{"title":"Girl with Maquette: A Memoir of Prefigurative Imaginaries at Work","authors":"Jilly Traganou","doi":"10.55588/ajar.332","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55588/ajar.332","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":147974,"journal":{"name":"ARENA Journal of Architectural Research","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124620695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Political Dimensions of Research by Design","authors":"Johan Liekens, Fredrik Nilsson, Nel Janssens","doi":"10.55588/ajar.334","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55588/ajar.334","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":147974,"journal":{"name":"ARENA Journal of Architectural Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134183889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Overwriting the Memory of a Modern Ruin in Chile: From UNCTAD III to GAM","authors":"Ken Qiu Sun","doi":"10.5334/ajar.305","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ajar.305","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":147974,"journal":{"name":"ARENA Journal of Architectural Research","volume":"141 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123178529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction: Dissecting the Archipelago: PhD by Design Concepts in the Fields of Architecture and Urban Design","authors":"Hanne Van Reusel, C. Michels, Yves Schoonjans","doi":"10.5334/ajar.326","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ajar.326","url":null,"abstract":"This article details a correction to: Van Reusel, H., Michels, C and Schoonjans, Y., Dissecting the Archipelago: PhD by Design Concepts in the Fields of Architecture and Urban Design. ARENA Journal of Architectural Research. 2021; 6(1): p.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ajar.255 .","PeriodicalId":147974,"journal":{"name":"ARENA Journal of Architectural Research","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124662094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Dissecting the Archipelago: PhD by Design Concepts in the Fields of Architecture and Urban Design","authors":"Hanne Van Reusel, C. Michels, Yves Schoonjans","doi":"10.5334/ajar.255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ajar.255","url":null,"abstract":"PhD programmes within the disciplines of architecture and urban design have in the last decades presented various designerly approaches. In this paper, we suggest viewing the numerous conceptual contributions as an ‘emerging archipelago’ of different attitudes and positions which PhD candidates, as much as PhD programmes, need to navigate, find their standing point within, and contribute to. By presenting five cross-sections of this archipelago, our aim is to offer perspectives to dissect, cut through and explore the nature of the complex conceptual landscape of PhD by Design (PbD). These cross sections have been drawn up from literature reviews and discussions within the context of the Erasmus+ project ‘Mapping, Reflecting and Developing PhD-by-Design Programmes’. Each of the five sections presents one of the following topical debates: science/design, subjectivity, disciplinarity, literacies and practice/theory. In our analysis of Annelies De Smet’s doctoral thesis, ‘Architecting Bodies by Immersive Gestures’, we (graphically) sketch out how a research project can be positioned within the messy and continuously emerging PbD landscape. Introducing the metaphor of an emergent archipelago, the paper opts for an open attitude. By dissecting this archipelago, we aim (in an inevitable act of simplification) to unpack perspectives and raise questions regarding the various approaches that coexist, with overlaps, nuances and oppositions present in their own foundations. We encourage readers to explore in a non-dogmatic way – and to position themselves in – the ‘emerging archipelago’ of attitudes and positions and to thus contribute to its ongoing formation. Publisher’s Note: A correction article relating to this paper has been published and can be found at https://ajar.arena-architecture.eu/articles/10.5334/ajar.326/ .","PeriodicalId":147974,"journal":{"name":"ARENA Journal of Architectural Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124933168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"One-man-band: Clough Williams-Ellis’ Architectural Ensemble at Portmeirion","authors":"Maria Angelica Chacon Manosalva","doi":"10.5334/AJAR.268","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/AJAR.268","url":null,"abstract":"Portmeirion, a niche holiday resort in North Wales that was designed and built by Sir Clough Williams-Ellis from 1925 to 1976, is usually seen by architectural historians as an ‘idiosyncratic playground of little interest’. In contrast, the village regards itself as an architectural site that not only formed part of the massive expansion of seaside tourism in Britain from the early 1900s, but also responded to this trend by using a unique and sustainable approach characterised by Williams-Ellis as ‘light-opera’. Whilst the characteristic look of Portmeirion corresponds to aesthetic decisions made by Williams-Ellis, it also reflects his lifelong effort to introduce pleasurable and accessible forms of architecture to the British public. This essay, by including a narrative mode of creative writing that describes my own journey to Portmeirion, aims to challenge the common association of the village in fictional representations such as the 1960s TV series The Prisoner, as well as tackling its long disregard within British architectural history. Instead, the essay positions Portmeirion as an important exemplar of the reactions in early-to-mid twentieth century Britain against what were regarded as unsympathetic rural leisure developments.","PeriodicalId":147974,"journal":{"name":"ARENA Journal of Architectural Research","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124603276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Piercing the Screen of the Dispositif: Interrogating the Ideological Effects of the Perspectival Image","authors":"Sebastian Aedo Jury","doi":"10.5334/AJAR.292","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/AJAR.292","url":null,"abstract":"In the exhibition, ‘Piercing the Screen of the Dispositif’, held at the Tent Gallery at the Edinburgh College of Art in October 2017, images of the film House: After Five Years of Living – made by Charles and Ray Eames in 1955 – were extracted, dissected and spatialised. Using Jean Louis Baudry’s concept of the dispositif in film studies, and Jacques Lacan’s notion of the image/screen, this essay provides an analytical critique of the Eameses’ film and their representation of the domestic interior through the screen. The aim is to extrapolate and identify, through design-based research, some of the components in the configuration of Baudry’s dispositif. Through drawings and the construction of a physical structure, the exhibition proposed an alternative architectonic assemblage of such components, suggesting new subjective and material consequences in the process. In this sense, in this essay, the use of drawings and models acts as an analytical instrument in which the specificity of the studied medium (in this case, film) is suspended, unpacked, and deconstructed to re-construct an apparatus that proposes an alternative ‘disposition’ of its images. As an extension, it also proposes the representation of a domestic interior that is not simply constrained to a visual experience, but which expands as a visual landscape and a spatial performance within the gallery space.","PeriodicalId":147974,"journal":{"name":"ARENA Journal of Architectural Research","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127185305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Colston’s Travels, or Should We Talk About Statues?","authors":"E. Branscome","doi":"10.5334/AJAR.261","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/AJAR.261","url":null,"abstract":"The toppling of slave trader Edward Colston’s statue in Bristol on 7th June 2020, and its dispatch into the waters of the nearby harbour – a defiant act of protest by members of Britain’s ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement – helped to raise international awareness that far too many statues and other artefacts within the urban realm carry troubling histories, even if their contentious associations might have been forgotten. Acting as quasi-Trojan horses, they can appear benign enough within their cultural landscapes while yet silently continuing to reinforce socio-economic inequalities. This essay investigates the incident in Bristol to offer a wider reassessment of those cultural legacies now seen as ‘difficult heritage’, particularly those associated with slave trading in the former British Empire. It looks at how the cultural value of the Colston statue, when viewed over time in relation to material and ideological conditions in Bristol as a declining port city, creates a real tension in their meaning today given that they so obviously represent a highly selective construction of local history. The increasingly vociferous demand globally for the removal of such sculptures, especially by the ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement, exposes the ongoing evasiveness and indecisiveness of official bodies in dealing with such artefacts. While the final outcome of the toppling of the Colston statue remains in the balance in terms of its legal resolution, the role of urban art as part of activism and protest clearly demands more attention. This essay traces the emergence of debates about ‘difficult heritage’ as a combination of social performance and civil disobedience. As this kind of struggle continues, the urgent questions become who should be allowed to determine what is considered history and how should it be displayed in our urban public spaces?","PeriodicalId":147974,"journal":{"name":"ARENA Journal of Architectural Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126322839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Populism as Counter-Theory in Greek Architectural Discourse","authors":"Kostas Tsiambaos","doi":"10.5334/ajar.179","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ajar.179","url":null,"abstract":"While the established histories of architectural theory generally focus upon the discourse produced by eminent architects and/or famous scholars, there is another counter-discourse that has developed gradually in the background. This is a discourse against architectural theory, in an effort to undermine theory’s importance, even to eliminate its value, scope and use altogether. Yet this implicit anti-theory – which has slowly but steadily become embedded in the international architectural scene over the last decades – is usually ignored or underestimated by architectural historians. Drawing upon the recent literature on populism (e.g. Arditi, Moffitt, Taggart, Laclau), and also taking into consideration the few, but valuable, recent texts about populism within architecture (e.g. Fausch, Fowler, Shamiyeh, Lootsma), I will argue that a populist trend against theoretical inquiry is nowadays dispersed horizontally, thereby legitimizing particular, even if diverging, research methods and design practices. The fight against intellectualism and the elites, the promoting of a new sense of architectural ‘morality’, the use of simplistic procedures, forms and slogans, are among the many symptoms of a populist mentality that traverses ideological boundaries, social contexts and conflicting political identities, linking dreams of radical communal utopias to fantasies of limitless post-capitalist markets. This essay discusses in particular the ways in which such a counter-theoretical discourse has re-emerged in the last decades among architects in Greece. By examining the publications about twentieth-century Greek architects (notably Dimitris Pikionis and Aris Konstantinidis), as well as looking at the informal talks and interviews being spread today through the internet (such as greekarchitects.gr on the Vimeo channel), I will comment on how, in the case of Greece, a long established populist architectural rhetoric was, and still is, disguised behind various anti-theoretical facades.","PeriodicalId":147974,"journal":{"name":"ARENA Journal of Architectural Research","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126475882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Deciding on Bamboo or Steel as a Building Material in Rural China: The Area X Project","authors":"Daniel Stamatis, Tan Gangyi","doi":"10.5334/AJAR.121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/AJAR.121","url":null,"abstract":"The rapid process of quasi-urbanisation in rural China is promoting Western styles of architecture along with imported materials, making rural tourism less appealing. Despite the abundance of highly renewable bamboo, rural dwellers tend to overlook it for construction purposes. This essay therefore discusses the potential of bamboo architecture to help the regeneration of traditional Chinese villages. A participatory action approach was used to design and construct a touristic building called Area X in Zhengjia Shan village, Hubei province, completed in 2017. Initially we as the architects had wanted to use a bamboo structure for Area X but instead the villagers chose steel scaffolding. After explaining how the decision was made in favour of steel, the essay examines bamboo and steel in terms of their comparative environmental impacts: it shows that the steel scaffolding has a very negative impact in emitting 6,410.25 kg of CO2, regardless of its rapid assembly and reusability, whereas the bamboo version would have made a very positive impact by storing 14,384.13 kg of CO2 over the building’s lifetime. These findings suggest that the aspiration for modernity by the villagers in Zhengjia Shan took priority over environmental awareness. Hence the essay concludes by arguing that bamboo architecture should not be taken lightly, and indeed can be seen as essential given humankind’s need to adapt to climate change by only designing carbon-positive buildings from now on.","PeriodicalId":147974,"journal":{"name":"ARENA Journal of Architectural Research","volume":"207 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115914749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}