Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie最新文献_第2页

Justice as Luck Egalitarian Fairness? 正义作为运气平等主义的公平?

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0012217319000052

Louis-Philippe Hodgson

{"title":"Justice as Luck Egalitarian Fairness?","authors":"Louis-Philippe Hodgson","doi":"10.1017/S0012217319000052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217319000052","url":null,"abstract":"In A Conceptual Investigation of Justice, Kyle Johannsen maintains that the strongest version of John Rawls’s theory of justice is one that incorporates the luck egalitarian conception of fairness developed by G.A. Cohen. He also contends that, once the theory is modified in this way, it becomes clear that the original position doesn’t yield principles of justice but rather what Cohen calls ‘rules of regulation.’ I argue that the minimal conception of fairness that Rawls favours is the right one for his purposes, and that bringing in luck egalitarian fairness would render the outcome of the original position indeterminate. Kyle Johannsen soutient que, pour être pleinement convaincante, la théorie de la justice de John Rawls doit incorporer la conception de l’équité associée avec l’égalitarisme des chances de G.A. Cohen. Il maintient également que, lorsqu’on modifie ainsi la théorie de Rawls, on voit que les principes choisis dans la position originelle doivent être ce que Cohen appelle des «règles de régulation». Je rétorque que la conception de l’équité qu’adopte Rawls est idéalement adaptée aux besoins de sa théorie, et que l’incorporation de la conception de l’équité que défend Cohen rendrait indéterminé le résultat de la position originelle.","PeriodicalId":145102,"journal":{"name":"Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128095099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Values for Foxes? A Comment on Kyle Johannsen’s A Conceptual Investigation of Justice 狐狸的价值?凯尔·约翰森《正义的概念考察》评析

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0012217319000088

Colin M. Macleod

引用次数: 0

Le monisme matériel de Franz Brentano 弗朗茨·布伦塔诺的物质一元论

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0012217319000416

G. Bucchioni, L. Iglesias

引用次数: 1

The Conceptual Foundations of Transitional Justice COLLEEN MUPRHY Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017; 221 pp.; $114.95 (hardback) 《过渡时期司法的概念基础》科琳·穆菲剑桥:剑桥大学出版社，2017;221页;114.95美元(精装)

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie Pub Date : 2018-12-27 DOI: 10.1017/S0012217318000690

S. Hawkins

引用次数: 0

Does God Know the Occurrence of a Change Among Particulars? Avicenna and the Problem of God’s Knowledge of Change 上帝知道细节变化的发生吗?阿维森纳和上帝对变化的知识问题

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1017/S0012217318000550

Amirhossein Zadyousefi

{"title":"Does God Know the Occurrence of a Change Among Particulars? Avicenna and the Problem of God’s Knowledge of Change","authors":"Amirhossein Zadyousefi","doi":"10.1017/S0012217318000550","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217318000550","url":null,"abstract":"(i) God is omniscient; therefore, for any change, C, among particulars, God knows the occurrence of C. (ii) If God knows the occurrence of C, then X. (iii) not-X. It is clear that the set of propositions (i)—(iii) is inconsistent. This is the general form of two problems—which I call the ‘problem of change in knowledge’ (PCK) and the ‘problem of change in essence’ (PCE)—for Avicenna concerning God’s knowledge of particulars. No work in the secondary literature has discussed exactly what PCK and PCE are. In this paper, I will clarify exactly what they are. (i) Dieu est omniscient. Donc, pour tout changement C parmi les particuliers, Dieu connaît la survenance de C. (ii) Si Dieu connaît la survenance de C, alors X. (iii) Non-X. Or la série de propositions (i) – (iii) est clairement incohérente. Ceci est la forme générale de deux problèmes relevés par Avicenne concernant la connaissance par Dieu des particuliers, que j’appelle «le problème du changement dans la connaissance» (PCC) et «le problème du changement dans l’essence» (PCE). Aucune œuvre dans la littérature secondaire ne discute de la nature des PCC et PCE. Je la clarifierai dans cette étude.","PeriodicalId":145102,"journal":{"name":"Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129213700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

On How (Not) to Argue for Preferring God’s Non-Existence 论如何(不)为宁愿上帝不存在而争论

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie Pub Date : 2018-10-29 DOI: 10.1017/S0012217318000574

Kirk Lougheed

引用次数: 1

The Bloomsbury Anthology of Transcendental Thought: From Antiquity to the Anthropocene DAVID LAROCCA (Ed.) New York: Bloomsbury Publishing Inc., 2017; 848 pp., $44.95 (paper) 《布卢姆斯伯里超验思想选集:从古代到人类世》大卫·拉罗卡(主编)纽约:布卢姆斯伯里出版公司，2017;848页，44.95美元(纸质版)

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie Pub Date : 2018-09-17 DOI: 10.1017/S0012217318000537

J. Rome

引用次数: 3