Deciding on Bamboo or Steel as a Building Material in Rural China: The Area X Project

Daniel Stamatis, Tan Gangyi
{"title":"Deciding on Bamboo or Steel as a Building Material in Rural China: The Area X Project","authors":"Daniel Stamatis, Tan Gangyi","doi":"10.5334/AJAR.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid process of quasi-urbanisation in rural China is promoting Western styles of architecture along with imported materials, making rural tourism less appealing. Despite the abundance of highly renewable bamboo, rural dwellers tend to overlook it for construction purposes. This essay therefore discusses the potential of bamboo architecture to help the regeneration of traditional Chinese villages. A participatory action approach was used to design and construct a touristic building called Area X in Zhengjia Shan village, Hubei province, completed in 2017. Initially we as the architects had wanted to use a bamboo structure for Area X but instead the villagers chose steel scaffolding. After explaining how the decision was made in favour of steel, the essay examines bamboo and steel in terms of their comparative environmental impacts: it shows that the steel scaffolding has a very negative impact in emitting 6,410.25 kg of CO2, regardless of its rapid assembly and reusability, whereas the bamboo version would have made a very positive impact by storing 14,384.13 kg of CO2 over the building’s lifetime. These findings suggest that the aspiration for modernity by the villagers in Zhengjia Shan took priority over environmental awareness. Hence the essay concludes by arguing that bamboo architecture should not be taken lightly, and indeed can be seen as essential given humankind’s need to adapt to climate change by only designing carbon-positive buildings from now on.","PeriodicalId":147974,"journal":{"name":"ARENA Journal of Architectural Research","volume":"207 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARENA Journal of Architectural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/AJAR.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The rapid process of quasi-urbanisation in rural China is promoting Western styles of architecture along with imported materials, making rural tourism less appealing. Despite the abundance of highly renewable bamboo, rural dwellers tend to overlook it for construction purposes. This essay therefore discusses the potential of bamboo architecture to help the regeneration of traditional Chinese villages. A participatory action approach was used to design and construct a touristic building called Area X in Zhengjia Shan village, Hubei province, completed in 2017. Initially we as the architects had wanted to use a bamboo structure for Area X but instead the villagers chose steel scaffolding. After explaining how the decision was made in favour of steel, the essay examines bamboo and steel in terms of their comparative environmental impacts: it shows that the steel scaffolding has a very negative impact in emitting 6,410.25 kg of CO2, regardless of its rapid assembly and reusability, whereas the bamboo version would have made a very positive impact by storing 14,384.13 kg of CO2 over the building’s lifetime. These findings suggest that the aspiration for modernity by the villagers in Zhengjia Shan took priority over environmental awareness. Hence the essay concludes by arguing that bamboo architecture should not be taken lightly, and indeed can be seen as essential given humankind’s need to adapt to climate change by only designing carbon-positive buildings from now on.
在中国农村选择竹还是钢作为建筑材料:X区项目
中国农村快速的准城市化进程正在推动西方风格的建筑和进口材料,使乡村旅游的吸引力下降。尽管有丰富的高度可再生的竹子,农村居民往往忽视它的建设目的。因此,本文讨论了竹建筑在帮助中国传统村庄再生方面的潜力。采用参与式行动的方法设计和建造了位于湖北省郑家山村的旅游建筑X区,该建筑于2017年完工。最初,作为建筑师,我们想在X区使用竹制结构,但村民们选择了钢脚手架。在解释了如何做出有利于钢铁的决定后,本文在比较环境影响方面考察了竹子和钢铁:它表明,钢脚手架在排放6,410.25千克二氧化碳方面具有非常负面的影响,无论其快速组装和可重复使用,而竹子版本将通过在建筑物的使用寿命中存储14,384.13千克二氧化碳而产生非常积极的影响。这些发现表明,正家山村民对现代化的渴望优先于环境意识。因此,这篇文章的结论是,竹制建筑不应该被轻视,事实上,从现在开始,人类需要通过设计碳正建筑来适应气候变化,竹制建筑可以被视为必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信