念主义论《矛盾论》

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.14.09BOS

E. Bos

引用次数: 0

PLATON: Gorgias (Platon, Werke VI 3)

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.10.23CUR

Dirk Cürsgen

引用次数: 0

Nicholas of Amsterdam on Infinity 阿姆斯特丹的尼古拉斯

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.15.07DEW

Thomas Dewender

引用次数: 0