Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter最新文献_第10页

Aristotle on Practical Truth: Coherence vs. Correspondence? 亚里士多德论实践真理:连贯与对应?

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.9.11GRA

A. Graeser

引用次数: 0

Zur Einheit der modalen Syllogistik des Aristoteles 加入亚里士多德泽潟联队

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.13.04SCH

K. Schmidt

{"title":"Zur Einheit der modalen Syllogistik des Aristoteles","authors":"K. Schmidt","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.13.04SCH","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.13.04SCH","url":null,"abstract":"On the unity of modal syllogistics in Aristotle. The goal of this paper is an interpretation of Aristotle’s modal syllogistics closely oriented on the text using the resources of modern modal predicate logic. Modern predicate logic was successfully able to interpret Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistics uniformly, that is, with one formula for universal premises. A corresponding uniform interpretation of modal syllogistics by means of modal predicate logic is not possible. This thesis does not imply that a uniform view is abandoned. However, it replaces the simple unity of the assertoric by the complex unity of the modal. The complexity results from the fact that though one formula for universal premises is used as the basis, it must be moderated if the text requires.Aristotle introduces his modal syllogistics by expanding his assertoric syllogistics with an axiom that links two apodictic premises to yield a single apodictic sentence. He thus defines a regular modern modal logic. By means of the regular modal logic that is thus defined, he is able to reduce the purely apodictic syllogistics to assertoric syllogistics. However, he goes beyond this simple structure when he looks at complicated inferences.In order to be able to link not only premises of the same modality, but also premises with different modalities, he introduces a second axiom, the T-axiom, which infers from necessity to reality or – equivalently – from reality to possibility. Together, the two axioms, the axiom of regularity and the T-axiom, define a regular T-logic. It plays an important role in modern logic. In order to be able to account for modal syllogistics adequately as a whole, another modern axiom is also required, the so-called B-axiom. It is very difficult to decide whether Aristotle had the B-axiom. Each of the two last named axioms is sufficient to achieve the required contextual moderation of the basic formula for universal propositions.","PeriodicalId":148050,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121629878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Lawrence of Lindores on Immortality. An Edition with Analysis of Four of his Quaestiones in Aristotelis libros De anima 林多雷斯的劳伦斯论不朽。亚里士多德《动物论》中的四个问题分析

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.2.11DEW

Thomas Dewender, O. Pluta

引用次数: 1

Peri Idheoon / Über Ideen – Beweise der Akademiker

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.3.10ARI

Aristoteles

引用次数: 0

Der Alexandrismus an den Universitäten im späten Mittelalter 中世纪后期大学里的亚历山大主义

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.1.05PLU

Olaf Pluta

{"title":"Der Alexandrismus an den Universitäten im späten Mittelalter","authors":"Olaf Pluta","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.1.05PLU","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.1.05PLU","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis essay outlines the history of Alexandrism in the Middle Ages, focusing on the reception of Alexander of Aphrodisias in the late-medieval universities. Alexander of Aphrodisias met with severe criticism in the 13th century from William of Auvergne, Albert the Great and Thomas of Aquinas among others, but in the 14th century this attitude changed completely with John Buridan, giving way to a positive and productive adoption of his theories. The centerpiece of the controversy was Alexander's doctrine that the human soul is similar to the animal soul and hence mortal \"like the soul of a dog or a donkey.\" Previously condemned as the absurd thesis of an outsider - wrongly so, because Alexander was perfectly in line with a long peripatetic tradition beginning with Dikaiarch of Messene and Straton of Lampsakos -, this doctrine was now considered philosophically superior to and sounder than the competing theories of Averroes and the Roman Catholic faith. In connection with this doctrine, Buridan stated that some higher species of animals have the ability to think like a man or an ape (sicut homo vel simia) and that an ape can even be said to have some reason. Buridan's interpretation of Alexander was disseminated at the universities of the 14th and 15th centuries by his many followers, including Lawrence of Lindores, Marsilius of Inghen (who defended Alexander against Albert the Great), Nicholas of Amsterdam, Biagio Pelacani of Parma and Benedikt Hesse of Krakow.","PeriodicalId":148050,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123863780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Platon und das Sokratische Pragma 柏拉图和苏格拉底讲学

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.9.01MEY

Martin F. Meyer

引用次数: 0

Nicholas of Cusa, Selected Spiritual Writings 库萨的尼古拉斯，《精神著作选集》

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.2.25FUH

M. Führer

引用次数: 23

Y. Nakayama, Kommentierte japanische Ausgabe der lateinischen Werke Meister Eckharts, Bd. V / U. Kern, Der Gang der Vernunft bei Meister Eckhart 叶尔加，中山记载了《愿主拉克哈特的拉丁语作品》的日本版

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/bpjam.16.11moj

B. Mojsisch

引用次数: 0

Die Pluralität der Intellekte und die Einheit der Erkenntnis: Kritiken und Rezeptionen des Monopsychismus des Averroes in der sog. Scholastik 大量智慧和统一的知识:批评和独揽avery精神Scholastik

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.12.05LEE

Sang-Sup Lee

引用次数: 0

Misticus interpres poetarum. Coluccio Salutatis De laboribus Herculis (1405) in moderner Erstübersetzung

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.2.18STO

E. Stoeckel

引用次数: 0