AIS Trans. Replication Res.最新文献

筛选

英文中文

On the Merits and Limits of Replication and Negation for IS Research 论IS研究中复制与否定的优点与局限性

AIS Trans. Replication Res. Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.17705/1ATRR.00016

S. Olbrich, U. Frank, S. Gregor, F. Niederman, F. Rowe

{"title":"On the Merits and Limits of Replication and Negation for IS Research","authors":"S. Olbrich, U. Frank, S. Gregor, F. Niederman, F. Rowe","doi":"10.17705/1ATRR.00016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17705/1ATRR.00016","url":null,"abstract":"A simple idea underpins the scientific process: All results should be subject to continued testing and questioning. Given the particularities of our international IS discipline, different viewpoints seem to be required to develop a picture of the merits and limits of testing and replication. Hence, the authors of this paper approach the topic from different perspectives. Following the ongoing discourse in neighbouring disciplines, we start by highlighting the significance of testing, replication and negation for scientific discourse as well as for the sponsors of research initiatives. Next, we discuss types of replication research and the challenges associated with each. In the third section, challenging questions are raised in the light of the ability of IS research for self-correction. Then, we address publication issues related to types of replications that require shifting editorial behaviors. The fifth section reflects on the possible use and interpretation of replication results in the light of contingency. As a key takeaway, the paper suggests ways to identify studies worth replicating in our field and reflects on possible roles of replication and testing for future IS research.","PeriodicalId":146711,"journal":{"name":"AIS Trans. Replication Res.","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133923306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 19

How Does Guanxi Affect Intention to Share Knowledge in the US? A Replication Study 在美国，关系如何影响知识分享意愿?一项重复性研究

AIS Trans. Replication Res. Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.17705/1ATRR.00018

Jordana J. George, Jie Yan

{"title":"How Does Guanxi Affect Intention to Share Knowledge in the US? A Replication Study","authors":"Jordana J. George, Jie Yan","doi":"10.17705/1ATRR.00018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17705/1ATRR.00018","url":null,"abstract":"We undertake a replication of research conducted in China, The Impact of Trust, Guanxi Orientation and Face on the Intention of Chinese Employees and Managers to Engage in Peer-To-Peer Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Sharing, originally published in Information Systems Journal. The study explores how aspects of Guanxi affect the intention to share knowledge. Guanxi is the Chinese phenomenon of a tight network or relationship, and the original research found that it influences the intention to share both tacit and explicit knowledge. The original study explored Cognitive, Affect, Face-Saving, and Face-Gaining constructs in explaining the influences on the intention to share knowledge. We look at how this study translates to a US business school to find out if any of the original constructs apply outside of Chinese culture in regards to sharing knowledge. Our study did not demonstrate any relationship with the FaceSaving or Face-Gaining aspects of Guanxi on the intention to share knowledge. On the other hand, we did find that the Cognitive construct (skills) had a positive relationship with knowledge sharing, unlike the original. Last, both studies demonstrate a relationship between Affect and knowledge sharing, as well as Guanxi (or relationship) and knowledge sharing, indicating that people who get along well and like each other are more likely to share knowledge, regardless of Chinese or US cultural background.","PeriodicalId":146711,"journal":{"name":"AIS Trans. Replication Res.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128547773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

首页上一页